Oh no, INTJ on the scene! Cast aside compassion and brotherly love.
When I see videos like this, it makes me feel like that is a great person and that they truly care... but what about down the line? What about when he runs out of money to buy food and keep supplying to the destitute? I've always had a lingering uneasiness about many of these type of efforts to help the underprivelaged.
From seeing people who go on unemployment without any aspirations of getting a job until the checks are about to run out. Friends who say they have no opportunity and complain that nobody will hire them when they sit around their house playing video games all day and only fill out applications online - never stepping foot in the stores themselves to talk to a manager and make an impression. From the stories post-Hurricane Katrina where the government handed out debit cards so that the people could buy food, shelter, and clothes, but the #1 purchased item was alcohol. From people who will at once talk about how the government is taking all of their money for government programs for people who don't deserve them, and in the next sentence angrily state that the government isn't taking care of their needs enough, unwilling (or unable?) to see things from both sides. People acting like victims so that others will give them what they want... until they're supposed to actually do something for themselves, and then reacting angrily because they're unwilling to do so.
Sometimes I think of what the appropriate response would be for someone who really wants to help, and make a viable, long-lasting difference that isn't reliant on a source of external revenue. Perhaps a sort of house or warehouse with two communal bedrooms (separated by gender), a communal kitchen, communal bathrooms, and a multi-purpose room. Like in the military, or in an orphanage. Communal conditions for low functioning cost. Some of the occupants would be assigned to cook, some to clean, others to go out and find sources of income (jobs and such). Perhaps a communal business - Shephard Alliance Lawn Care Services. Volunteers would be needed to teach the occupants how to clean, cook, etc, and several streams of income from the working ones would allow for enough money to maintain the functioning of the facility after startup (perhaps along with charitable contributions). The ones who continually didn't perform their duties wouldn't be allowed to stay - it would be their choice to go back to their previous life. Eventually, the ones who did stay would learn the range of necessary skills in order to maintain themselves, would go off on their own (or in a group to continue in a multi-bedroom apartment or something - but on their own), and would be replaced by others who sought to get off the streets.
Even that, though, gives me that uneasy feeling. I get the feeling that theft, violence, drug use, unwillingness to perform, and all manner of other things would occur by a vast majority of the inhabitants. After all - how did most of them end up on the street in the first place? That's not to say that it's bad, but that it's their way of live and they choose not to change because what they're doing has worked decently for them for quite a while - relying on the charity of others. Some may say that's extreme pessimism. I would imagine it as being realism. I could be wrong though, this is an imaginary playthrough.
So, is there an answer, or is there not one? I think, more and more, that people have to do these things for themselves. That is to say that nobody can do it for them. So I don't think that I can be involved in the answer, I can just try to help where I can, knowing that the conditions of most will not improve... and that a lot of them are fantastic at weaving stories.
Of course, I could be wrong about all of it. Who knows?