Detective Conan
Doesn't Cast Shadows
- MBTI
- INFJ
- Enneagram
- 2w1
Sorry if this is in the wrong thread, but I feel there's enough psychology underlying the topic to justify it going into the psych parent forum. Mods may move if they disagree.
I sort of started thinking about this topic from the Firefox 4 discussion, but it's also been a topic that pops up frequently. Often when a new product (specifically an electronic) is released, people become gravitated to one product or another. This really doesn't confuse me, as I empathize with that gravitation, which usually results from positive experiences with other products made by the same manufacturer. What really confuses me is why people sometimes dislike others that like another competing product (PS3 v. 360, PSP v. DS, iPhone v. Android v. W7P, Mac v. PC, Dub v. Sub, et cetera). Why do fanboys/girls feel a need to confirm their own choice by proving any other choice is inferior? If you were to visit other forums that revolve around discussions of phones, games, or even television/movies/books, I'd bet you'd occasionally find a thread that compares two products that are somewhat similar and tries to prove one's better than the other. I honestly don't find anything wrong with this initial, but, again, I'm confounded by the flamewar that quickly ensues from such attempts (which are more or less considered "trolling" these days).
This topic isn't really inquiring about the reason for fanisms to exist, but rather why people see a need to allow conflicting fanisms to occupy their mind to such a degree as they sometimes do.
So, forum, what's your personal opinion on the topic?
I sort of started thinking about this topic from the Firefox 4 discussion, but it's also been a topic that pops up frequently. Often when a new product (specifically an electronic) is released, people become gravitated to one product or another. This really doesn't confuse me, as I empathize with that gravitation, which usually results from positive experiences with other products made by the same manufacturer. What really confuses me is why people sometimes dislike others that like another competing product (PS3 v. 360, PSP v. DS, iPhone v. Android v. W7P, Mac v. PC, Dub v. Sub, et cetera). Why do fanboys/girls feel a need to confirm their own choice by proving any other choice is inferior? If you were to visit other forums that revolve around discussions of phones, games, or even television/movies/books, I'd bet you'd occasionally find a thread that compares two products that are somewhat similar and tries to prove one's better than the other. I honestly don't find anything wrong with this initial, but, again, I'm confounded by the flamewar that quickly ensues from such attempts (which are more or less considered "trolling" these days).
This topic isn't really inquiring about the reason for fanisms to exist, but rather why people see a need to allow conflicting fanisms to occupy their mind to such a degree as they sometimes do.
So, forum, what's your personal opinion on the topic?