- MBTI
- INTJ - A
- Enneagram
- 10000
Mentalism or sanism is a form of discrimination and oppression because of a mental trait or condition a person has, or is judged to have. This may or may not be described in terms of mental disorder or disability. The discrimination is based on numerous factors such as: stereotypes about neurodivergence (e.g. autism, ADHD, bipolar, schizophrenia, personality disorder diagnoses), specific behavioral phenomena (e.g. stuttering, tics), or supposed intelligence.
Wikipedia
Where do you draw the line between adapting to/making accommodations for people's varying 'flavours' of mental health, and entering the area of discrimination, or patronisation?
When I go to my corner store there are a couple of people with 'issues', who regularly hang around the store entrance. I would not normally tolerate intrusive questions from anyone, but I tolerate them from one of these men, because he 'isn't playing with a full deck' (excuse the colloquialism, but that's how the store owner describes it). I often wonder, if I should tell the guy to fuck off, like I would to anyone else, but it neither seems fair to him, nor is it likely to precipitate a desirable outcome. Some people have argued to me that by not telling him to fuck off, I am ignoring/isolating/indirectly ostracising/excluding him, which is a passive type of oppression. Anyhow, in principle I would like to treat everyone the same, but I also don't want to. I hate the impasse.
Other situations might be clearer, but the question I have in mind comes from a regular interaction/non-interaction I have.
Last edited: