- MBTI
- INFJ
- Enneagram
- 1w2 sx/so/sp
My point exactly! And yet it makes no sense.
Naaah, quantum theory does make sense when you get into it. It's just very counter intuitive and "strange". It's also very very hard to grasp.
My point exactly! And yet it makes no sense.
It seems to conflict with what I know about reality though, and that's the same issue I have with most matters of spirituality. To some, however, spiritual phenomena like guardian angels make perfect sense.
It's kind of interesting. My father (ESTJ) disagrees with my spiritual views outright, and has told me since I was little that "once you learn more about science you will throw out all of those nonsense beliefs you hold". Learning quantum theory and some parts of inorganic chemistry has actually solidified the views I hold; it fit's together in my head. It's extremely hard for me to put to words though (partly because I would have to review quantum for an hour or two to explain it and I am nooooooot going to do that ).
No, but I suspect INFJ's worldwide do. Logical ones like Indy are rare it seems, judging by this forum.
You're rather unobservant if you believe of the INFJ's here are "spiritual" yet Indy is not. You realise it's the other way around.
There seems to be about a 50/50 split. Type doesn't seem to be a factor regarding spiritualism on this site
Unobservant? Moi?
I must admit I tend to ignore most humans, they bore me quite frankly, but in the broad sense of the word? Nonsense, I notice acute changes of no importance whatsoever.
Alright then, but I bet there's a correlation between IQ and spiritualism.
Hrm, Mensa studies confirmed a heavy lean towards atheism if I recall.
(Where did I put the link?)
Yet Anglicans have been shown to be smarter than Atheists in terms of IQ. Furthermore, as I recall, the international study was handed its arse in criticism. But that's neither here nor there.
Now about Guardian angels, I am not sure they exist, but at the same time, I think there are reasons to believe they may exist. For example, my cousin, while walking out on the ice of my grandma's lake (we usually go up there on vacation and it freezes over in the winter of course) fell through and almost drowned. According to his story, he put his face up to the ice and could not find the hole he fell through. Then someone reached down and pulled him up through the ice... that is the solid ice, without making a hole in it not quite 50 feet away from the hole he fell through. He said they looked like snowmobilers at first, but when he turned to look at them again, they were gone, no tracks, no nothing, he was there, wet, 50 ft away from the hole he fell through. Now there are several conclusions one could make, either I am lying, my cousin was lying, or I am as best as I can relaying to you, what he told me when I had this same discussion with him, and found out what reason he had to believe in Guardian angels. The dilemma is that while we might say he hallucinated everything but the hole, and his falling through, in saying so his survival then becomes difficult to account for.
I do agree with you that his argument was somewhat flimsy, (incidentally, I thought we were talking about guardian angels, not works of God) but I would say a flimsy argument is better than none at all. I cannot agree though that every explanation I stated is infinitely more plausible than guardian angels. In fact, if we accept that my cousin was telling the truth, (about his experiences, even if we don't assume he's necessarily accurate, or confused) none of the explanations natural or supernatural seem plausible at all.Plus every explanation you stated other than guardian angels is infinately more plausible. Either he was lying or just confused after his near death experience.
It always makes me laugh how religious types are so quick to attribute things to the work of god based on the flimsiest of evidence
How can you blame them though? I mean even presuming the criticisms weren't legitimate, lets say that someone wrote something saying that people (generally) who believe as you do about whatever (pick something that you're passionate about) are x,y,or z (assuming those are very bad) you never get defensive, or annoyed, or even feel slighted in the least degree?Yes well religious folk always kick up a massive fuss when anything makes them look less than perfect. What exactly do you mean by had their arse handed to them?
Yes that's interesting, lets say those vanishing 'snowmobilers' were supernatural beings, that doesn't necessitate they were guardian angels, perhaps they could be ghosts, or something else even... (assuming one believes in those things as well) good thought. parallel dimensions... well consiousness is a strange phenomenon, but that's a little much, even for me.I find supernatural anecdotes to be somewhat confusing, though even within the realm of the supernatural, there are many explanations we can give other than that there are angels watching over us. I wonder if the more 'spiritual' people have actually tapped into some kind of power which allows them to pop into another parallel dimension temporarily, allowing for things such as the above.
But, it still seems much more likely that we hallucinate or get an overactive imagination about things, esp. in times of crisis.