Lark
Rothchildian Agent
- MBTI
- ENTJ
- Enneagram
- 9
I've been thinking about this recently, with the revelations that child abuse, which was thought to be abherrent behaviour limited to small populations of pedophilies or situational pedophiles, has been much more widespread and even quasi-institutionalised (in recent UK history at least).
There were first the scandals eminating from the RCC which people attributed to a combination of clericalism/abuse of clerical power, both political/institutional and cultural/communitarian, and attempts to honour vows of sexual abstinence and celibacy. I personally think the former mattered more than the later, I know lots of people who live abstinent and virtually celibate lives without having taken formal vows about the matter and they dont suddenly develop proclivities for sex crimes. Still this was clearly identifiable as a minority within the larger population, I think there was a hell of a lot of secular and secularist self-flattery in the special sort of revulsion which was shown and stil is shown in relation to crimes perpetuated by the clergy of this kind.
Then there's be further revelations about celebrities exploiting their status in order to exploit and abuse children, patients, adults and children and now revelations about childrens homes being the site of abuse by staff, professionals and visiting diplomats, politicians, "dignitaries", establishment figures etc. in a systematic, organised and covered up fashion for years in childrens homes in Rochdale and northern ireland, in northern ireland there's been discussion of a cover up which involved the security services, intelligence community and organisations like the orange order and masonic lodges. Although that itself concerns me because the minute it can be theorised as all part of some crazy satanic/illuminati/dark forces conspiracy, instead of a human, all to human organised crime, it is and that serves to simultaneously sensationalise and rob of credibility.
My question is in light of revelations like this how endemic a problem does this seem? Is it something which is intractible, like some kinds of poverty, and attempts at creating structural responses or using bureaucracy (in the positive sense or even the realistic sense) will only chip away at the margins of it? What ways do news stories like this impress upon you? Do they make you more or less pessimistic about people, institutions etc.?
There were first the scandals eminating from the RCC which people attributed to a combination of clericalism/abuse of clerical power, both political/institutional and cultural/communitarian, and attempts to honour vows of sexual abstinence and celibacy. I personally think the former mattered more than the later, I know lots of people who live abstinent and virtually celibate lives without having taken formal vows about the matter and they dont suddenly develop proclivities for sex crimes. Still this was clearly identifiable as a minority within the larger population, I think there was a hell of a lot of secular and secularist self-flattery in the special sort of revulsion which was shown and stil is shown in relation to crimes perpetuated by the clergy of this kind.
Then there's be further revelations about celebrities exploiting their status in order to exploit and abuse children, patients, adults and children and now revelations about childrens homes being the site of abuse by staff, professionals and visiting diplomats, politicians, "dignitaries", establishment figures etc. in a systematic, organised and covered up fashion for years in childrens homes in Rochdale and northern ireland, in northern ireland there's been discussion of a cover up which involved the security services, intelligence community and organisations like the orange order and masonic lodges. Although that itself concerns me because the minute it can be theorised as all part of some crazy satanic/illuminati/dark forces conspiracy, instead of a human, all to human organised crime, it is and that serves to simultaneously sensationalise and rob of credibility.
My question is in light of revelations like this how endemic a problem does this seem? Is it something which is intractible, like some kinds of poverty, and attempts at creating structural responses or using bureaucracy (in the positive sense or even the realistic sense) will only chip away at the margins of it? What ways do news stories like this impress upon you? Do they make you more or less pessimistic about people, institutions etc.?