I think it's important to note that there are, at least in some countries, benifits to getting married that have nothing to do with religion.
Very true, my other uncle got married in Japan with his wife because her VISA was about to expire, but they do not know even know exactly when they got married to this very day. The question then arises what the merit of marriage itself is if it does not transcend these material benefits for some individuals?
I just ask, because it seems from this thread, that those who come from divorced parents have almost all made a point of saying how they don't think marriage is all that important - and that divorce was a good thing. Presumably, parents whose own parents divorced may have similar views.
All 4 of my grandparents were still together at the time. On the contrary, it was because my mother placed so much value on being together for the sake of "lifelong commitment" that the divorce became such a horrendous experience for some. The acknowledgement of this act may have triggered a backfire response in how other around her see marriage. They could have seen it as a mistake to uphold such a mentality. Not surprising after experiencing the effects first hand. (but yea, those crazy Si types drawing conclusions from experience. To be honest, such a mentality could have also spelled out a different scenario)
Understanding that we have choices forces us to really find out what makes us happy, unhappy, fearful, etc...essentially self exploration which was not really afforded to people freely in lets say 3 to 4 generations ago resulting in high divorce cases. With this new found freedom people are still lost as to how to find satisfying love.
True, in the past family structures were dominated by forced/planned marriages and lifelong commitment was almost always the norm. What's interesting to note is that these people probably coped and accepted society at the time. Would a stricter society result in an overall increase in happiness and stability? Also, since when was it the trend to defy the norms of society? Which generation started the trend where they felt entitlement to choice of their partners now and the rest of their lives? Why did they feel that? Was it an emotion all generations felt? If so, why was it possible for that one generation to actually execute change?
But that's all history.... Let's think about the present.
One thing seems to be very very apparent after discussing all these interesting points. The contemporary society, in regards to family structure, is not near perfect. This dissatisfaction will likely lead to change in how the next generations will handle their lives.
But isn't this paradoxical? One can conclude that high divorce rates were a result from new-found freedom. How will the newer generations go about changing if the source of the problem seems to be the fact that they have the ability to choose?
Is this really the source of the problem? Or perhaps is choice/freedom merely a factor that enabled the occurrence of a
different problem...? (Ooooooooh
spicy~~)
Do you think that humans are responsible enough to choose what will bring them happiness? Or will they, in their folly, inevitably make wrong decisions that they will regret (generally speaking?)
(Don't mind me, I'm just opening new avenues of thought, most of what I write cannot be verified for 100% truth)
Though, one of the marriages ended because of suicide. So I assume (I did not know my grandfather) that the marriages were not... the best.
Oooh, one of my grandparents also committed suicide. My Japanese grandmother actually, when she was 79 I think..... But it's a secret only me, my grandfather and my grandmother's sister knew. But my grandmother's sister had to "tell" me because she felt she felt the urge to share the truth. (complicated story, but it's very interesting)