[PAX] The Impeachment of Donald J. Trump

FuycdYA.png
 
People in the federal government are staying quiet like when a big company is going through a reduction in force (RIF). It seems like applause would draw attention to oneself and nobody wants that during a RIF.

It’s a shame that the government couldn’t get that budget approved.

Pelosi said AOC isn’t in charge because it’s Hakeem Jefferies. Word has it that AOC was going to primary Schumer. I think Pelosi was attempting to protect Schumer by offloading the shutdown blame. Poor Hakeem got thrown under the bus - at least that is the perception.

The rumor mill is in full swing and I think that’s the point. When nobody knows what’s about to happen then the distraction makes it easy to do whatever “they” want.

All of them are a bunch of Machiavellian’s.
 
So the Gov shut down is because of AOC, this is a brilliant political move as making a Brown skinned woman the cause of the shut down hits so many of the maga strong points.
I think someone should start a thread called "The Impeachment of President Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez"
 
this is a brilliant political move as making a Brown skinned woman the cause of the shut down hits so many of the maga strong points.
When race or skin color becomes the foundation in discourse, the person who introduces it loses all credibility.

Nobody thought AOC was in charge - from either party. That much is clear. Check your inbox.
 
When race or skin color becomes the foundation in discourse, the person who introduces it loses all credibility.
So that would be the Republican party in about 1970?

Cheers,
Ian
 
in this context, SUT about 45 mins ago and now you for attempting to perpetuate it.
@TomasM

You’ve done it before, and you are doing it again. Please stop. If you do not know a prrson’s reasoning, simply ask. Do not project and assign.

Cheers,
Ian
 
I call it as I see it.

I’ve asked that these type of discussion stop entirely. The site knows it’s happening but is complicit.

I don’t care about politicians or parties. I do care about INFJ’s and anytime that hate and chaos is getting spewed about then it is bad for the site and the people who like to engage with people of a similar temperament.

This is not the first time race was used with aggression and purpose in this thread. It’s also not the first time PAX had to be mentioned.

This thread has nothing to do with impeachment and everything to do with people who engage as a means to create chaos - some of which are incentivized to do it.

So, continue as you like and I will call it out as I see it.
 
I call it as I see it.
Yes, and I am letting you know you seem blind.

Your point is well taken. Know that I initially replied to you straightforwardly, without irony or snark.

What I take issue with is you claiming to see what cannot be seen. In doing so, you are disrespecting boundary, and I am asking you to knock it off.

Let the topic be the topic, and discuss it on the merits thereof. Do not engage in ad hominem.

Notice, I am questioning your words, not your intent, as I cannot know that, aside from asking you and trusting your answer. I would appreciate being offered the same in return.

Cheers,
Ian
 
As it regards impeachment, that world is dead and gone. There will be no impeachment.

Cheers,
Ian
 
By all means @aeon.

Tell us all how the Republicans in the 1970’s in the context of race has anything to do with the Impeachment of Donald Trump.

Tell me how bringing up AOC in the context of race had anything to do with what I said.

This thread has nothing to do with impeachment and everything to do with spreading hate and division. It might have had value when it was created but most of the people engaged back then have left.
 
You sit on a throne of lies
It’s your website. You know what is happening and have openly acknowledged it. You do nothing to alter or change the problem and you want to blame other people for calling it out.

You are literally sitting on the throne and your actions (or lack thereof) result in the outcome of this site.

Own you behavior @Wyote and stop blaming others for the problems you have the ability to fix. But perhaps you’re intent is division - you seem to like it. Why else would any employee attack his own patrons over the conditions of his establishment?
 
Last edited:
Tell us all how the Republicans in the 1970’s in the context of race has anything to do with the Impeachment of Donald Trump.
The primary connection between President Richard Nixon's actions against the Black Panther Party and the potential impeachment of President Donald Trump lies in the central constitutional principle of abuse of power and the alleged misuse of the authority of the Presidency and federal agencies for improper political purposes.

Nixon and the FBI/COINTELPRO: Nixon's administration, along with the FBI under J. Edgar Hoover, used the COINTELPRO (Counterintelligence Program) to “expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, or otherwise neutralize” domestic political groups, including the Black Panther Party, on the basis of both political position and race.

This involved a systematic campaign of misusing a federal law enforcement agency (the FBI) for political ends, employing tactics like infiltration, psychological warfare (planting false stories, forging letters), harassment, and even contributing to violence and assassinations. The goal was to dismantle a domestic political opposition movement and disrupt race-based coalitions.

In the impeachment proceedings against Nixon related to the broader Watergate scandal, one of the proposed articles of impeachment was for Abuse of Power, specifically for using federal agencies (including the FBI and IRS) to harass his political enemies and authorize burglaries.

Both of President Trump's impeachments involved articles charging him with Abuse of Power.

The first impeachment charged him with abusing the powers of his office by allegedly soliciting foreign interference (Ukraine) to benefit his personal political campaign, and conditioning official acts (military aid and a White House visit) on the foreign government agreeing to announce investigations into his political rival.

The second impeachment charged him with Incitement of Insurrection, which is viewed as an abuse of the office by failing to faithfully execute the laws and inciting violence against the government.

The underlying principle connecting these two distinct historical events is the accusation that a President misused the immense power and resources of the Executive Branch and federal agencies to target domestic political opponents and specific races to gain a personal political advantage.

Nixon wrote the book, Trump is following the script, and has released the sequel. If you want additional information about race-based abuses of power, consult Project 2025 and the actions of ICE against American citizens based on race discrimination.

In both cases, it is the abuse of power, predicated on racial disruption in the first case, and being a modus operandi of the second.

Cheers,
Ian
 
It’s your website. You know what is happening and have openly acknowledged it. You do nothing to alter or change the problem and you want to blame other people for calling it out.

You are literally sitting on the throne and your actions (or lack thereof) result in the outcome of this site.

Own you behavior @Wyote and stop blaming others for the problems you have the ability to fix. But perhaps you’re intent is division - you seem to like it. Why else would any employee attack his own patrons over the conditions of his establishment?

Correction: You sit on a reflection of lies rofl
 
As it regards impeachment, that world is dead and gone. There will be no impeachment.

Cheers,
Ian
I misspoke. Trump has been impeached, twice. Nothing was, or shall be, done about it.

High crimes and misdemeanors are of no consequence. That is not to say meaningless. Authoritarians around the world know there is no consequence, so they will do what they will.

Cheers,
Ian
 
I misspoke. Trump has been impeached, twice. Nothing was, or shall be, done about it.

High crimes and misdemeanors are of no consequence. That is not to say meaningless. Authoritarians around the world know there is no consequence, so they will do what they will.

Cheers,
Ian

Luckily the khaki klan regime is entirely incompetent
 
Back
Top