Are we as a society being kept from discussing the big issues?

[muir]

http://www.wakingtimes.com/2014/07/01/brain-exploring-nature-mind-holographic-brain/

You Are Not Your Brain — Exploring the Nature of Mind and our Holographic Brain


What is the true nature of mind, and what is the real function of our brains? The purpose of this article is to provide evidence that strongly indicates that you are not your brain, or your body for that matter, and that the nature of mind, of memory, and of our brains may actually be vastly different than we have been lead to believe.
Since time immemorial, man has been fascinated by the mind, leading great thinkers from Hippocrates to Descartes to ponder the nature of mind with wonder. Fast forward to modern times and observe how the mind is still revered and is dominating our culture. We have a lot of firm beliefs about the nature of mind, and I believe the ego - our limited perception of ourselves — and thus human ignorance, is intricately tied in with these beliefs.
But the truth of the matter is that we only understand a fraction of the minds potential, i.e. it’s capability of rote memorization and other analytically orientated functions, and we use even less.
We know hardly anything about the brain let alone the nature of mind. Is it possible that we are missing crucial aspects of its function and entire areas of development and potential that simply slide under the radar because they are not accepted by modern thought?
In this article we will explore the idea that the brain itself, with its tissue and neurons that we have until now deemed the source of our thoughts and identity, is actually just a tool, a receiver of human intelligence and consciousness, but not its source; and that the human mind is not sourced in the brain any more than the internet can be found in your laptop or your modem.

“My brain is only a receiver. In the Universe there is a core from which we obtain knowledge, strength and inspiration. I have not penetrated into the secrets of this core, but I know that it exists.” - Nikola Tesla
​

Projected Memory on the Screen of Consciousness

To begin I would like to delve into the work of a Canadian neurosurgeon named Wilder Penfield. Through his work with epileptic patients spanning from the 1930′s into the 1970′s he found that “stimulation of the human cerebral cortex with a gentle electrical current sometimes awakens specific memories, at other times dreams.” His work gave him insight into the function of the brain, memory, mind, and the interactions between them.
(This information on Wilder Penfield’s experiments is from his lectures The Mechanism of Memory, and Some Mechanisms of Consciousness Discovered During Electrical Stimulation of the Brain unless otherwise specified.)
During brain surgery once the brain was exposed, he found that by using an electrode that produced a “gentle” electrical current, he could stimulate areas of the brain and get specific, repeatable, intriguing and often times simply fascinating results. The patients were kept conscious throughout the procedure so that the doctors could carry out a conversation throughout the operation and receive immediate feedback on the nature of the experience these electrical currents would produce.
In one case an area he stimulated caused a man to not only hear a piano being played, but also to see the man sitting in front of him playing the piano. In another case a boy reported seeing men sitting on a chair and singing, and in yet another case the patient heard a complete orchestra. In each of these situations the individuals involved didn’t see fleeting shapes of people, or the wisp of a song, but they saw the image as vivid and clear as if they were actually there in the room.
One woman even heard a song, which turned out to not even have been one of her favorite songs, being played when an area of her brain was being stimulated. When stimulated at intervals without her knowledge (because the brain has no tactile sensation), the same song began playing again from the exact same spot.
The sound was so clear and flawless that she mistook a device in the operating room as a musical device that they were stopping and starting at intervals.
In all cases the patients recalled the events not like you would commonly recall a memory, which is usually as a fleeting mental image, but rather in such explicit detail that it was literally like they were reliving the event in question. Some patients literally saw people in front of them, and heard them just as clearly as if they were actually there.
As Dr. Penfield phrased it, it was like the mind was able to “project a memory or a dream upon the screen of consciousness.” Moreover he found that when he stimulated the brains of individuals and they remembered something, an image, or sound, or a feeling, those memories were always accompanied by the thought processes that accompanied them at the time. Therefore our brains record sensory data as a whole unit.

Holographic Memory and the Nature of Mind

In my article the unified field and the illusion of time, we explored some evidence supporting the understanding that all information is encoded directly into the field — the energy density of space/time — all around us (which unfortunately is beyond the scope of this article). But if we apply that understanding to the perception going on in this circumstance when Wilder Penfield stimulated the brains of his patients, what occurred was that his patients seemed to have perfect recall of past events and in visual cases, 3D or holographic memory.
This is not normal perception.
What if the stimulation of the brain itself caused his patients to project their memory onto the field? Or what if that information was already present in a holographic sense meaning that those images, and those songs and memories were encoded within the field, possibly recording directly into the field by the brain itself, and the stimulation by chance allowed them to perceive the memory directly in the field?
This not only suggests the possibility of holographic memory in human beings, but a very different understanding of memory itself (which we shall explore later).
The other thing that is interesting is that the events which were brought back were entirely mundane, meaning they were generally ordinary events of no significance. This suggests that our brains actually record every detail of our lives, even the mundane and ordinary, and that they are accessible to us if we could figure out how to access it, or in other words, how to tap into the full potential of our minds.
Wilder Penfield himself remarked that if the brain was indeed recording all of experience, then it is only natural that when dipping into this massive archive of information and memory that we happen upon ordinary events considering the vast quantity of information recorded in our lifetime (from How To Know God by Deepak Chopra).
In Deepak Chopra’s book How To Know God, he also cites how Wilder Penfield noted that the brain even retains memory while dormant, such as the fact that when patients are under deep anesthesia during surgery, about one percent of the population has a recollection of what the doctors were saying, and even some details of the procedure. It is interesting that…

“Under deep anesthesia, there are practically no higher brain waves at all, making it impossible for the cerebral cortex to accomplish anything so complex as remembering what a surgeon is saying.” (How to Know God, p. 217)
​

This is one of the reasons why Wilder Penfield concluded after nearly 40 years of research that the mind was an entity separate from the brain, and which did not rely on the brain to function.

Who Is The One Doing The Moving?

Deepak Chopra in his lecture series with Wayne Dyer entitled Living Beyond Miracles tells of another of Wilder Penfield’s experiments where he is stimulating the motor cortex of a patient’s brain which causes the patient to raise their arm in front of them. If we were to ask the man if it is him moving his are, he would reply that ‘No, I AM not.’
But when Penfield asked him to move his arm to the side the patient could move his arm, and he responded with something akin to ‘I AM moving my arm’, or ‘now I AM moving my arm’. Who is this I AM presence who is doing the moving? And why is it not activated when the body is moving on its own?
If our brain is the source of who we are, then any stimulation thereof which resulted in motion should give us the perception that it is us who is moving, but as Deepak Chopra states, because that is not the case this is indicative that our brain is not who we are, that the brain and body is only superficially related to who we are, and that the brain most certainly is not the source of who we are.
Brain Tissue Is Apparently Optional

Removing a hemisphere. Evidence for the holographic brain concept, and that our brain is only a recorder of experience and not the source of the mind can be found in a study done by Johns Hopkins University (J.H.U.) where they worked with brain-damaged children. They found that they could improve their level of intelligence and physical coordination by removing the damaged hemisphere of their brain. In essence, they literally cut out the damaged chunk of the children’s brain.
Within our current understanding of the brain this operation should significantly damage, if not irreparably hinder the child’s ability for memory and cognitive functions. From conventional understanding all of the functions which that hemisphere of the brain took care of would no longer be implemented leaving the child mentally deficient, or fragmented in some form.
If memories are stored in the brain, then after this operation those children should have lost those memories pertaining to the removed portion of their brain … if memories are stored in the brain. Yet the results were astonishing, and once again defied conventional thought.
Dr. Eileen P. G. Vining of J.H.U. studied 54 of the children who underwent the operation and she was simply astounded by the “retention of memory, and by the retention of the child’s personality and sense of humour.” A new version of the study was published in 2003 by John Hopkins University that dealt with 111 kids who had the operation between 1975 and 2003. Out of these 111 children 86% of them were seizure free or no longer needed medication (David Wilcock, The Source Field Investigations).
The mystery of hydrocephalus. For more evidence we move towards the work of Dr. John Lorber who is one of the world’s top experts on the condition known as hydrocephalus. Hydrocephalus is due to a problem with the flow cerebral spinal fluid which surrounds and cushions the brain, and when there is a blockage in this flow the pressure within the individual’s cranium is increased. Hydrocephalus means literally “water on the brain,” and brain swelling in this case leads to an oftentimes dramatic compression of brain tissue.
Dr. Lorber studied a total of 253 people with this condition. In the most severe cases, the pressure in the brain would increase to such a high level that the brain tissue would be compacted leaving the patient with only a fraction of their original amount of brain tissue. In Dr. Lorber’s study 9 people reached this severity with around only 5% of their total brain tissue left. That means only 5% of their neurons, brain cells, synapses, and so one were available in the patient’s brain.

Amazingly 4 out of 9 of those people with less than 5% of their brain tissue had an IQ over 100, and 2/9 had an IQ greater than 126. In other words 66.6% of them were fine. Given the drastic loss of brain tissue the obvious question is how is this possible? How can someone with almost literally no brain be intelligent at all, let alone above average?
Dr. Lorber was directed to a student at his university by his peers, literally based on the intriguingly large size of his head, they thought he may be of potential interest. This student had an IQ of 126 and had a “first-class honours degree in mathematics, and is socially completely normal.”
A brain scan was done on this individual with surprising results. It was found that out of the normal 4.5 cm of brain tissue, his condition had been compressed to only a few millimeters. In other words his head filled with cerebral spinal fluid, and only a few millimeters of brain tissue, yet he was still high functioning with above average intelligence (David Wilcock, The Source Field Investigations).
I have no technical understanding of how this is even possible except to simply suggest that possibly the conductivity and crystalline nature of water may be a contributing factor. Yet what this should clearly illustrate that we know very little of the true nature of mind, or the brain. Both of these once again demonstrate that the mind is independent of the brain.
The Nature of Mind-Brain Connection

This evidence raises some important questions:
What is the real function of our brains? Is it the brain tissue itself that creates our intelligence, or is it the electrical and conductive nature of the brain that allows us to connect to intelligence? More or less like a sophisticated antennae, just like Nikola Tesla observed of himself early in the 20th century.
All of this information so far creates a lot of friction with the current propagated understanding of the brain, if it doesn’t debunk it altogether. The information that Penfield discovered is suggesting that our brains are independent of our minds, and that all our memories are recorded in their entirety, and with the same detail that we experienced them. From where we do not yet know.
I also suggest that this is evidence that we have the potential for holographic memory. This hypothetically is a possible function of our minds where our memory is projected powerfully onto reality (onto the screen of the universal consciousness) so that we can experience and relive our memories in 3D. After all, this is what Wilder Penfield’s patients experienced.
As Johns Hopkins University, and John Lorber’s research found, it may not be that our brains are really that important. If children can have half their brains removed and retain their memories and personality, and if people can function with less than 5% of their brain tissue with above average intelligence, then what is the true purpose of the brain but as a vehicle for intelligence, not as the source of intelligence?
Like a highly sophisticated bio-technology that we use to experience this level of reality, create reality, and express ourselves. Like in the movie Avatar, maybe we are not actually our bodies but are just operating them.
Is our brain really where memories are stored? There is actually no evidence to support that even our memories are stored in the brain, and never has there been a memory discovered in the brain. This is because our brains are constantly changing and are not fixed structures.

The evidence is finally lining up with ancient spiritual truths from every culture which expressed explicitly that we are divine, and that our true nature is conscious awareness, and that we are merely a fragment of that divine consciousness expressed in physical form.
Conclusion

We may be vastly underestimating the power of our minds, and our true abilities to use them. If our minds can remember entire songs to perfection or orchestral performances that we only heard in passing then what is stopping us from accessing this on a conscious level?
It seems that every single detail of our lives is recorded with our brain, so the question I have is how do we access that information, and from where do we access it?
This evidence provides a truly exciting shift in the way we can view our minds, and more importantly our potential. If an electrode in our brain is able to stimulate such vivid recollection, is it not possibly that we can develop our imagination and our mental abilities to this point naturally so we can use that ability at will?
Is it not possible that there is much more going on during a simple thought process or recollection of an event than we give ourselves credit for? That is exactly what Wilder Penfield found which caused him at the end of his career to see the nature of mind as a field of energy or information which Deepak Chopra (I believe) termed the ‘mind-field’.
What if your essence is not in your brain, or in your body, but in a formless field of energy?

About the Author

Brandon West is the creator of Project Global Awakening. A website dedicated to the research of a variety of scientific and spiritual disciplines, and applying that knowledge to help you live an inspired life and change the world. Follow Project Global Awakening on Facebook, and Twitter.
This article is offered under Creative Commons license. It’s okay to republish it anywhere as long as attribution bio is included and all links remain intact.

 

[muir]

So if we are living in a holographic reality and we are all in fact one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively then we are not the film screen or the figures on the film screen, we are the light that shines through the screen coming from divine source

This would mean that a request can be sent to the source to change what is projected onto the screen which is essentially what 'magick' is about

Its looking as if science is beginning to shift into a new paradigm that will actually be in alignment with what the mystics have told us all along

 

[Lark]

I was thinking, following my time in Paris when I visited the war museams, that perhaps the media strategy which involves self-censorship and misdirection has prevented mass popular movements like nazism and communistic creedos taking hold and leading to massacres national or international?

I mean it has prevented left wing uprisings but it has prevent right wing ones too or any sort really.

 

[muir]

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-s...of-depression-scientists-suggest-9580045.html

[h=1]Psychedelic drugs may help alleviate symptoms of depression, scientists suggest[/h]

[h=3]Psychedelic drugs can have similar effects on the brain as those seen during dreams
[/h]
Charlie Cooper

Health Reporter

Thursday 03 July 2014



The Beatles wrote songs about them and Aldous Huxley said they could be “extremely good for anybody with fixed ideas”. Now scientists are beginning to understand exactly what happens to our brain under the influence of psychedelic drugs, revealing intriguing insights into their well-observed link to creativity.

In a new analysis of a study which saw 15 volunteers undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans while under the influence of psilocybin, the active ingredient of magic mushrooms, scientists have discovered that the patterns of activity seen in their brains bore “fascinating” similarities to those seen when dreaming.
The researchers found that while activity in parts of the brain responsible for high level thinking such as planning and analysing was “disjointed and uncoordinated”, activity in more primitive areas of the brain associated with emotional thinking was much more pronounced.
They also saw that different areas of the brain were able to communicate in “novel” ways, giving the study volunteers a much larger range of potential brain states: something the researchers said could be a physical counterpart to the sensation of “mind expansion” often reported by users of psychedelics such as magic mushrooms, LSD and mescaline.
The study is published in the journal Human Brain Mapping today.
Aldous Huxley, when describing the experience of taking mescaline in his 1954 book The Doors of Perception, said that the experience was like “seeing what Adam saw on the morning of his creation”, and recalled in great detail the “labyrinth of endlessly significant complexity” visible even in the folds of his trousers. He said that the people who could gain most from taking LSD were “professors” because of the insights it could offer.
Scientists at Imperial College are currently researching whether psilocybin may help alleviate symptoms of depression.
Dr Robin Carhart-Harris, from Imperial’s department of medicine, said that the observed ability of psychedelics to give users a level of “emotional insight” was a strong argument for their use in psychotherapy, adding that they may even have a useful role in creative problem solving.
“There may be something in the loosening of the mind that occurs both in dreaming and in the psychedelic state that could be useful in terms of facilitating creative insight,” he said, adding that the scans showed that psychedelics could promote “a more exploratory kind of thinking”.
“Novel connections are made between different ideas and different topics,” he said. “There’s a fluidity and fluency to cognition. Only now are we forming ideas about what that might rest on in terms of changes in brain activity.”
A similar effect may be at work in forming the hallucinations and heightened perception of colour and pattern associated with a psychedelic trip.
“Much of what the brain does when we experience the world is to make predictions,” Dr Carhart-Harris said. “The brain gets quite adept at this and the world becomes more and more familiar and less surprising. Our predictions and our assumptions about the world begin firm up and we experience the world with assurance and confidence.
“What appears to happen with psychedelics is that process goes awry and the brain makes impetuous inferences about the world: this might be the basis of hallucinations. For instance, usually you look at the trunk of a tree and see the trunk of a tree. But on a psychedelic drug we may see a face in the trunk. It may be that the modules of the brain that normally process faces has ‘broken free’ and is making inferences in an impetuous way where there is no sensory evidence to call it up.”
Magic mushrooms are Class A drugs, but Dr Carhart-Harris said that any therapeutic use of psychedelics could be safe if appropriate cautions over dose and environment were observed.
See how they fly: Famed users
Samuel Taylor Coleridge
Coleridge famously composed the poem Kubla Khan after waking from an opium dream caused by “an anodyne” prescribed for an illness. He fell asleep reading about the Mongol emperor Kublai Khan, and dreamed of writing 200 to 300 lines of a poem, with all the images “[rising] up before him like things”. On waking he found he could only remember fragments, which nevertheless survive as one of his best-known poems.
The Beatles
Although conspiracy theories have linked more or less every Beatles song to drug use of one form or another, Paul McCartney has confirmed that the song “Day Tripper” is about LSD. “Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds”, despite featuring imagery reminiscent of a psychedelic trip (“cellophane flowers of yellow and green” etc) and having LSD subliminally in its title, was apparently inspired by a picture drawn by an infant Julian Lennon.
Aldous Huxley
The author of Brave New World was an exponent of the mind-expanding qualities of mescaline, which he first took “one bright May morning” in 1953. He later engaged in a discussion with the psychiatrist Humphrey Osmond about what such drugs should be called – suggesting phanerothymic, from the Greek “visible spirituality”. Osmond won though, with his suggestion ‘psychedelic’: from psyche (soul or mind) and delein (to manifest).

 

[muir]

I was thinking, following my time in Paris when I visited the war museams, that perhaps the media strategy which involves self-censorship and misdirection has prevented mass popular movements like nazism and communistic creedos taking hold and leading to massacres national or international?

I mean it has prevented left wing uprisings but it has prevent right wing ones too or any sort really.

No the corporate network behind the mass media have used both the extreme right AND the extreme left to marshall society in the direction that they want it to go in

You've mentioned 'the conspiracy' but basically that IS the conspiracy

The banking families who control the federal reserve banking system such as the warburgs, the schiffs, the rothschilds etc originated from Germany

As young men the heads of these families studied at the university of Berlin under the philosopher Hegel who taught them 'Hegelian Dialectics' which is to create a synthesis from two polar opposites he called 'thesis' and 'antithesis'

That is the conspiracy...that the network play both ends against the middle

Their influence can be traced to both marxism AND fascism and they use both to drive the world towards their synthesis which is a global totalitarian government which they will control

This is why i'm always talkign about 'false flags' and 'controlled opposition' because that is how these guys operate

This is why so many people are confused right now becuase these guys are literally running rings around the global population....they are the ones making all the plays....they are waging a war against 'terror' but at the same time they are creating, arming and funding the terror groups...its diabolically clever and many people cannot yet conceive that such a manipulative group of people are actually out there...but they are

 

[Lark]

No the corporate network behind the mass media have used both the extreme right AND the extreme left to marshall society in the direction that they want it to go in

You've mentioned 'the conspiracy' but basically that IS the conspiracy

The banking families who control the federal reserve banking system such as the warburgs, the schiffs, the rothschilds etc originated from Germany

As young men the heads of these families studied at the university of Berlin under the philosopher Hegel who taught them 'Hegelian Dialectics' which is to create a synthesis from two polar opposites he called 'thesis' and 'antithesis'

That is the conspiracy...that the network play both ends against the middle

Their influence can be traced to both marxism AND fascism and they use both to drive the world towards their synthesis which is a global totalitarian government which they will control

This is why i'm always talkign about 'false flags' and 'controlled opposition' because that is how these guys operate

This is why so many people are confused right now becuase these guys are literally running rings around the global population....they are the ones making all the plays....they are waging a war against 'terror' but at the same time they are creating, arming and funding the terror groups...its diabolically clever and many people cannot yet conceive that such a manipulative group of people are actually out there...but they are

By the staff of Aaron!

 

[muir]

By the staff of Aaron!

The 'staff' of Aaron hey?

There's a theory that Moses is actually Akhenaton

If you think about it Akhenaton changed the official Egyptian religion from one of multiple 'deities' to one sun god with himself (the pharoah) as its conduit on earth

if you research into freemasonry and the catholic church you fidn that they are both male dominated solar, phallic cults as was akhenatons religion

Egyptian obelisks are stone penis's as are pyramids...they're solar penis's because the mystery schools believe that the sun is the penis of the macroprosopus

The male penis therefore is the microcosmic sun...the emitter of live giving energy (sperm)

This is why freemasons have an apron as a veil over their willy....because it is the holy of holies for them. Its also why their aprons often have a sun depicted on them

The catholic church too is a male mystery school which is why there are no female priests allowed. They're sun worshippers

 

[Lark]

The 'staff' of Aaron hey?

There's a theory that Moses is actually Akhenaton

If you think about it Akhenaton changed the official Egyptian religion from one of multiple 'deities' to one sun god with himself (the pharoah) as its conduit on earth

if you research into freemasonry and the catholic church you fidn that they are both male dominated solar, phallic cults as was akhenatons religion

Egyptian obelisks are stone penis's as are pyramids...they're solar penis's because the mystery schools believe that the sun is the penis of the macroprosopus

The male penis therefore is the microcosmic sun...the emitter of live giving energy (sperm)

This is why freemasons have an apron as a veil over their willy....because it is the holy of holies for them. Its also why their aprons often have a sun depicted on them

The catholic church too is a male mystery school which is why there are no female priests allowed. They're sun worshippers

A "theory", aye, they're a dime a dozen those.

 

[muir]

A "theory", aye, they're a dime a dozen those.

Treat it like a scinetific hypothesis

Start with your theory and then flesh it out...see if it floats

If when you dig deeper you find the theory is full of holes then discard it. But if in the process of digging you find that it stands up to investigation then it can gain more credibility in your mind

The trick is to get as much info as you can to ensure greater accuracy

This is why i encourage people to not only look into the things i say but to also question me on them because i know that if they do that they will find that what i'm saying has been built on sturdy foundations not on mere speculation

that's not to say that i don't speculate sometimes but when i do that i tend to use the kind of language that allows the reader to know that i am not asserting something as fact

 

[Lark]

Treat it like a scinetific hypothesis

Start with your theory and then flesh it out...see if it floats

If when you dig deeper you find the theory is full of holes then discard it. But if in the process of digging you find that it stands up to investigation then it can gain more credibility in your mind

The trick is to get as much info as you can to ensure greater accuracy

This is why i encourage people to not only look into the things i say but to also question me on them because i know that if they do that they will find that what i'm saying has been built on sturdy foundations not on mere speculation

that's not to say that i don't speculate sometimes but when i do that i tend to use the kind of language that allows the reader to know that i am not asserting something as fact

I know your capacity to reason already, disagreement is tantamount to rape, now anyone who unapologetically draws those sorts of conclusions about moral equivalence isnt worth the time of day I'm afraid.

 

[muir]

I know your capacity to reason already, disagreement is tantamount to rape, now anyone who unapologetically draws those sorts of conclusions about moral equivalence isnt worth the time of day I'm afraid.

Thats a missrepresentation of that discussion and anyone can go and read that for themselves and see what was said

But frankly you needed a bit of a wake up call because you were going around calling anyone who disagreed with you 'crazy' which as i pointed out to you is a classic tactic of the frankfurt school, proponants of which you were talking about

So i pointed out to you that you were doing exactly what the frankfurt school always did which was to categorise anyone who didn't share their world view as 'crazy'

I then pointed out to you how this is a method of not only discrediting people but also stigmatising them

I then gave the example of someone accusing someone else falsly of rape and how that would stigmatise someone even though they were innocent of the charge

I stand by everything i said and i was making a very good point that i think you should take on board if you want to be able to discuss these matters in a free and open way with people

Don't go round calling people 'crazy' or mentally deficient just because they disagree with you....not only will that hamper your own process of learning but it also unfairly stigmatises people...so don't do it

if you do it to people don't get your nose out of joint when they point out what you are doing and use examples to illustrate their point

 

[muir]

http://www.zengardner.com/staged-disaster-looms/

[h=1]Staged Disaster Looms[/h]

by Zen Gardner
You have to shake your head and almost laugh at this staged shutdown taking place and all the fear mongering going on. As we know, this is all done by the same sociopaths itching to pull off the next false flag to bump their program into the next gear. They apparently figure, why not prepare ahead of time for the new hyper-draconian measures they’ll mandate in the wake of some horrific new false flag event, or events?
Just look at this staged insanity. After all, anticipation magnifies the desired response, and how convenient to have the perpetrators already identified.

[h=2]Fears terrorists will target planes with computer and human bombs[/h][h=3]Heightened airport security after US terror warning could lead to summer of chaos for holidaymakers[/h]Terrorists are plotting to use new stealth bombs in laptops and even humans to bring down a US-bound passenger plane, it is feared.
Airport security was increased across the UK, US and other countries amid fears al-Qaeda bomb experts have successfully designed a new explosive that can bypass current checks.
They are believed to be targeting the thousands of Western Jihadists fighting in Syria and Iraq as would-be suicide bombers.
The threat, which originated from US intelligence, had an immediate impact at British airports where passengers were subjected to more stringent and rigorous security checks. Source
​

Note “western Jihadists”. While it’s true there are US/NATO/Mossad operatives posing as Islamic separatists, that they have suddenly multiplied into this sophisticated army poised to attack the west is a total, fabricated myth. For a purpose.
[h=3]9/11 Redux – Reinforcing the Meme[/h]The driving force and motives behind all of this are painfully clear.
1. People of the West are tired of war and they need a new incentive, much like PNACs outline for needed popular justification to massively militarize and invade the Middle East via a “new pearl harbor” event and hence 9/11. They need to “re-energize their base and get their minds off of domestic troubles.
2. The wake up is hitting critical mass. The truth about 9/11 and these concocted, engineered wars has been blown wide open on a massive scale and they want to put that fire out. Nothing better than creating a bigger one, or several events, to reinforce the story that the first one was no “hoax” as “certainly the government wouldn’t nuke one of its own cities”, or whatever demonic scheme or schemes they have in the cooker. This is why the Pentagon was one of the 9/11 targets, even though the missile hit the only recently reinforced section of the exterior wall while also conveniently taking out those investigating the trillions in “lost” money announced on the eve of 9/11 by Donald Rumsfeld.
3. This in turn justifies the government going after those who’ve opposed this projected narrative – and with a measure of popular approval. “If this new attack is clearly in no way government perpetrated, then those conspiracy kooks deserve to be locked up as enemies..” sort of thing. Unfortunately, in times of chaos, confusion and fear, however induced, this is how humanity is often swayed.
4. “Naming the Enemy” so you’ll know ahead of time. The extremely sudden advent of this ISIS movement appears almost as an act of desperation on the conspirators’ part, although it’s clear this was planned for some time. Al Qaida has been outed as an arm of the US and has changed sides so often recently that something needed to be rebranded. And boom, along comes ISIS; bigger badder and apparently so suddenly financed and sophisticated they’re able to control aircraft and infiltrate anywhere at will.
Sound familiar? Only this time is in a big hurry. Apparently things haven’t gone as smoothly as they would have liked. Expect a lot of mistakes to be clearly noticeable as they move at this frantic rate. Hence the draconian clampdown on media, communications (coming) and personal movement.
[h=3]New Heights of Fascist Hubris and Hypocrisy[/h]While normal, documented travelers are being grilled, intimidated, searched, surveilled and irradiated, the overland borders of the west have never been so porous for illegal immigration. In fact, the Federal Government in the US is deliberately encouraging, allowing and shipping thousands of immigrants all over the country, even housing them in military installations, no questions asked.
Is anybody paying attention? Apparently seeing the big picture has become so ghastly that no one dares to look.
The disintegration of a once proud people is well under way, while at the same time there apparently is a need to militarily and technologically control those very same people being undermined to make sure nothing goes wrong. Sound like a fascist takeover of a force they fear? Perhaps an intelligent, informed and awakening populace is what they fear the most.
And it is. America is in the process of an engineered meltdown, and in a hurry. Too many forces are converging right now for this waiting for something catastrophic to last much longer. That’s not to breed fear, but awareness…and preparation.
[h=3]The Ominous Month of July[/h]Most astute researchers and awake observers see this current month of July as a very dangerous one. Economically, geopolitically and domestically. While the US stock market soars to ward off any public distrust in the current system and keep the mainstream intoxicated, manipulators behind the scenes are poised to pull the plug at any time.
Just listen to how many times IMF/Rothschild spokesperson Christine Lagarde mentions the word “reset” in this recent talk. A very clever way of letting others know the whole game is about to be changed, with a centralized global power at the helm. (Skip the intro, but notice how vague this woman is, never mind over the charts abject arrogant, as she is in every speech, being the globalist propaganda mouthpiece that she is. But pushing “reset” is clearly her mission. Watch for “rebalancing” as a buzzword as well.)
Video HERE if you care to endure it.
In addition to all that forecasting, here she is giving seeming occult clues as to when this reset is to take place (recently posted on my site):

[video=youtube;QYmViPTndxw]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYmViPTndxw#t=64[/video]

In addition, the patriotic frenzy of July 4th is an emotion they would love to direct, for their clear purpose. Fear, animosity for an alien enemy, insecurity and the rest. I’ll be surprised if they don’t take advantage of such an opportunity on such a pregnant year, as sad as they may seem.
We must be wise.
[h=3]What To Do[/h]Get your money out of the bank and into safe instruments. There will be a bank “holiday” soon, after which withdrawals will be next to impossible and only on their terms. The more independent you can be from this matrix of deceit the better.
Live somewhere safe, or at least prepare with supplies of any sort. When the breakdown happens you’ll be confined to your home, that’s what happens.
Prepare others. While this may seem alarmist, “better to have it and not need it than need it and not have it.”
Remain consciously awake and aware. Times of serious societal stress are hard to endure – it’s not just you, but those around you that are responding, so it’s a world of its own.
Being prepared is a state of mind and heart, as well as action.
Don’t delay.
Much love, Zen
ZenGardner.com

 

[muir]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...nvestigating-Westminster-paedophile-ring.html

[h=1]'More than 10' politicians on list held by police investigating Westminster 'paedophile ring'[/h] [h=2]Whistleblower who prompted Operation Fernbridge says up to 40 MPs and peers knew about or took part in child abuse[/h]

Cyril Smith is among the politicians on a list of names held by police investigating historic child abuse Photo: REX FEATURES









By Gordon Rayner, and David Barrett

10:00PM BST 04 Jul 2014



More than 10 current and former politicians are on a list of alleged child abusers held by police investigating claims of a Westminster paedophile ring.

MPs or peers from all three main political parties are on the list, which includes former ministers and household names.

Several, including Cyril Smith and Sir Peter Morrison, are no longer alive, but others are still active in Parliament.

The existence of the list was disclosed by Peter McKelvie, the whistleblower whose claims prompted Operation Fernbridge, the Scotland Yard investigation into allegations of a paedophile network with links to Downing Street.

Mr McKelvie, a retired child protection team manager who has spent more than 20 years compiling evidence of alleged abuse by authority figures, said he believed there was enough evidence to arrest at least one senior politician.

[h=2]Related Articles[/h]

• Legal expert to examine claims of Home Office paedophile cover up
  05 Jul 2014
• Now men are expected to have perfect beach bodies
  05 Jul 2014
• Monty Python: Will the wrinkly revolutionaries have the last laugh?
  05 Jul 2014
• Timothy Spall's slow boat to the red carpet at Cannes
  05 Jul 2014
• Senior Tory stopped with child sex videos 'was reprieved'
  04 Jul 2014
• Scotland Yard launches investigation into historic claims of child abuse
  18 Jan 2013

It comes as David Cameron ordered the most senior civil servant at the Home Office to conduct a fresh investigation into what happened to a missing dossier on alleged paedophiles in Westminster in the 1980s.
The Prime Minister told Mark Sedwill, the Permanent Secretary at the Home Office, to “do everything he can” to clear up what happened to the file, which was handed to the then home secretary Leon (now Lord) Brittan by the late Geoffrey Dickens MP.
Separately Theresa May, the Home Secretary, said yesterday she would “examine the case” for a public inquiry into historical child abuse in public life, for which 139 MPs have now called.
Mr McKelvie, who helped bring the notorious paedophile Peter Righton to justice in 1992 when he worked in Hereford and Worcester child protection team, said: “I believe there are sufficient grounds to carry out a formal investigation into allegations of up to 20 MPs and Lords over the last three to four decades, some still alive and some dead. The list is there.”
In a letter to his local MP Sir Tony Baldry last month, Mr McKelvie suggested that a further 20 MPs and Lords were implicated in the “cover-up” of abuse of children.
Mr McKelvie, who has compiled a dossier of evidence by speaking to alleged victims and care workers with whom they are in contact, does not suggest that any of the MPs and Lords colluded with each other.
It was as a result of information provided by Mr McKelvie that the Labour MP Tom Watson raised the issue of child abuse at Prime Minister’s Questions in October 2012. He spoke of “clear intelligence suggesting a powerful paedophile network linked to Parliament and Number 10” that arose from the Righton case.
Following Mr Watson’s intervention, the Metropolitan Police began Operation Fernbridge, an ongoing investigation into allegations of sex abuse at the Elm Guest House in Barnes, south London.
At least one witness is understood to have told police in the 1980s that he was abused by a Tory MP at the guest house when he was aged under 10, but the alleged victim has so far refused to give a sworn a witness statement to the police.
The Metropolitan Police has consistently said it is “not prepared to give a running commentary on Operation Fernbridge, which is an ongoing operation”.
Earlier this week it emerged that a dossier on an alleged Westminster paedophile network compiled by the late MP Geoffrey Dickens went missing after it was handed to the former home secretary Lord Brittan in 1983.
Simon Danczuk, the Labour MP who raised questions about the dossier, said yesterday he had received a dozen new allegations naming the same politician this week.
He and six other MPs have written to Mrs May demanding a public inquiry, and in her reply Mrs May said “nothing has been ruled out”, adding: “Once the criminal investigations have concluded, I will thoroughly examine the case for an inquiry into the matters you have raised.”
Speaking about the Dickens dossier, the Prime Minister said he understood the concerns about the missing file.
He said: “That's why I've asked the permanent secretary at the Home Office to do everything he can to find answers to all of these questions and to make sure we can reassure people about these events.
"So it's right that these investigations are made. We mustn't do anything, of course, that could prejudice or prevent proper action by the police.
"If anyone has information about criminal wrong-doing they should, of course, give it to the police."
Yesterday The Daily Telegraph disclosed that a senior Tory who is being investigated as part of Operation Fernbridge was allegedly stopped by a customs officer with child pornography in the 1980s.
The customs officer who made the seizure can now be named as Maganlal Solanki, 76, who said at his home in Leicester yesterday: “I don't want to go over it all. It's very disturbing for me. I've been told not to say anything by my department."
Asked about the senior Tory, who was never arrested over the alleged child pornography seizure, Mr Solanki said: “Well, that is just a matter for him.”

 

[muir]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...f-depraved-diplomat-protected-good-great.html

How the Establishment hid the monster in their midst: As MPs demand an inquiry into the covering-up of a VIP child abuse ring, chilling proof of how this depraved diplomat was protected by the good and the great

• Sir Peter Hayman was a respected diplomat and army officer given an MBE
  
• But he hid a secret life as a member of the Paedophile Information Exchange
• The group encouraged child abuse - but he was let off with a caution
  
• Tory MP Geoffrey Dickens raised issue of Sir Peter's abuse in Commons
  
• There were strenuous attempts by Whitehall and Whitehall to stop Dickens
  
• Hayman affair in spotlight amid pressure for alleged paedophile ring inquiry
• Involves a missing dossier handed to former home secretary Leon Brittan
  
• Allegedly contained child abuse allegations involving Establishment figures
  

By Richard Pendlebury and Stephen Wright
Published: 01:38, 5 July 2014 | Updated: 15:51, 5 July 2014

Sir Peter Hayman’s life was one decorated with worthy acronyms and exclusive memberships.
By the time of his retirement from ‘the Diplomatic’, the Stowe and Oxford-educated former Rifle Brigade officer had been a Home and Foreign Office mandarin, working closely with the intelligence services at the height of the Cold War: it has even been suggested he was a senior figure in MI6.
His final posting was as High Commissioner to Canada.
As a result of these labours he was made a Knight Commander of the Order of St Michael and St George (KCMG), Commander of the Royal Victorian Order (CVO) and an MBE.
Off duty he also belonged to the MCC and the Army and Navy private members’ club (The Rag). Like Sir Peter, both were pillars of London’s old-school-tie Establishment.
Yet unlike the MCC, there was no distinguishing neckwear at Sir Peter’s rather more discreet third ‘club’, to which he seems to have devoted most physical energy and expense as a pensioner newly returned from post-colonial duties in Ottawa.
His membership number was ‘330’ and this organisation of similarly minded if not gilded individuals was called the Paedophile Information Exchange. It had been formed almost exactly 200 years after the MCC.
PIE supported and encouraged illegal sexual relationships between adults and children. In other words, child abuse.
Sir Peter lived with his wife of 40 years in a lovely home in South Oxfordshire where, in a parallel existence, he was deputy chairman of the Conservative Association. He acted as a churchwarden’s assistant, and opened the local fete.
Everyone there thought he was marvellous. Who was to know otherwise?
That was because his official PIE literature and graphic correspondence with fellow paedophiles was by squalid necessity sent to a flat at 95 Linden Gardens, Notting Hill Gate, London, some 50 miles away.
The ex-diplomat had rented it for that purpose — as well as extra-marital sexual liaisons — under the name of Peter Henderson. The fact that the flat was almost across the road from the Soviet embassy was simply an irony. How the KGB would have loved to have made blackmail use of his peccadillo.
Then Sir Peter made a mistake. He left a packet of paedophile material in an envelope on a London bus. It was addressed to Mr Henderson at Linden Gardens in Notting Hill. A fellow passenger was curious. The package came into the possession of the police.

More...

• Cameron orders a probe into VIP child sex abuse - but only seven detectives are investigating explosive claims
• Nonchalant Rolf Harris and a bizarre river trip to court: Shamed paedophile entertainer delivers one last insult to his tormented victims

Soon afterwards, in November 1978, they raided the Linden Gardens flat.
What they found was a huge trove of revolting paedophilia and other extreme pornography. Among it was a library of 45 substantial diaries in which Sir Peter had recorded in detail his sexual experiences and fantasies, the latter including sex with minors.
There was also substantial correspondence with other PIE members — 111 pages in one instance — in which they shared their otherwise secret desires and other graphic paedophile material.


Police later found that two of the dozen or so paedophiles in Sir Peter’s epistolary circle had been writing to each other about their interest in the extreme sexual torture and murder of children.
Even the hardened cops of the Obscene Publications Squad were ‘revolted’ by the Linden Gardens haul.
When interviewed, Sir Peter — a man who had been deputy commandant of the British zone in Berlin and was later tasked to tear a strip off the Soviet ambassador to London after Moscow crushed the Prague Spring of 1968 — broke down and wept.

+5

Decorated: Sir Peter, wearing his medals, with Lady Hayman, his wife of 40 years

He would surely be exposed and his reputation ruined. All those official laurels would be for naught.
And yet he wasn’t.
Much to the anger and disbelief of the Obscene Publications Squad he was let off with a caution. The grounds for this decision certainly seem extraordinary to contemporary eyes. The Director of Public Prosecutions deemed that as the paedophile material sent through the post by Sir Peter and his friends had not been ‘unsolicited’ nor traded for profit, no offence had taken place worthy of prosecution.
The result? Save among a few officers at Scotland Yard, Sir Peter’s reputation remained intact and might have remained so until his death in 1992 had he not been later exposed in parliament.
The Hayman affair came back into the spotlight this week, with David Cameron ordering an investigation into an alleged cover-up of a VIP paedophile ring which included leading figures in Westminster and Whitehall.
The matter was raised by campaigning MP Simon Danczuk, and centres on a dossier of child sex allegations involving senior Establishment figures, which was handed to the then Home Secretary Leon Brittan by fellow Tory MP Geoffrey Dickens in November 1983.
Lord Brittan says that he passed the documents on to Whitehall officials. But no action was taken and the Home Office has admitted that the Dickens dossier was subsequently destroyed.
The peer faces increasing pressure to fully explain both his handling of the dossier and what it contained. Mark Sedwill, the current permanent secretary at the Home Office, has been given until Monday to explain what the department did with the information the dossier contained.
For his part, Dickens was always convinced there had been a high-level cover-up of VIP paedophilia. The rough treatment he received when in March 1981 he used the legal protection of parliamentary privilege to name Sir Peter Hayman in the Commons, and ask about the security risk his paedophile activities might have posed, is certainly instructive of the Establishment attitude of the time.
He would surely be exposed and his reputation ruined. All those official laurels would be for nothing. And yet he wasn't


In the immediate aftermath of Dickens’ outing of Hayman, the letters page of the Times newspaper gave some flavour of the ranks closing against the campaigner, whom some clearly saw as a working-class oik from a far-flung constituency in the North of England. The fact that he was exposing a member of a paedophile ring which sexually exploited children seemed incidental.
‘Until a week ago, only a few unfortunates in Huddersfield had heard of Mr Geoffrey Dickens and no one who has watched him performing his stunt can have supposed that he has one scintilla of Sir Peter Hayman’s unselfish ability,’ wrote R P T Davenport-Hines. ‘Mischievous avidity for headlines is no substitute for talent or hard work.’
Mr Davenport-Hines is now an eminent historian.
In a similar vein one Julian Fellowes, himself the son of a senior British diplomat, wrote: ‘Thoroughly revolted as I am by the Paedophiliac Society with all its professed aims, I feel I cannot be alone this week in being almost as disgusted by the spectacle of a Tory MP dangling his victim over the slavering jaws of the media.
‘The feeblest student of human nature must surely be aware of how slight the connexion between pornography and practices need be.
‘To flirt with fetishes is hardly rare in the best circles . . . now he has to have his life, public and private, more thoroughly smashed than if he had murdered his kinsman in broad daylight.
‘It is particularly depressing that Salem-like justice should be meted out by a Conservative Party (MP) . . .  their one faintly convincing battle cry has always been the importance of championing the rights of the individual against the so-called good of the faceless, heartless state.’
What of the rights of the children featured in the pornography, some might wonder.
Today the Oscar winner and Downton Abbey creator is a Tory peer — Lord Fellowes of West Stafford. He is married to a lady-in-waiting.
Prior to Dickens naming Hayman, there had also been strenuous attempts by leading figures in Westminster and Whitehall to prevent him from doing so.
The then Attorney General Sir Michael Havers argued with him outside the Commons chamber for 20 minutes before the disclosure of Hayman’s name in written questions.
Dickens later argued: ‘I have had to consider a gentleman with a very distinguished career for which he was many times honoured, and his family.
‘But I have also to consider the parents whose children are procured, sometimes for a bag of sweets, to perform sexual acts and pose for sexual photographs.’

+5

+5



Sir Peter pictured outside Reading Magistrates' Court where he faced a charge of gross indecency - for which he was let off with a caution



The parliamentary record Hansard shows that Liberal leader David Steel also spoke out in the House against Dickens’ use of parliamentary privilege to name the paedophile diplomat in written questions.
‘As a member of the Select Committee on Privileges I am naturally concerned that parliamentary privilege should at all times be defended,’ said Steel. ‘I submit it is difficult to defend if there is a sign on occasion it is being abused.
‘I want to draw your attention to two questions which have appeared on the Order Paper today naming a retired public servant and asking for further inquiries into his activities.’
He added: ‘I would like to suggest to you this is creating a dubious precedent of which we should be careful.’
The Times reported that the Liberals said Mr Steel was merely expressing the doubts felt by many MPs.
We know now, of course, that Mr Steel and his Liberal Party failed to recognise the paedophile activities of their own MP Cyril Smith, who is believed to have been named in the dossier Dickens later handed to Brittan. Police recently confirmed that Smith was also a visitor to the notorious Elm Guest House in South-West London, where paedophile parties were allegedly held.
At the time, Steel and the Liberals did nothing, and Smith took his secrets and good reputation to the grave.
To shouts of ‘old school tie’ from Labour MP Christopher Price, Sir Michael Havers had to explain to the House why Hayman had not been prosecuted along with other members of PIE in a trial which had ended at the Old Bailey the previous week with the former PIE chairman Tom O’Carroll being jailed for two years for conspiracy to corrupt public morals.
Hayman’s alias of ‘Mr Henderson’ and his collection of paedophile material and diaries had been alluded to in O’Carroll’s committal hearings, but his true identity was suppressed.
(O’Carroll’s prosecution had been criticised by the National Council for Civil Liberties, to which PIE was affiliated. The NCCL’s legal officer at the time was Harriet Harman, now Deputy Labour Leader. She refuses to apologise for the NCCL’s links with PIE.)

+5

The Hayman affair came back into the spotlight this week, amid growing pressure for an inquiry into an alleged cover-up of a paedophile ring in Westminster in the 1980s, involving a missing dossier handed to former home secretary Leon Brittan



Sir Michael explained that Hayman himself had escaped prosecution not because of ‘special treatment’, but because he had not sat on PIE’s executive committee. Dickens claimed that police investigating PIE in 1978 had been ‘absolutely staggered’ that Hayman was not charged.
But the Establishment did then take some action — against the whistleblowers.
The DPP ordered the Metropolitan Police to carry out a leak inquiry into who had given Hayman’s name to Dickens. It was assumed — probably correctly — that the ‘culprit’ was a member of the Obscene Publications squad who had seen the diplomat’s collection at first hand.
Police quizzed Dickens for 45 minutes. He would not tell. A Tory MP even tried to table a motion to force Dickens to reveal his source.
Last night Barry Dickens, the son of Geoffrey Dickens, who died in 1995, said he was disgusted by the backlash against his father at the time of the Hayman affair.
‘I find some of these views quite shocking,’ he said. ‘To defend the odious Peter Hayman, who used his diplomatic bag to carry pictures of children, and I understand in some cases babies in prams, being abused is quite sickening.
‘Julian Fellowes has used flowery language to defend the indefensible and to praise the gutter. David Steel’s Liberal Party was giving sanctuary to the child-abusing monster Cyril Smith. If they have a shred of decency, they will retract their remarks and apologise for attacking my father who was a man of proven integrity.’
Yesterday, Lord Fellowes told the Mail: ‘My position today is exactly the same as it was 30 years ago — I abhor paedophilia in any form, but I think these matters should be decided in a court of law.’
Will we ever know the truth about Establishment paedophiles in the Eighties, and to what extent their activities were covered up?
The Mail can reveal that despite extensive inquiries over the past 20 months, no record of the Dickens dossier being passed to the Metropolitan Police in the mid-Eighties, let alone investigated, has been found by Yard detectives.
Operation Fairbank, the umbrella name for several historic child abuse inquiries relating to PIE, Elm Guest House and a children’s home in South-West London in the Seventies, has been staffed by just seven detectives since it was launched in November 2012.
Compare this with 200 or so detectives tasked with probing alleged media crime around this time, and the 30 or so officers deployed on the post Jimmy Savile scandal inquiry, Operation Yewtree, it is not difficult to understand why sceptics believe the alleged Westminster paedophile ring which operated in the Eighties continues to be covered up.
Certainly there are grounds to suspect that PIE had established a foothold in the Home Office during this period.
A whistleblower has told police that PIE had received grants totalling £70,000 from the Home Office. This person told the Yard he witnessed a successful three-year grant renewal application for £35,000 in 1980, implying that a similar grant had been made in 1977.
PIE leader Steven Adrian Smith (who replaced the jailed Tom O’Carroll), even used a telephone number in the Home Office building as a contact point for the child-sex-supporting organisation, while he was working there as an electrical contractor on behalf of a firm called Complete Maintenance Ltd.
According to his own account, Smith stored paperwork in cabinets at the Home Office and received full security clearance from Scotland Yard.
Smith later went on the run while facing child porn charges. He fled to Holland where he claimed asylum, on the grounds that he was part of an ‘oppressed’ minority campaigning for changes in the UK law.
He cited PIE’s long association with the NCCL. Smith won his asylum plea, but was arrested and jailed on his return to the UK in 1991.
Last night, a man in his 40s who alleges he was a victim of abuse at an institution probed by Scotland Yard, told us: ‘The Government and all its agencies need to wake up and realise that without a proper independent inquiry into historic child sex abuse, the guilty will be left in peace whilst a mass group of traumatised survivors will continue unsupported and tortured by our experiences.’

​

​

 

[muir]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/10947647/Rolf-Harris-Jailed-for-five-years-and-nine-months-but-shows-no-remorse.html

Rolf Harris: Jailed for five years and nine months but shows no remorse

Rolf Harris is told he only has himself to blame as he is jailed for five years and nine months for a string of appalling child sex offences

Photo: JULIAN SIMMONDS








By Martin Evans, Crime Correspondent

6:00AM BST 05 Jul 2014



There was mounting anger after Rolf Harris was jailed for less than six years for a string of appalling child sex offences that devastated the lives of his victims.

Child protection campaigners were so angered by the sentence, which means Harris could be freed in just over two and a half years, that the Attorney General was asked to reconsider the case.

In a withering assessment of his appalling crimes, the judge who presided over his trial, Mr Justice Sweeney, told Harris his reputation now lay in ruin but added: “You only have yourself to blame.”

Harris was convicted of 12 counts of indecent assault against four girls, the youngest of who was just eight-years old at the time.

Victims gave heart breaking impact statements to the court in which they outlined the devastating legacy the crimes had had on their lives.

Related Articles

• Rolf Harris: Anger over lenient sentence
  05 Jul 2014
• Harris: 'unduly lenient' sentence referred to Attorney General
  04 Jul 2014
• Revealed: Rolf Harris downloaded indecent images of children
  04 Jul 2014
• Pay-outs could cost Rolf Harris £11m fortune
  02 Jul 2014
• CPS defends decision to keep suspects' identities secret
  01 Jul 2014

One of women, who had been best friends with his daughter Bindi, described how Harris had groomed her and used her like “his little toy” leaving her a quivering wreck who became an alcoholic while still a teenager.
Another of his victims, Tonya Lee, who was a 15-year-old aspiring actress when Harris groped her in a London pub, described how the attack had been the turning point in her life, robbing her of the ability to ever feel safe again.
The woman who was attacked as an eight-year-old said the assault had ruined her childhood, leaving her unable to express herself and unable to trust men.
She said she had carried what he did to her for most of her life adding: “On that day and in the space of a few minutes my childhood innocence was gone.”
Harris, who earlier travelled from his Bray home by boat, sat in the glass-walled dock at Southwark Crown Court with a striped suitcase by his side.
He remained virtually impassive as sentence was passed, with his daughter watching from the public gallery.
His frail wife Alwen did not attend court, despite having been there for much of the eight week trial.
Mr Justice Sweeney told Harris: “For well over 50 years you have been a popular entertainer and television personality of international standing – with a speciality in children’s entertainment. You are also an artist of renown.
“You have been the recipient of a number of honours and awards over the years. You have done many good and charitable works and numerous people have attested to your positive good character.
“But the verdicts of the jury show that in the period from 1969 to 1986 you were also a sex offender – committing 12 offences of indecent assault on 4 victims who were variously aged between 8 and 19 at the time.”
He went on: “You took advantage of the trust placed in you, because of your celebrity status, to commit the offences against three of your victims.
“In every case the age gap between you and your victim was a very considerable one. You clearly got a thrill from committing the offences whilst others were present or nearby.
“Whilst such others did not realise what you were doing, their presence added to the ordeal of your victims.”
The judge added: “You have shown no remorse for your crimes at all. Your reputation now lies in ruins, you have been stripped of your honours but you have no one to blame but yourself.”
It can now be revealed that Harris had also been facing four charges of possessing indecent images of children.
Police who raided his home in 2012 found the images stored on his computer.
But the Crown Prosecution Service announced it did not intend to pursue the charges.
However since the trial began scores of other potential victims have come forward, claiming to have been abused by Harris in the past.
It raises the prospect of further charges in the future.
Harris is the second high profile person to be jailed as part of the Metropolitan Police’s Operation Yewtree investigation, which was launched in the wake of the Jimmy Savile scandal.
Earlier this year, the PR expert Max Clifford was sentenced to eight years in prison for a string of sex attacks.
Peter Watt, director of national services at the NSPCC, accused Harris of treating the trial like another of his performances.
He said: “Harris was opportunistic and brazen in targeting young girls and women. He took advantage of their trust in him and we heard through the evidence of his courageous victims just how profoundly damaging his abuse was on them for decades after.”
He added: “Harris has not shown any remorse for what he has done and treated the whole court case like just another performance. Thankfully the jury saw through this charade and he will now have a considerable amount of time to reflect on the impact of his crimes.”

 

[muir]

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/nick-clegg-dismisses-calls-inquiry-3806172

[h=1]Nick Clegg DISMISSES calls for inquiry into alleged Westminster paedophile ring[/h]

[h=2]The Deputy Prime Minister says it is a matter for the police as Labour slammed the Home Office’s “lamentable” response[/h]




PA

At odds with majority: More than 130 MPs have backed inquiry into historic child sex offending Complacent Nick Clegg has dismissed calls for an inquiry into an alleged 1980s Westminster paedophile ring — as victims threaten legal action.
Ministers are under pressure to act after admitting an explosive dossier, handed to former Home Secretary Leon Brittan in 1983, has disappeared.
Labour today slammed the Home Office’s “lamentable” response and called for a full inquiry.
And shadow crime minister Diana Johnson insisted: “A proper investigation is needed into these allegations.”
Keith Vaz, chairman of the Commons Home Affairs Committee, has written to the Home Office demanding answers.
But Deputy Prime Minister Mr Clegg, who once worked for Lord Brittan in Brussels, ignored talk of an inquiry, saying said: “I just want the truth to come out and justice to be done.
“When we’re dealing with allegations of such a serious criminal nature, I don’t think there’s any surrogate for allowing the police to get to the bottom of what happened.”
More than 130 MPs back calls for an overarching inquiry into historic child sex offending in the UK.
Campaigning MP Simon Danczuk said this week there were “questions to answer” about the missing 50-page dossier on an alleged VIP paedophile ring.
Lord Brittan, now a Tory peer, insisted on Wednesday he passed the document to Home Office officials but heard nothing further.
Yet a Home Office probe last year found the dossier no longer exists.
Lawyers for alleged victims from the notorious Elm guesthouse in south-west London said legal action was being considered against the Home Office.
Alison Millar, from law firm Leigh Day, said: “My clients are incredulous.
“It seems inconceivable that a document of such importance can have simply disappeared.”
Downing Street insisted anyone one with information about abuse should go to the police.

​

​

 

[muir]

Learys 8 circuits of consciousness...'it's evolution baby!'

[video=youtube;e0p7TC2mHRI]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0p7TC2mHRI[/video]

 

[muir]

The Frankfurt School

The frankfurt school was a jewish marxist school of thought whose sole aim was the destruction of capitalist society

To achieve this aim they created something called 'critical theory' which basically means to criticise EVERY single area of capitalist life with a view to undermining capitalism society; the other ploy used by the Frankfurt School was and still is to call anyone who questions them 'crazy' to discredit them.

As marxists they are materialists who deny God and deny faith

They believe in a society where the economy and society itself is controlled by a powerful central authority...this is called a 'planned economy'

Examples of centrally controlled economies would include the USSR and Nazi germany; under these societies the mass of people are all treated as workers who are to carry out the dictats of the central authority which is the ruling party (there are no votes or democracy)

Because the system is dehumanising for many of the workers who are coerced into doing things they don't want to do the central authorities have to create a police state in order to be ready to squash any dissent from the disgruntled public

This concept of such a society is extremely attractive to powerful people because they can become the ruling party that rules over the rest of society whislt protecting themselves with the apparatus of state such as the police, intelligence agencies and the military

In the west a group of jewish central bankers pre-eminant amongst which are the rothschilds have been funding and supporting the frankfurt school who moved to the US to escape the nazis; they also funded trotsky (who came to new york to meet them) and lenin and provided them with men to help them in a 'Bolshevik' revolution in russia which then saw the murder of millions of slavs

These bankers had agreed to work together and created a cartel which then formed a partnership with the US government called the 'federal reserve bank'

The bankers branched out into many differents areas owning corporations in the media (including newspapers, radio, TV and hollywood), oil, big pharma as well as heavily investing in psychiatry and education

The bankers want to subvert free market capitalism and other forms of decentralised society because they want to rule the rest of society so they liked the ideas of the frankfurt school and they funded them and gave them posts in the universities which they set up and funded

The aim is now to dismantle western society in order to create a new society

This is done in many different ways and the 'sexual revolution' was in fact largely driven by the CIA who also supplied much of the LSD that kick started the revolution, created by big pharma

The destruction of national soveriengty is required because the marxist vision is for a global government so borders are eroded through treaties and the movements of people over borders

Popular culture is used to basically mess with peoples heads for example pop music is heavily sexualised to unbalance the young children who consume it, computer games contain graphic violence and films such as 'gorno' (gore-porno) films are churned out to subvert people

Hollywood is heavily influenced by the cartel and it also creates films that distort reality, distort history and basically mess with peoples heads by giving them unrealistic expectations of reality; the same goes for television

The public are encouraged to divide along many fracture lines...the cartel do this by many means for example by creating militant minority rights movements such as feminism, gay rights and black rights and so on. They also use religion eg christian v's muslim narratives, east v's west narratives, 'clash of civilisation narratives' and politics for example the false left v's right paradigm

Now i agree in equality and that changes needed to happen in our society so i'm not against movements for social change per se but often it becomes evident that some of these groups are not really trying to create an equal and inclusive society but rather they are geared towards pitting groups of people against each other., which is why some women are even distancing themself from feminism. The media hyped 'battle of the sexes' is a prime example as the marxists sabateurs have now managed to pit men and women against each other leading to massive family meltdown asd the society fractures leading to untold numbers of stories of relationship strife, family strife, children losing role models etc etc

The psychological/philosophical justification for this marxist meltdown of society has come from the work of freud who was the prophet of this new age of consumerism telling us all that we were animals driven purely by self interest which has created a divided and suspicious society where everyone is alienated, lost, hopeless and absorbed in their latest technological gadget

However in societies unaffected by the cartel such as the amish the society manages despite being surrounded by chaos to work as a community

We are living through the destruction of the very fabric of our society and the proof is all around us and can be heard in the stories told by people on this forum...and its only going to get worse!

This all puts me in a very complicated position regarding my politics which has confused some that i talk with

On one hand i WANT SOCIETY TO CHANGE and i WANT EQUAL RIGHTS FOR ALL PEOPLE but on the other hand i know that the wider change that the cartel want to make is NOT THE CHANGE i want to see

So although i often support change and i engage myself in the criticism of capitalist society i am NOT one of them

I want to live in a society where power is decentralised down to the people, where everyone has a say in the running of things and where people are free to do what they want to do

I'd like to see a society where individual freedoms are protected and yet community is still strong and healthy....this is not the direction we are going in

We are going in a direction where we are losing our individual freedoms as a police state emerges and where community is broken down into the cult of me,me,me on the road to a homogenous, drugged and heavily regulated society of conformity to ultimate and all pervasive authority

I do however believe that such a future can still be averted but only through the conscious, aware and informed choice of the public

A quick word on the 'jewish' aspect here.....the people i refer to are not jews in the sense that they are not god fearing...they are secular and that is why zionism is secular and why many god fearing jews oppose zionism. They are ashkenazi materialists

They are what some would term the 'synagogue of satan' ie those that pretend to be somethig that they are not; they will often hide behind a 'jewish' identity

 

[muir]

A pop music video by propaganda queen madonna

In this video she is depicted as being tortured and describes breaking down her ego

breaking down the ego and breaking down society is the aim of the frankfurt school to make us all into pliable homogenised mass produced clones

She also fights herself in a battle between light and dark showing her inner struggles

This is a qabalistic theme and madonna is a well known qabalist

Hebrew letters feature on her arm and on the chair at the end of the video

@2:00 is a shattered mirror symbolising her fractured psyche

The media makes icons of the propagandists who are then put forward into the spotlight as role models for young people to emulate in their behaviours

@1:00 she suddenly turns to the camera and randomly says 'sigmund freud' in an almost subliminal whispering tone:

[video=youtube;QXXEpNa3CqQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QXXEpNa3CqQ[/video]

 

[muir]

Federal reserve bill: