D
Deleted member 16771
Depends.level 3 bullshit?
let's negotiate
What level of bullshit do you normally consider 'the Humanities' as a whole?
Depends.level 3 bullshit?
let's negotiate
Depends.
What level of bullshit do you normally consider 'the Humanities' as a whole?
level 3 bullshit?
let's negotiate
Are you saying that this thread makes you uncomfortable, Wy?I find it personally bullshit, because of how I operate, it necessitates some sense of sovereignty of thought.
But as a practical matter within society, it's not. He's just sort of shining a light on this way of operating as he tends to do, and trying to exploit it for his own agenda of communal strength.
Hos is pushing an envelope of comfort with this thread, that stifles operating Ni effectively imo.
Or it's just my own discomfort due to a lifetime of ostricization on some level as a Ni user.
Maybe if the world valued Ni on some level, it could be put to better use.
That's probably Hos' point ultimately, and since this place does tend toward valuing Ni, it's a more safe place to suggest the idea.
But this ignores the reality of the world.
Got my own ostricizations. Though not to detract from your point.lifetime of ostricization on some level as a Ni user.
It's probably more of how he personally feels than your intention to be a dick.Are you saying that this thread makes you uncomfortable, Wy?
I wasn't quite sure where the hostility (towards the thread) was coming from. I don't think I'm being a dick or anything in bringing it to light.
Are you saying that this thread makes you uncomfortable, Wy?
I appreciate Ni, but I do have problems with bad decisions made upon it.
I'm very confused. What's the outcome?I'm saying, within this community, it causes me discomfort not necessarily for my own sake, but for the sake of other members who are Ni users.
There is some level of discomfort there for me, but it is minimal compared to my concerns for other members and the community as a whole.
You suggested the idea; I saw the outcome a hundred years later.
I appreciate Ni, but I do have problems with bad decisions made upon it.
hostility
Lol.I am most definitely NOT going to post in real time in this thread. "Oh, they're going to break up," will not go over well.
'Bulldozing with my own narrative'?I don't appreciate that you injected this word into the narrative. It invalidates my own feelings here, and I'm just trying to look out for people. Just because I call bullshit doesn't mean I'm being hostile, and even if I kind of am, it's only a reaction to what is a hostile move on your part. You don't think you're being hostile, but you're also just bulldozing with your own narrative. Pushback is not hostility.
It's not bullshit, but I see what you're saying.
I wanted to try to see if it were possible to share these intuitions 'communally'; to make them more conscious.
My field, and what I'm interested in, is social epistemology - specifically the mechanisms by which novel ideas are generated.
What we seem to be aware of on this forum is something like the collective unconscious - the way people respond to each other subconsciously and subtly shift their emotional states, which cascades throughout our social networks. Given enough scale and time, it seems that social groups 'create' novel ideas from within the collective unconscious without the need for any single individual to have had or articulated the idea.
This would be a very different mechanic of idea generation than the point-to-point, brain-to-brain conscious tracing that dominates intellectual history and social epistemology, and exploring that in the microcosm of the forum is intrinsically interesting to me, not least because so many of us report it so often.
It's a perception function (Ni/Ne/Si/Se), not a decision making function (Ti/Te/Fi/Fe)You're pinpointing an issue on the forum about inconsistencies describing what Ni is and how it works.
I don't think you're being reasonable with me at all.
Wy I'm not very attracted to it
What we seem to be aware of on this forum is something like the collective unconscious - the way people respond to each other subconsciously and subtly shift their emotional states, which cascades throughout our social networks. Given enough scale and time, it seems that social groups 'create' novel ideas from within the collective unconscious without the need for any single individual to have had or articulated the idea.