INFJ = ENFP

[VH]

According to neuroscience. I can't make this up.

Okay, they're not equivalent, but they're profoundly similar. In fact, INFJ appears to statistically have more in common with ENFP than any other type (with respect to which cerebral cortex regions are most commonly used, which regions work in cohesion, and how the regions interact with each other). INFJ also has more common with INTJ and ENTP than ENFJ or INFP. In other words, N doms have more in common than their respective temperaments.

The F doms (INFP, ISFP, ENFJ, and ESFJ) and T doms (INTP, ISTP, ENTJ, and ESTJ) also appear to have more in common with each other than their respective temperaments. However, this isn't true of S doms. Se and Si doms appear to have a very clear distinction.

Mid blowing. Thought I'd share.

 

[the]

Please elaborate on the s dom findings.

 

[Bikerdelic]

I find all the detail baffling to say the truth, all the S doms. Se and Si doms types, not knocking it, but as a INFJ type I get lost in the details (the devils in the details, whilst the divine is the bigger picture) as I prefer to stand back and take in the bigger picture of life. I worry that there is a danger of over labelling oneself and others, but if it for the means of greater understanding of ourselves and of other people then I can see it's usefulness. Just a thought, its certainly not meant as any form of criticism of your post.

 

[barbad0s]

If MBTI is pseudoscience, then wouldn't this be a pseudoneuroscience?

 

[Shaqie]

If MBTI is pseudoscience, then wouldn't this be a pseudoneuroscience?

Powerlogic is powerlogic!
Continue on topic please.