[INFJ] Coronavirus (Covid-19) vaccination and the magnetic phenomenon could be explained by Graphene Oxide

covid-surveillance.jpg
 
For context, Facebook is a major censoring machine and many folks similar to my sense of things have either completely or close to completely bailed out of it. So, its demographic makeup is largely those in the @FiftySeven camp. In consideration of this, a statistical analysis of the replies to this thread is compelling in the extreme as the vast bulk of respondees are talking about something other than what they were questioned for.

Oh, the question was specifically for testimonies of unvaccinated folks who got covid.

Must see. I'll post one extreme example.

https://www.facebook.com/110047718058030/posts/117910867271715/?d=n

comments.jpg comments_example.jpg
 
My motivation in posting the Times Now article was to point out that the UP protocols included widespread vaccinations, mask wearing and social distancing. All of those actions have been ridiculed by @o2b and @larry806q. They insist that the key to the covid reductions was the use of Ivermectin. Its efficacy can not be determined form the UP protocols because it was not used as the sole prophylactic or intervention once a victim was hospitalized.
There are several very difficult papers posted on whether Ivermectin is an effective agent of protection or treatment, most are inconclusive and many conclude it is statistically insignificant.

But none of that matters to those on this thread who insist that the pandemic is either a politically manufactured hoax curated by big pharma and the tech companies. This is the underlying truth of the motivations of those on this thread who continue to insist that the vaccines are evil and mask wearing is mind control.
 
For context, Facebook is a major censoring machine and many folks similar to my sense of things have either completely or close to completely bailed out of it. So, its demographic makeup is largely those in the @FiftySeven camp. In consideration of this, a statistical analysis of the replies to this thread is compelling in the extreme as the vast bulk of respondees are talking about something other than what they were questioned for.

Oh, the question was specifically for testimonies of unvaccinated folks who got covid.

Must see. I'll post one extreme example.

https://www.facebook.com/110047718058030/posts/117910867271715/?d=n

View attachment 83195 View attachment 83196

You mean because Nikki Minaj just got booted for her support of each individual making up their own mind?
 
You mean because Nikki Minaj just got booted for her support of each individual making up their own mind?
Oh no, much greater suppression than that. As one example, there was a Facebook group of vaccine injury testimonies and FB removed the group.

Similarly, I saw the testimony of a father who lost his son after the jab. His son died of heart failure I think 5 days after. Autopsy revealed his heart was 2x normal size. A gofundme page was created for the father and gofundme deleted it because of its subject matter - a father's dead son due to the jab.

edit:
I still had the page of the father. Here is a link to the story.

https://notthebee.com/article/gofun...-father-whose-son-died-after-getting-the-jab-
 
cdc_shit_1.jpg cdc_shit_2.jpg Just an fyi that the CDC now identifies folks who were vaccinated14 days or less before dying as UNVACCINATED. In other news, the CDC changed its definition of the word vaccine. I saw another video of a nurse who said that after the release of the vaccine, almost every patient she saw was vaccine injured. Not a one was entered into VAERS. She said doctors refused to consider any cases vaccine injury.

The following is from @KenoaTheGreat from telegram. (It also included the above diagrams.)

Categorizing patients as "unvaccinated" until 14 days after the 2nd innoculation is a complete and utter fraud on the American people.

Over 80% of adverse events, hospitalizations, and deaths from the COVID-19 vaccines occur within 14 days of getting vaccinated.

These are all recorded by the CDC and hospitals systems as "unvaccinated" patients.

This is a criminal misrepresentation of the data.

The CDC could simply categorize patients as unvaccinated, 1 shot, 2 shot, and fully vaccinated (after 14 days) if they wanted to share a clear and accurate representation of the truth.
 
OK, we're talking the loss of hundreds of thousands of lives. I will resist the complete delusion of anyone who needs to retain an absolutely 100% false narrative. Claiming ivermectin was not the cause of Uttar Pradesh is just too much.

https://indianexpress.com/article/c...ivermectin-helped-to-keep-deaths-low-7311786/

Uttar Pradesh government says early use of Ivermectin helped to keep positivity, deaths low

Claiming that timely introduction of Ivermectin since the first wave has helped the state maintain a relatively low positivity rate despite in its high population density.

A year after the country’s first Covid-19 cluster, with 5 cases, was reported in Agra district, the Uttar Pradesh government has claimed that it was the first state to have introduced a large-scale “prophylactic and therapeutic” use of Ivermectin and added that the drug helped the state to maintain a lower fatality and positivity rate as compared to other states.

Citing the results from Agra in the month of May and June last year, following which the use of Ivermectin, a medicine to treat parasitic ailments, along with Doxycycline was introduced as a protocol across the state for both prophylactic as well as treatment purposes, the state Health Department said it would conduct a controlled study once the second wave of the pandemic subsides.

The state Health Department introduced Ivermectin as prophylaxis for close contacts of Covid patients, health workers as well as for the treatment of the patients themselves through a government order on August 6, 2020, after a committee headed by the Director General, Medical and Health Services, gave it the go ahead.

“Uttar Pradesh was the first state in the country to introduce large-scale prophylactic and therapeutic use of Ivermectin. In May-June 2020, a team at Agra, led by Dr Anshul Pareek, administered Ivermectin to all RRT team members in the district on an experimental basis. It was observed that none of them developed Covid-19 despite being in daily contact with patients who had tested positive for the virus,” Uttar Pradesh State Surveillance Officer Vikssendu Agrawal said.

Read |At least Rs 1 crore compensation for death of polling officers due to Covid-19: Allahabad HC
He added that based on the findings from Agra, the state government sanctioned the use of Ivermectin as a prophylactic for all the contacts of Covid patients and later cleared the administration of therapeutic doses for the treatment of such patients.

Claiming that timely introduction of Ivermectin since the first wave has helped the state maintain a relatively low positivity rate despite its high population density, he said, “Despite being the state with the largest population base and a high population density, we have maintained a relatively low positivity rate and cases per million of population”.
[end of partial excerpt]

This is a state of 270 million people with just over 5% vaccinated. There are essentially no covid casualties, thanks to deployment of ivermectin.

Also:
https://www.theblaze.com/op-ed/horo...-miracle-in-the-indian-state-of-uttar-pradesh

Uttar Pradesh might sound obscure to most Americans, but it is the most populated state in India, with urban areas that rival the most densely populated cities in the U.S. Yet, miraculously, despite housing a population of 240 million people, this northern state has been averaging only 24 cases and 0-2 deaths per day in recent months. Despite its size — roughly 73% of the U.S. population — it ranked dead last in cases per capita last week among India's 36 states. What gives?
The answer likely lies in the 10-letter "I-word" that you are not allowed to mention on social media: ivermectin. Evidently, the global medical junta doesn't like the over 60 studies vouching for the efficacy of ivermectin against SARS-CoV-2, especially when used early, but there is something better than a study: pure reality of lived experience.

Last year, the northern state of Uttar Pradesh began dispensing ivermectin liberally and encouraging people to take it early on and even preventively. As Trial Site News reported earlier this year, "By the end of 2020, Uttar Pradesh — which distributed free ivermectin for home care — had the second-lowest fatality rate in India at 0.26 per 100,000 residents in December. Only the state of Bihar, with 128 million residents, was lower, and it, too, recommends ivermectin."
 
Is this punishment for not taking the vaccine or supply chain management?
When Joe Biden’s Health and Human Services made the announcement earlier this month (LINK) that they were taking full control over Monoclonal Antibody drugs (mAb) in order to begin rationing the highly effective treatment for COVID-19 infection, several people sounded alarm bells as there was the potential for rationing of COVID treatment based on political ideology. Representative Chip Roy of Texas was one of the first to raise concerns (link).
The change in HHS approach followed republican governor Ron DeSantis of Florida promoting the use of mAb and opening up dozens of treatment centers throughout his state. Other governors quickly took notice of the effective action plan of DeSantis in Florida and started to follow that path.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/09/15/covid-politics-takes-a-dark-turn-biden-administration-takes-control-of-monoclonal-antibody-drugs-in-order-to-block-treatments-in-red-states-and-ration-equitable-treatment/[/URL]
INDIANAPOLIS, Sept. 15, 2021 /PRNewswire/ -- Eli Lilly and Company (NYSE: LLY) today announced an additional purchase by the U.S. government for its neutralizing antibody therapies authorized for emergency use as a treatment for COVID-19. As part of the agreement, Lilly will supply 388,000 doses of etesevimab to complement doses of bamlanivimab previously purchased by the U.S. government, with approximately 200,000 doses expected to ship Q3 2021 and the remaining to be shipped in Q4. This transaction is expected to generate approximately $330 million in revenue in the second half of 2021.

"The recent increase in COVID-19 cases has caused a substantial rise in the utilization of monoclonal antibody drugs, particularly in areas of the country with low vaccination rates," said Daniel Skovronsky, M.D., Ph.D., Lilly's chief scientific and medical officer, and president of Lilly Research Laboratories...

On September 2nd, the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR), alongside the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), resumed the shipment and distribution of bamlanivimab and etesevimab administered together.

The purchase was funded by the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response through Department of Defense contract number W911QY21D0012.
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-rel...ent-for-treatment-of-covid-19--301377090.html
The US Gov has to manage the supply of Monoclonal Anitibody drugs which it orders and purchases. The CDC is an agency created by congress to study diseases and make recommendations to the executive branch as to how to deal with diseases on a national level. People are free to buy whatever is available on the private markets to deal with their personal health issues but if you are going to rely on the federal government for healthcare then you have to submit to the system which it creates. There is only so much supply available, those areas of the country which are declining the MRNA vaccines and are thereby experiencing increased covid cases are not entitled to more Monoclonal Anitibody drugs then other parts of the country just because they are opposed to the "Jab". Both are being provided by the taxpayers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: o2b
Ivermectin studies related to covid:

https://c19ivermectin.com/
Database of all ivermectin COVID-19 studies. 116 studies, 76 peer reviewed, 63 with results comparing treatment and control groups. FLCCC provides treatment recommendations. Submit updates/corrections.
Ivmmeta.com, c19ivermectin.com, c19hcq.com, hcqmeta.com, etc: These sites are not reliable. The authors are pseudonymous. The findings have not been subject to peer review. We must rely on expert opinion, which describes these sites as unreliable. From published criticisms (1 2 3 4), it is clear that these analyses violate basic methodological norms which are known to cause spurious or false conclusions. These analyses include studies which have very small sample sizes, widely different dosages of treatment, open-label designs, different incompatible outcome measures, poor-quality control groups, and ad-hoc un-published trials which themselves did not undergo peer-review. (Dec 2020, Jan 2021, Feb 2021)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ivermectin
 
So wikipedia speaks with more authority than Uttar Pradesh and the scientific literature.

Yupper.
 
Back
Top