↑From Post #60 (this thread)
Sorn,
I am curious what things you think it possibly explains.
Anyway, I have an anxiety disorder that qualifies for meds. I'll take cannabis over prescription meds any day.
- - - - - - -
I think you can read for yourself about the effects and side effects of cannabis.
I am not your therapist. Maybe your therapist had a reason not to point this out to you.
##########
##########
From Post #67 (this thread)
As for its relation to you, I do not see how they are criticisng your mental wellbeing. You appeared to take their post as insulting and failed to see the argument of which they were putting forth. If they are putting forth the argument that your perspective is invalidated by their perception of your state of mind, then perhaps
@Sorn can be explicit about such. I do not see the point in inferring into whether their actions were personally motivated against you - just the content of their argument.
*****************
First my apologies on my limited technical skills. For reference the first quote is from Post #60 and the second quote is from post #67.
OK so clearly being on the right makes me dumber than a box of rocks so I don't follow this at all. 1. O2b posts to Sorn about why he needs Cannibis. 2. Sorn uses that post (O2b's) as a quote to reply to O2b that he (Sorn) is not O2b's therapist and then makes the huge leap to: his therapist (O2b's) (which he doesn't have) isn't pointing things out to him (O2b).
So the logic now is that someone pointing out you have a therapist (with no knowledge of said fact(s)) is not inferring a mental issue? And that using YOUR quote in THEIR post was not personally motivated against the person whose quote they are using. Further then the content of the argument is then also invalid since O2b doesn't have a therapist and never stated or suggested such.
I also can't quite get my low I.Q. brain around how someone's perception via internet posts of someone else's state of mind allows the assuming person to invalidate anything.
I will concede that using that form of "logic" would indeed make it easier to suggest that reading Biden's words could allow someone to perceive Biden to be lucid (all facts to the contrary).