[INFJ] Coronavirus (Covid-19) vaccination and the magnetic phenomenon could be explained by Graphene Oxide

just saying.....https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-021-06348-5
Intervention
Patients were randomized to ivermectin (N = 250) or placebo (N = 251) arms in a staggered dose, according to the patient’s weight, for 2 days.

Main outcomes and measures
The efficacy of ivermectin to prevent hospitalizations was evaluated as primary outcome. We evaluated secondary outcomes in relationship to safety and other efficacy end points.

Results
The mean age was 42 years (SD ± 15.5) and the median time since symptom onset to the inclusion was 4 days [interquartile range 3–6]. The primary outcome of hospitalization was met in 14/250 (5.6%) individuals in ivermectin group and 21/251 (8.4%) in placebo group (odds ratio 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.32–1.31; p = 0.227). Time to hospitalization was not statistically different between groups. The mean time from study enrollment to invasive mechanical ventilatory support (MVS) was 5.25 days (SD ± 1.71) in ivermectin group and 10 days (SD ± 2) in placebo group, (p = 0.019). There were no statistically significant differences in the other secondary outcomes including polymerase chain reaction test negativity and safety outcomes.

Limitations
Low percentage of hospitalization events, dose of ivermectin and not including only high-risk population.

Conclusion
Ivermectin had no significant effect on preventing hospitalization of patients with COVID-19. Patients who received ivermectin required invasive MVS earlier in their treatment. No significant differences were observed in any of the other secondary outcomes.
Click to expand...
Conclusion
Ivermectin had no significant effect on preventing hospitalization of patients with COVID-19. Patients who received ivermectin required invasive MVS earlier in their treatment. No significant differences were observed in any of the other secondary outcomes.
 
FiftySeven said:
just saying.....https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-021-06348-5

Conclusion
Ivermectin had no significant effect on preventing hospitalization of patients with COVID-19. Patients who received ivermectin required invasive MVS earlier in their treatment. No significant differences were observed in any of the other secondary outcomes.
Click to expand...

Lol.....now I am positive this has NO correlation but.......there may just be the tiniest fly in the ointment. BMC is a division of Springer Nature which by dumb happenstance is wholly owned by Neuberger Berman (they invest and hence make money for people via their investments).
Shockingly (I was just dumb founded) that they just happen to have a few dollars invested in Pharmaceutical companies!

As of 6/30/21 in American dollars:

Pfizer: 333,765,000
Johnson and Johnson: 760,374,000
Medtronic: 496,554,000
West Pharmaceutical: 456,134,000
Regeneron: 409,598,000
Bristol Myers: 253,380,000
Emergent Biosolutions: 214,140,000
Eli Lily: 210,570,000
Astrazeneca: 179,771,000
Alexis pharmaceutical: 141,192,000
Merck: 40,025,000
Moderna: 14,962,000
This list does NOT include health care companies.

I am confident that Corporate would have no problem having a subsidiary put $4.5+ BILLION at risk.

Pulease
 
larry806q said:
Me bad......I read the chart too quickly.....sorry.
Click to expand...
No worries.

It is pretty compelling, huh?

You know what I just heard? We are giving Afghani's that have been rescued and brought to the States ivermectin.

So, the US suppresses its use on its own citizens and coerces us to get the jab and does the above. A 100% violation of the Declaration of Independence.
 
o2b said:
No worries.

It is pretty compelling, huh?

You know what I just heard? We are giving Afghani's that have been rescued and brought to the States ivermectin.

So, the US suppresses its use on its own citizens and coerces us to get the jab and does the above. A 100% violation of the Declaration of Independence.
Click to expand...
They've been doing this for refugees for decades now. It's part of the process for refugees coming from certain areas. There is a whole immunization schedule. This isn't some new thing they've just started doing with people from Afghanistan. It's given specifically for Strongyloides.

Americans can get a prescription for ivermectin as well so I don't see what the big deal is?

The entire background and reasoning is right on the CDC website.

https://www.cdc.gov/immigrantrefugeehealth/guidelines/overseas-guidelines.html
 
^
Yes, @SpecialEdition, I researched for the source and saw the cdc page. So, it is no conspiracy.

But, I believe suppressing ivermectin for covid must be.
 
o2b said:
No worries.

It is pretty compelling, huh?

You know what I just heard? We are giving Afghani's that have been rescued and brought to the States ivermectin.

So, the US suppresses its use on its own citizens and coerces us to get the jab and does the above. A 100% violation of the Declaration of Independence.
Click to expand...
Do you mean that the US gives it to Afghans that have been rescued and brought to the US in order to treat Covid or to get rid of intestinal worms?
 
o2b said:
^
Yes, @SpecialEdition, I researched for the source and saw the cdc page. So, it is no conspiracy.

But, I believe suppressing ivermectin for covid must be.
Click to expand...
This is such a uniquely American perspective lol.

It's not even a conversation people are having where I'm from so I find it all bizarre.
 
b83
 
FiftySeven said:
Do you mean that the US gives it to Afghans that have been rescued and brought to the US in order to treat Covid or to get rid of intestinal worms?
Click to expand...
It appears to me the reason is not covid. I bothered to source after posting.
 
SpecialEdition said:
This is such a uniquely American perspective lol.

It's not even a conversation people are having where I'm from so I find it all bizarre.
Click to expand...
Are you aware, @SpecialEdition, that a rigorous examination of the kind of posts you respond to in contrast with those you do not appears to correlate strongly to selectivity bias?
 
SpecialEdition said:
Oh, I don't care!

I respond to what I feel like, and I don't respond to things that I don't.

Freedom, am I right?
Click to expand...
Absolutely and I couldn't possibly agree more.

I don't watch sports much anymore. Less passion than I used to have. But, having grown up in Milwaukee, I watched their NBA team, the Milwaukee Bucks, in the championship finals. They ended up winning the championship for the second time in history, the first time being 50 years ago.

In the final game, Giannis Antetokounmpo (is that ever a tough name to spell!), had a monster game. Some said it may have been the greatest finals winning performance ever. 50 points, lots of rebounds, blocked shots. He was something like 17-19 from the free throw line.

It's like if someone was tasked with showcasing his performance with video and all that was shown were his two missed free throws.

That is what it is like.

Again, I could not agree more. Freedom.
 
Last edited:
I have been late on the ivermectin facet of this whole covid nightmare.

The swine flu vaccine in the 1970's was terminated for use after 24 deaths. In the US we have over 10,000 vaccine deaths. Over 100,000 vaccine injured. Meanwhile, ivermectin has been vilified and suppressed. More folks in the US have died from the covid vaccine than all other vaccines combined in the history of vaccine use.

We could have deployed ivermectin globally. No covid. Natural immunity (which is superior). No masks. No vaccines. No vaccine mandates. No threat of vaccine passports. No social distancing. Businesses opened.

But, hey, let's point out that the Afghanis getting ivermectin has nothing to do with covid and was documented for use well before it hit the scene.

Missed free throw.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top