How can we take it back?

Thursday, September 29, 2016
Common Dreams
Over 20 Arrested After Militarized Police Raid #NoDAPL Prayer Ceremony
Water protectors say that "with state police protecting Dakota Access Pipeline," President Obama's "words are meaningless."
Lauren McCauley, staff writer

no_dapl_rob_wilson.jpg


According to photographer Rob Wilson, who documented Wednesday's raid, "roughly 150 peaceful Water Protectors gathered for prayer near construction sites of the Dakota Access Pipeline...and were met with a heavy show of force by authorities." (Photo: Rob Wilson Photography)

Twenty-one water protectors were arrested in North Dakota on Wednesday after a military-style raid interrupted a peaceful prayer ceremony at a Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) construction site.

Hundreds of demonstrators have been taking part in the prayer ceremony in recent days, according to the Red Warrior Camp, traveling to sacred sites that are being threatened by the pipeline construction, beginning Tuesday with the ancestral site where private security guards unleashed attack dogs on unarmed protesters earlier this month.

[...]

http://commondreams.org/news/2016/0...ilitarized-police-raid-nodapl-prayer-ceremony


The protesters are just praying and dancing and singing. The riot police has lots of bulky equipment and zero success in deterring the protesters. This is neither efficient nor effective. The expenditure of the police should be adjusted accordingly.
 
Thursday, September 22, 2016
Common Dreams
Tribes Across North America Unite in 'Wall of Opposition' to Alberta Tar Sands
More than 50 tribes signed on to the historic treaty alliance, banding together for the sake of their health and planet
Lauren McCauley, staff writer

treaty_alliance_against_tar_sands_.jpg

Tsleil-Waututh leaders sign the Treat Alliance Against the Tar Sands in Vancouver, B.C. on September 22, 2016. (Photo by Elizabeth McSheffrey/ National Observer)

In a historic show of unity, more than 50 First Nations across North America on Thursday signed a new treaty alliance against the expansion of tar sands mining and infrastructure in their territory.

Citing the threats to water and land through a spill or pipeline leak, as well the industry's undeniable impact on "catastrophic climate change," the treaty (pdf) states, "Tar Sands expansion is a collective threat to our Nations. It requires a collective response."

"Therefore," it continues, "our Nations hereby join together under the present treaty to officially prohibit and to agree to collectively challenge and resist the use of our respective territories and coasts in connection with the expansion of the production of the Alberta Tar Sands, including for the transport of such expanded production, whether by pipeline, rail or tanker."

[...]

As Carrier Sekani Tribal Chief Terry Teegee observed, "a pipeline cannot hope to pass through a unified wall of Indigenous opposition," nor can it find an alternate route around it.

[...]

http://commondreams.org/news/2016/0...erica-unite-wall-opposition-alberta-tar-sands


Visionaries. We need more of those.
 
Friday, September 30, 2016
Common Dreams
Citing Environmental Risks, Scientists Back Tribes in Dakota Access Fight
Meanwhile, a Reuters investigation finds pipeline spill detection system severely flawed
Deirdre Fulton, staff writer

stand-with-standing-rock_oakland.jpg

A #NoDAPL solidarity event in Oakland, California earlier this month. (Photo: Peg Hunter/flickr/cc)

Close to 100 scientists have signed onto a letter decrying "inadequate environmental and cultural impact assessments" for the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL), and calling for a halt to construction until such tests have been carried out as requested by the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe.

Lead signatories Stephanie Januchowski-Hartley, Anne Hilborn, Katherine Crocker, and Asia Murphy drew attention to the missive in a letter to the journal Science published Friday.

"The DAPL project is just one of many haphazard approaches to natural resource extraction that overlook broader consequences of oil development," they wrote.

Furthermore, the open letter (pdf) states, "We as scientists are concerned about the potential local and regional impacts from the DAPL, which is symptomatic of the United States' continued dependence on fossil fuels in the face of predicted broad-scale social and ecological impacts from global climate change." Specifically, they cite the Standing Rock Sioux's concerns that the pipeline project threatens biodiversity and clean water.

Underscoring those concerns, a Reuters investigation into the nation's pipeline system published Friday reveals that "sensitive technology designed to pick up possible spills is about as successful as a random member of the public...finding it, despite efforts from pipeline operators."


In fact, according to the Reuters analysis of U.S. Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) data, "[o]ver the last six years, there have been 466 incidents where a pipeline carrying crude oil or refined products has leaked. Of those, 105, or 22 percent, were detected by an advanced detection system."


Even more troubling, the data "shows the leak detection systems have caught small leaks and missed some of the largest," Reuters reports, with six out of the largest 10 pipeline spills in the U.S. since 2010 going undetected by these systems.


Beyond its potential for local devastation, DAPL will make it nigh impossible for the U.S. to meet its commitments under the Paris Agreement to limit global warming, the scientists said in their letter.

As Bill McKibben said Friday on Democracy Now! of the Standing Rock Sioux and their allies: "They're holding the line against something that threatens not only their reservation, but threatens the whole planet. We do not—we cannot pump more oil. We've got to stop opening up new reserves."

http://commondreams.org/news/2016/0...ks-scientists-back-tribes-dakota-access-fight


Hhhmmm, the efficiency of the private sector??? Perhaps that we could ask Milton Friedman on the other side about that?
 
Friday, September 23, 2016
Common Dreams
Larry Sanders, Bernie's Brother, to Fight for David Cameron's MP Seat
"We need to show that we don't want Britain to be the most unequal country in Europe"
Nadia Prupis, staff writer

larry_sanders.jpg

The elder Sanders opposes privatization of healthcare and, as a retired social worker, wants to highlight the impacts of austerity on public services. (Photo: AP)

Larry Sanders, the older brother of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who lives in the U.K., is taking a page from his brother's book and running for the parliamentary seat left empty by former Prime Minister David Cameron.

And in keeping with family tradition, he will campaign on a platform to end social inequality and neoliberalism. The elder Sanders, who was chosen by the Green Party, opposes privatization of healthcare and, as a retired social worker, wants to highlight the impacts of austerity on public services.

"In Britain, as in the U.S., we have had an increase in inequality in the last 30 years, and that's having all sorts of consequences," he told the Guardian on Friday—comments that probably seemed familiar to some American readers. "Many people can't afford houses who you would have expected to not long ago."

"We need to show that we don't want Britain to be the most unequal country in Europe. We don't want unmet health needs to increase when we already have too few doctors, nurses, and hospital beds," he said in a separate statement. "We don't want the government to impose unworkable contracts on 50,000 precious doctors, when it is clear that the supposed reason for the contract, a seven day hospital service, can't be done at present funding."

"This is a rich, capable, and decent country," he said. "We can do better."

Cameron resigned as prime minister following the Brexit referendum but only stepped down as a minister of parliament this month, triggering a by-election for his seat in Witney of Oxfordshire.

Left-leaning candidates do not do well in the area, the Guardian notes, with the last Green to run there winning just 5.1 percent of the vote, but Sanders believes his name recognition will go a long way.

"Because of Bernard, I've become famous, and I will get more attention from the media, and that's to be used to get the Green Party's policies across," he said. "Bernard's campaign in America was a very successful shifting point."

"Our similarities in terms of policies are astonishing, partly because we talk all the time," he added.

Sanders will face off with Conservative candidate Robert Courts, Liberal Democrat Liz Leffman, and Labour's Duncan Enright. The election will take place on Thursday, October 20.

Sanders moved to Britain in the 1960s after studying at Harvard Law School.

http://commondreams.org/news/2016/09/23/larry-sanders-bernies-brother-fight-david-camerons-mp-seat
http://commondreams.org/news/2016/09/23/larry-sanders-bernies-brother-fight-david-camerons-mp-seat

Good luck, Bernie 'bro'.
 
Published on
Thursday, September 29, 2016
by
Common Dreams
Undermining Democracy, Corporations Pouring Millions into Local Ballot Fights
Public Citizen finds total corporate spending on just eight local measures has topped $139 million

by
Lauren McCauley, staff writer


3 Comments
billions_vs_billions.jpg

According to Public Citizen, the corporate-backed campaigns have an average of 10-to-1 financial advantage over their mostly grassroots opponents(Photo: Jason Hargrove/cc/flickr)

This election cycle, corporate donors are not just beefing up the war chests of their most-favored politicians. According to a new study, industry is flexing its Supreme Court- approved political power to dominate local democracy, as well.

In the study, Big Business Ballot Bullies (pdf), Public Citizen examined eight state-level ballot initiatives and referenda that have seen an outsized amount of political spending. According to the research, published Wednesday, the corporate-backed campaigns have an average of 10-to-1 financial advantage over their mostly grassroots opponents, with total corporate spending in those races topping $139 million.

[...]

Claypool points out that it was the Supreme Court's 1978 decision, First National Bank of Boston v Bellotti—not Citizens United—that permitted unlimited corporate spending on ballot initiatives.

"But the solution to Citizens United and Bellotti is the same," he wrote, "a constitutional amendment, such as the Democracy For All Amendment that was supported by a majority of U.S. senators in 2014, can overturn both rulings by asserting the state’s authority to limit corporate election spending."

http://commondreams.org/news/2016/0...orations-pouring-millions-local-ballot-fights
http://commondreams.org/news/2016/0...orations-pouring-millions-local-ballot-fights

Yeah, it would be nice to see ban against all types of unlimited corporate funding. There is that expression in English "kill two birds with one stone" that neatly describes overturning the two previous SCOTUS decisions. A similar expression exists in Swedish: "kill two flies in one strike [using a flyswatter]." I would like to think of psychopathic companies as flies rather than birds.
 
Monday, October 03, 2016
Common Dreams
32 Arrested After 200 Iowa #NoDAPL Protesters Dismantle Security Fence in Bid to Disrupt Pipeline Drilling
An indigenous delegation from the Sacred Stone Camp at Standing Rock joined family farmers, students, and everyday Iowans on the banks of the Mississippi River Saturday
David Goodner

iowa_dakota_pipeline.jpg

(Photo: Jim Arenz, Mississippi Stand)

MONTROSE, Iowa — On Saturday, October 1, more than two hundred water protectors marched from the banks of the Mississippi River through a timbered woodland lot to a Dakota Access river boring site and tore down a security fence before being repelled by the Iowa State Patrol and the Lee County Sheriff's Department.

Thirty-two people were arrested and charged with trespassing, officials confirmed.

[...]

http://commondreams.org/news/2016/1...otesters-dismantle-security-fence-bid-disrupt


Protesters are coming from other states. This would not be possible without the Internet. How humiliating.:m074:
 
Monday, October 03, 2016
Common Dreams
Ex-CIA Detainees Describe 'Terrifying' Unreported Torture Techniques
New reports from Human Rights Watch shed further light on program the government fought for years to keep hidden from public
Nadia Prupis, staff writer

cia_chair.jpg

One of the methods involved being threatened with a makeshift electric chair. (Photo: Human Rights Watch)

In a new Human Rights Watch (HRW) report released Monday, two former CIA detainees described previously unreported torture techniques used in secret U.S. prisons overseas, shedding new light on the program the government fought for years to keep hidden.

Ridha al-Najjar, 51, and Lotfi al-Arabi El Gherissi, 52, both Tunisian men recently repatriated after being in CIA custody for 13 years without charge, independently described being threatened with a makeshift electric chair, deprived of sleep, subject to multiple forms of water torture, chained by their wrists to the ceilings of their cells for extended periods of time, and severely beaten.

The executive summary of the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee's still-classified torture report makes no mention of electric chairs.

HRW writes of El Gherissi's experience:

He said the chair was made of metal, or perhaps iron. It had clips with wires attached to it intended to be fit on fingers, and a helmet with wires. His description suggested something makeshift, attached to a pipe that came out of a wall. His interrogators put him in the chair and threatened to use it on him unless he gave them more information, though they did not. He said this terrified him and he was trembling. The room also had a board that they threatened to put him on, but never did. He said he understood that water would be used on him while he was on the board.

Al-Najjar separately recounted similar treatment:

It was made out of metal or iron, had plugs attached to wires for fitting on fingers, and a headset with wires. The description suggested make-shift apparatus, attached to a wall pipe. His U.S. interrogators threatened during interrogations to use the chair on him, but never actually did. The room also contained other instruments used for torture, including a board that he believes his interrogators used on him on various occasions for different types of water torture, and a coffin in which they threatened to place him.

"These terrifying accounts of previously unreported CIA torture methods show how little the public still knows about the U.S. torture program," said HRW senior U.S. national security counsel Laura Pitter.

The most abuse took place at a facility known as Cobalt, a site in Afghanistan, which al-Najjar and El Gherissi called the "Dark Prison." Other detainees have referred to it alternately as the Dark Prison or the "Salt Pit" as well. Al-Najjar recounted his interrogators at Cobalt "threatening the 'well-being of his family,' using 'sound disorientation techniques,' denying him sleep using round-the-clock interrogations, depriving him of any 'sense of time,' keeping him in 'isolation in total darkness; lowering the quality of his food,' using cold temperatures, playing music '24 hours a day, and keeping him shackled and hooded.'"

A CIA cable issued September 21, 2002 described him as a "clearly broken man" who was "on the verge of a complete breakdown." He remained in CIA custody for another 13 years.

Both men were set free in 2015 with no compensation or support from the U.S. or Tunisian governments, which violated international human rights law, HRW said—particularly the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Convention Against Torture, both of which the U.S. has ratified. Under those laws, "governments have obligations to ensure the right to an effective remedy for victims of serious human rights violations, including torture and other ill-treatment," the human rights group wrote. "Although these violations did not take place in the United States, they occurred while the individuals were under the effective control of U.S. security forces."

Today, al-Najjar and El Gherissi live with their families in Tunisia in destitute conditions, struggling with severe trauma. Al-Najjar, who said his hips, ankle, and back were broken in detention, told HRW that he is still suffering from damage to several internal organs, as well as his ear. "My sister has five kids," he told Pitter. "I am the sixth."

El Gherissi lives with his family in a house that has no doors or full roof. He shares a bed with his elderly mother and cannot afford to see a doctor.

Pitter continued, "The release of these two men without the U.S. providing any assistance or redress for their torture and suffering also shows how much the U.S. still needs to do to put the CIA torture program behind it."

http://commondreams.org/news/2016/1...ribe-terrifying-unreported-torture-techniques


The truth is catching up at last. Prisoners are people. Corporations are not.
 
Tuesday, October 04, 2016
Common Dreams
Fracking Industry's New Plan? Prosecute Those Who Push Drilling Bans
As communities seek to protect themselves from toxic drilling, Pennsylvania industry group mulls statute to deter such ordinances
Lauren McCauley, staff writer

pennsylvania_fracking.jpg

Pennsylvanians demonstrate against fracking in their community. (Photo: Elias Schewel/cc/flickr)

"Drained" from taking local municipalities to court over fracking bans, a fossil fuel industry group is now considering charging local officials who suggest such prohibitions with criminal prosecution, new reporting by the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette revealed Tuesday.

In the face of federal governmental inaction, more and more local municipalities have passed bans on fracking to address the mounting public health and environmental problems caused by the toxic drilling process. In fact, according to the Post-Gazette, since Pittsburgh passed its ordinance in 2010, more than 100 other localities have followed suit.

In Pennsylvania, which is the second largest producer of fracked gas in the nation, as well as elsewhere, the drilling industry has aggressively challenged these bans—but, according to Kevin Moody, general counsel for the Pennsylvania Independent Oil & Gas Association, that "fight is draining and doesn't seem to be deterring municipal officials from attempting to block oil and gas development."

Alternately, Moody told the Post-Gazette that he's been "exploring" the concept of criminal prosecution for years but finally found a fitting statute to test it out.

"It's called official oppression," the newspaper explained, "and makes it a second degree misdemeanor for a public official to deny or impede someone's rights or privileges with the knowledge such actions are illegal. The penalty is up to two years in prison and a fine of up to $5,000."


Moody specifically cited the recent action taken by Grant Township as an "egregious example" that should be challenged. In the face of ongoing litigation over its fracking ban, the Pennsylvania community last spring adopted the country's first municipal charter establishing a local bill of rights codifying environmental and democratic rights.


At the time of its adoption, noted climate activist Tim DeChristopher, called it "one of the boldest moves to stop the natural gas industry's attacks on our communities, climate, and democracy."

But Moody claims that the charter, which was drafted by the Franklin County-based nonprofit Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund (CELDF), is illegal. If a judge agrees with him, Moody could use that decision "to say municipal officials know what they're doing is not legal when they deny gas companies the right to operate within their borders. From there, other options could surface," such as filing a private criminal complaint against or impeaching local officials, the Post-Gazette reported.

Chad Nicholson, Pennsylvania organizer for CELDF, said the threat of criminal prosecution once again illustrates "the sense of privilege and entitlement" that the fossil fuel industry holds over the communities they try to "bully into submission."

http://commondreams.org/news/2016/1...w-plan-prosecute-those-who-push-drilling-bans


This is potentially good news. When facing local resistance, the oil companies are under pressure and feeling the heat. :m106:
 
Tuesday, October 04, 2016
Common Dreams
Fracking Industry's New Plan? Prosecute Those Who Push Drilling Bans
As communities seek to protect themselves from toxic drilling, Pennsylvania industry group mulls statute to deter such ordinances
Lauren McCauley, staff writer

pennsylvania_fracking.jpg

Pennsylvanians demonstrate against fracking in their community. (Photo: Elias Schewel/cc/flickr)

"Drained" from taking local municipalities to court over fracking bans, a fossil fuel industry group is now considering charging local officials who suggest such prohibitions with criminal prosecution, new reporting by the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette revealed Tuesday.

In the face of federal governmental inaction, more and more local municipalities have passed bans on fracking to address the mounting public health and environmental problems caused by the toxic drilling process. In fact, according to the Post-Gazette, since Pittsburgh passed its ordinance in 2010, more than 100 other localities have followed suit.

In Pennsylvania, which is the second largest producer of fracked gas in the nation, as well as elsewhere, the drilling industry has aggressively challenged these bans—but, according to Kevin Moody, general counsel for the Pennsylvania Independent Oil & Gas Association, that "fight is draining and doesn't seem to be deterring municipal officials from attempting to block oil and gas development."

Alternately, Moody told the Post-Gazette that he's been "exploring" the concept of criminal prosecution for years but finally found a fitting statute to test it out.

"It's called official oppression," the newspaper explained, "and makes it a second degree misdemeanor for a public official to deny or impede someone's rights or privileges with the knowledge such actions are illegal. The penalty is up to two years in prison and a fine of up to $5,000."


Moody specifically cited the recent action taken by Grant Township as an "egregious example" that should be challenged. In the face of ongoing litigation over its fracking ban, the Pennsylvania community last spring adopted the country's first municipal charter establishing a local bill of rights codifying environmental and democratic rights.


At the time of its adoption, noted climate activist Tim DeChristopher, called it "one of the boldest moves to stop the natural gas industry's attacks on our communities, climate, and democracy."

But Moody claims that the charter, which was drafted by the Franklin County-based nonprofit Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund (CELDF), is illegal. If a judge agrees with him, Moody could use that decision "to say municipal officials know what they're doing is not legal when they deny gas companies the right to operate within their borders. From there, other options could surface," such as filing a private criminal complaint against or impeaching local officials, the Post-Gazette reported.

Chad Nicholson, Pennsylvania organizer for CELDF, said the threat of criminal prosecution once again illustrates "the sense of privilege and entitlement" that the fossil fuel industry holds over the communities they try to "bully into submission."

http://commondreams.org/news/2016/1...w-plan-prosecute-those-who-push-drilling-bans


This is potentially good news. When facing local resistance, the oil companies are under pressure and feeling the heat. :m106:


Not only does it poison the water...but it has a shit-ton of waste water and is causing severe seismic activity in towns and cities that had little to none beforehand.

I HOPE these are the last dying gasps as the oil/gas industry tries to grasp the few remaining straws before as they fall.
 
Japan: one fifth of employees at risk of death from overwork – report
More than 20% of workers clocked dangerous levels of overtime each month, according to a government survey



While the popular image of Japanese salarymen toiling long hours is changing, many still work longer than their foreign counterparts. Photograph: Alamy

Saturday 8 October 2016 06.35 BST

A fifth of the Japanese workforce faces the risk of death from overwork, according to a new government survey into the country’s notoriously strenuous working culture.

Hundreds of deaths related to overwork – from strokes, heart attacks and suicide – are reported every year in Japan, along with a host of serious health problems, sparking lawsuits and calls to tackle the problem.

The survey was part of the nation’s first white paper on “karoshi”, or death from overwork, endorsed by Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s cabinet on Friday.

While the popular image of Japanese salarymen toiling long hours for the company before taking the last train home is changing, many still spend far more hours in the office than counterparts in other modern economies.

According to the paper, 22.7% of companies polled between December 2015 and January 2016 said some of their employees logged more than 80 hours of overtime each month – the official threshold at which the prospect of death from work becomes serious.

The report added that approximately 21.3% of Japanese employees work 49 or more hours each week on average, well above the 16.4% reported in the US, 12.5 % in Britain and 10.4% in France.

The survey concluded that Japanese employees also reported feeling high levels of stress related to their work, pushing officials to call on companies to improve working conditions.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...ployees-at-risk-of-death-from-overwork-report


In the face of the Japanese productivity wonder in the 1980's, the media was giving the picture that Western countries would have to start behaving like the Japanese or face economic extinction. In did not turn out like that. And now Japan is in economic turmoil, so they should develop a different model in order to get their economy in order. Despite this, the USA did turn Japanese in terms of work hours. It has been creeping up since the 1970's or 1980's.
 
Thursday, October 06, 2016
Common Dreams
UK Dismantles Democracy to Double Down on Fracked Gas
Environmentalists and community members are accusing the U.K. government of climate "hypocrisy" in light of the newly-ratified Paris agreement
Lauren McCauley, staff writer

shale_epic_fail_.jpg

A recent protest by the group Frack Free Lancashire. (Photo: @FrackFreeLancs/Twitter)

Ignoring massive local opposition, as well as grave threats to community and climate, the British government on Thursday overruled a local ban to greenlight a controversial fracking project in northern England.

"This is a sad day as it is clear to all that this government neither listens nor can it be trusted to do the right thing for local communities," said Pat Davies, chair of the Preston New Road Action Group, which is one of the local bodies that for years has fought against the project.

More than 18,000 residents of Lancashire objected to the plan for fracking giant Cuadrilla to drill up to four wells at the Preston New Road site, prompting local officials last year to reject the proposal. But Cuadrilla's appeal left the decision solely up to Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Sajid Javid, who on Thursday ruled in favor of the project. The decision to drill at a second site, Roseacre Wood, has been postponed.

[...]

"Instead of shoving us down a dangerous path that inevitably leads to climate change, the government should invest in renewables and energy efficiency, an emerging industry that could create 24,000 jobs in the north west alone," added Friends of the Earth (FOE) north-west campaigner Helen Rimmer. "This fight continues until this unproven and unpopular industry disappear for good."

[...]

http://commondreams.org/news/2016/10/06/uk-dismantles-democracy-double-down-fracked-gas

The fracking monster is slowly eating up parts of Europe. But resistance is more successful here than 'over there' because money plays a less prominent role in politics. Unfortunately, that is not always the case.

These types of decisions are only to do with money. If economic decision makers were rational, which economics as an academic discipline assumes to be the case, renewables and energy efficiency would win every time.
 
Friday, October 07, 2016
Common Dreams
Iceland, Where Bad Bankers Go to Jail, Finds Nine Guilty in Historic Case
Since its 2008 crisis, Iceland has received recognition for its strategy of prosecuting executives, letting banks go bust, and focusing on social welfare
Nadia Prupis, staff writer

iceland_reykjavik.jpg

The verdict from Iceland's Supreme Court overturns a June 2015 decision by the Reykjavik District Court, which found seven of the nine defendants guilty and acquitted two. (Photo: Daniel/flickr/cc)

Iceland, which became a gold standard for corporate accountability in the wake of its 2008-2011 financial crisis, has found nine bankers guilty for market manipulation in one of the biggest cases of its kind in the country's history.

The verdict from Iceland's Supreme Court, issued Thursday, overturns a June 2015 decision by the Reykjavik District Court, which found seven of the nine defendants guilty and acquitted two.

No punishment has been handed down yet, although sentencing is set to come. The defendants worked at the major international firm Kaupthing Bank until it was taken over by the Icelandic government during the crash. The bank's former director Hreiðar Már Sigurðsson, who had been sentenced to five and a half years in 2013 in a separate Kaupthing case, had his punishment extended by six months in response to the verdict.

The acquittals were overturned for former Kaupthing credit representative Björk Þórarinsdóttir and former Kaupthing Luxembourg CEO Magnús Guðmundsson, although no penalties have been meted out for them.

According to the Iceland Monitor, the decision found that "By fully financing share purchases with no other surety than the shares themselves, the bankers were accused of giving a false and misleading impression of demand for Kaupthing shares by means of deception and pretense."

Since the financial crisis, Iceland has received widespread recognition for its strategy of prosecuting bankers, imposing strict market controls, and allowing the international banks to go bust while the government supported domestic accounts and focused on social welfare—a far cry from the U.S. approach of bailing out its banks with taxpayer money and allowing their executives to escape punishment.

In 2015, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) announced that Iceland had achieved economic recovery, with employment rates that rivaled countries like the U.S., without compromising its free healthcare and education systems.

http://commondreams.org/news/2016/1...nkers-go-jail-finds-nine-guilty-historic-case

Iceland is the envy of the world. :anguished:
 
Thursday, October 06, 2016
Common Dreams
Judge Rules Ex-CIA Officials Can Be Questioned in Torture Case
'This order affirms that our judicial system can handle claims of CIA torture, including when those claims involve high-level government officials,' says ACLU
Nadia Prupis, staff writer

torture_protest.jpg

Human rights advocates say the ruling is a vital step for accountability. (Photo: Justin Norman/flickr/cc)

A federal judge has ordered that former CIA officials can be deposed in a lawsuit against the architects of the agency's torture program, in what human rights advocates say is a vital step for accountability.

The order (pdf), issued by U.S. District Court Senior Judge Justin Quackenbush earlier this week, rejected an attempt by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) that would have protected the officials from oral questioning. The deposition will be carried out as part of a discovery process for a case against the program's architects, psychologists James Mitchell and John "Bruce" Jessen, brought by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) on behalf of three men who were subjected to beatings, exposure to extreme temperature, sleep and food deprivation, and other abuses while in CIA custody.

Two of the four officials are John Rizzo and Jose Rodriguez, who both held high-ranking positions in the agency at the time the torture program was being developed and implemented. In a blog post about the order, the ACLU wrote of Rizzo, who was the CIA's chief lawyer for much of George W. Bush's administration:

Rizzo went along with the now-discredited Justice Department Office of Legal Counsel [OCL] memos that purported to approve torture, privately acknowledging the OLC's "ability to interpret over, under and around Geneva, the torture convention, and other pesky little international obligations." Rizzo also helped draft Bush's still-secret order authorizing the CIA to establish secret detention facilities overseas and to interrogate detainees.

Rodriguez has also defended the CIA's torture of detainees and, while at the agency, authorized the use of certain tactics. He also ordered the destruction of scores of videotapes showing waterboarding and other torture.

"This ruling is a critical step towards accountability, and it charts a way forward for torture victims to get their day in court," said ACLU staff attorney Dror Ladin. "For years, claims of secrecy shut the courthouse doors to survivors, but the systematic abuse of prisoners can't be swept under the rug forever. This order affirms that our judicial system can handle claims of CIA torture, including when those claims involve high-level government officials."

Two of the plaintiffs, Suleiman Abdullah Salim and Mohamed Ahmed Ben Soud, survived but continue to struggle physically and psychologically, the ACLU said. The third man, Gul Rahman, died of hypothermia in a secret CIA prison.

In a hearing last week, DOJ attorney Andrew Warden said, "It is, frankly, unprecedented...for the nation's top spy, the head of the National Clandestine Service to be deposed on operational information by a private party. I don't think that's ever happened in the history of this country."

The lawsuit against Mitchell and Jessen was filed in Washington state, where their law firm was based and where Jessen lives to this day. Although the ACLU says the depositions may help provide additional information about the program, the rights organization says the evidence they need to win the case has already been made public through reports like the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee's executive summary of its torture investigation.

http://commondreams.org/news/2016/10/06/judge-rules-ex-cia-officials-can-be-questioned-torture-case
http://commondreams.org/news/2016/10/06/judge-rules-ex-cia-officials-can-be-questioned-torture-case

This sounds really like a "structural break" (a fancy term that I learnt once).

And it happened in your state, Skare.
 
Published on
Friday, October 07, 2016
Common Dreams
Dirty and Deadly Oil Train Projects Meet Defeat in California and Washington
'The American people have spoken: They do not want dirty and dangerous fossil fuel projects that will threaten their communities, their clean air and water, and the climate'
Nika Knight, staff writer

oil-train-protest-seattle.jpg

Demonstrators rally against oil trains in 2015 in Seattle, Washington. (Photo: Stand.Earth/flickr.cc)

In what environmentalists described as a "historic victory," two separate proposed oil train facilities in Washington and California were roundly defeated this week.

"A few years ago, oil trains were the industry's back-door approach to getting crude oil to the market. Today, communities and decision makers along the West Coast are slamming that door shut."
—Matt Krogh, StandThe San Luis Obispo County Planning Commission on Wednesday voted 3-2 to reject a Phillips 66 oil train project, an outcome that was met by a standing ovation.

[...]

The decision surprised observers, as a measure to defeat the project had failed on a 3-2 vote in May. The swing vote, Commissioner Jim Irving, said he changed his vote because "I don't think the case has been made that we can override the recommendations of our staff and the county, so I will [be] voting against it."

Indeed, many locals and officials from the county as well as neighboring regions had come out against the proposal, fearing that a derailment could spill oil and contaminate land throughout the railway's proposed route.

County Commissioner Eric Meyer read an impassioned statement before the vote asking his fellow commissioners to help defeat the facility, saying, "How can you ignore the actual pleas of our neighboring representatives who represent more than 10 million citizens [in California]. You are willing to accept the possibility of a death, or 20, or 100 […] so this oil company can achieve a higher margin."

Meanwhile, Shell finally admitted defeat Thursday on an oil train facility in the small coastal town of Anacortes, Washington, by withdrawing its application for the project.

The plan would have brought fracked oil from Bakken fields of North Dakota to Anacortes by train, according to the Seattle Times.

More than 35,000 people had submitted public comments calling for the project to be rejected, notes the Sierra Club.

[...]

http://commondreams.org/news/2016/1...rojects-meet-defeat-california-and-washington


Are these rulings a sign of changing political dynamics in favor of protesters and local communities? Or is it just minor setbacks for the oil industry?
 
1,000s march for peace, against NATO in Berlin (VIDEO)
Published time: 10 Oct, 2016 09:34

57fb5cb5c4618874098b4597.png

© Ruptly

Thousands of anti-war demonstrators came out for a rally in Berlin over the weekend to protest the growing militarization of German policies and NATO’s confrontation with Russia over Syria.

On Saturday, protesters marched from Alexanderplatz to the Brandenburg Gate, where the demonstration continued with several speeches. German police estimated the number of participants at over 5,000, while the organizers said between 6,000 and 8,000 showed up.

Protesters said resources wasted on war would be better spent making life better for the people, demanding that Berlin scale down its military budget, withdraw its troops from all foreign missions, and stop selling arms to other governments.


“Our point of view is let’s come back to a politics of cooperation, dialogue and negotiations, we need these politics, not only in Syria and Ukraine, but all over the world in many, many countries,” one protester named Reiner Braun told Ruptly.

“The German government is definitely going the wrong way. Sanctions are not helpful; confrontation are not helpful; German troops in Poland and Ukraine are not helpful, so we are calling for deep change of the German politics against Russia,” he added.

The “Lay Down Your Arms” demonstration was organized by left-wing forces, which distanced themselves from right-wing groups for the latest event.

Left Party MP Sahra Wagenknecht, who was the key speaker at the protest, criticized the continued violence in Syria and the latest collapse of cooperation between Russia and the US, which has left the prospect of a peaceful resolution of the five-year-long conflict as distant as ever.

https://www.rt.com/news/362210-peace-protest-berlin-nato/
http://www.theeventchronicle.com/news/europe/1000s-march-peace-nato-berlin-video/
http://www.theeventchronicle.com/news/europe/1000s-march-peace-nato-berlin-video/
How about some variation to a traditional theme: make apple pie, not war. :m026:
 
Study: Public Schools Legally Beating Children at Alarming Rate—Thousands of Kids Left Injured
Even animals have better protection than children in public schools.
By Justin Gardner / The Free Thought Project
October 10, 2016

shutterstock_143878204.jpg

Row of multiethnic elementary students reading book in classroom
Photo Credit: bikeriderlondon/Shutterstock

A new report, analyzing data from the U.S. Department of Education, shows that a shocking level of corporal punishment — where school personnel physically strike a child — is still being carried out in public schools.

The Society for Research in Child Development reported that more than 160,000 children were subject to corporal punishment in one year, in the 19 states which have not banned the practice. The report represents “the first-ever effort to describe the prevalence of and disparities in the use of school corporal punishment at the school and school-district levels.”

Most of this barbarity is carried out in southeastern states, and there appears to be a great deal of prejudice. In many states, children with disabilities were 50% more likely to receive corporal punishment than non-disabled children. In Alabama and Mississippi, black children were 51% more likely to be physically punished than white children in more than half of school districts.

Mississippi also has the dubious honor of being the state with the highest frequency, with 1 in 14 kids being physically struck by school personnel.

The behavior leading to corporal punishment ranges from bullying or setting off fireworks in school to “being late to class, failing to turn in homework, violating dress codes, running in the hallway, laughing in the hallway, sleeping in class, talking back to teachers, going to the bathroom without permission, mispronouncing words, and receiving bad grades.”

Even more disturbing, a review of 2003 data found that 10,000-20,000 children had to get medical treatment for bruises, hematomas, broken bones, and nerve and muscle damage after being struck by school authorities.

This abhorrent level of abuse is enabled by codes that give school administrators wide discretion, such as Texas, which defines corporal punishment as:

“…the deliberate infliction of physical pain by hitting, paddling, spanking, slapping, or any other physical force used as a means of discipline.” (Texas Education Code, 2013)

Some states specifically exempt school personnel from liability under child abuse laws, such as Wyoming which states:

Teachers, principals and superintendents in each district shall be immune from civil and criminal liability in the exercise of reasonable corporal discipline of a student as authorized by board policy.

In many cases, if a parent carried out the same punishment it would be considered abuse and give cause for the state to take their child away. One nurse, after treating an injury from corporal punishment, testified that she would have called child protective services if it had happened at home instead of school.

Missouri even “explicitly prevents its child protective services department from having any jurisdiction to investigate allegations of child abuse stemming from school corporal punishment.”

This is a shocking amount of vulnerability that the State deliberately creates for children, and the fact that it still exists in 2016 is unbelievable.

Corporal punishment is considered a human rights violation in accordance with the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child. Thirty-four prominent national organizations – including the National Association of State Departments of Education and the American Medical Association – oppose the use of corporal punishment, as well as the vast majority of Americans, according to polls.

Even animals have better protection than children in public schools. In most U.S. states, hitting an animal to the point of injury is a felony, but doing the same to a child is exempt from child maltreatment laws in most states where corporal punishment in schools is legal.

In general, the use of corporal punishment has declined greatly over the last few decades, despite a 1977 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that actually legitimized its use (Ingraham v. Wright). The 19 states still allowing its use are doing so in spite of research showing that it does not work and has negative consequences for a child’s development.

“Corporal punishment is not effective at increasing compliance in the short-term or at promoting long-term compliance and moral behavior. The more children receive corporal punishment, the more likely they are to be aggressive and to misbehave over time, over and above how aggressive or disobedient they are initially.”

“Corporal punishment has been linked with a range of unintended negative outcomes, including higher rates of mental health problems, a more negative parent-child relationship, lower cognitive ability and academic achievement, and higher risk for physical abuse.”

Corporal punishment is even banned in prison and military training facilities, but in 19 states children are still subject to this antiquated, barbaric practice. Twelve of these states have banned corporal punishment in “other publicly funded settings that care for children, suggesting that these states already recognize the harm corporal punishment can pose to children.”

If the adults in the video below would have held down and attempted to strike another adult, this would be considered assault. However, when the victim is a defenseless 5-year-old boy — it’s called education.


While the senseless brutality against children in public schools goes on, the federal government remains virtually silent. Even though it collects the data showing up in the report, corporal punishment is almost never mentioned in reports from the Department of Education, as the authors note.

In a country that claims to be one of the most advanced on earth, its most defenseless citizens are left vulnerable to public school authorities who believe physically injuring a child is the path to educational success.

http://www.alternet.org/education/schools-legally-beating-children

(my emphasis is the underlined text, that of the author the bold text)

I am absolutely horrified that this stuff happens. Future Guantanamo Bays begin at home.

Any act of physical and many acts of mental child punishment were made illegal in Sweden in 1979.

Why cannot the public spank politicians that invade other countries on false evidence, bankers that crash banks?
 
Campus Workers Unmask Scheme to Privatize All Tennessee Property
Governor Bill Haslam concocted the biggest privatization scheme you’ve never heard of.
By Melanie Barron , Jeffrey Lichtenstein / Portside
October 9, 2016

6787712500_2b25d253c0_z.jpg

Photo Credit: U.S. Department of Agriculture / Flickr Creative Commons

Every state has a procurement office. Have you checked what yours is up to?

In Tennessee it was through this office, charged with overseeing the state’s purchases and contracts, that Governor Bill Haslam concocted the biggest privatization scheme you’ve never heard of.

And he would have gotten away with it, too—if it weren’t for a tough campus-workers union that discovered his plans and launched a raucous fight.

Haslam, with a net worth of $2 billion, is America’s richest elected politician. His family owns the Pilot Flying J chain of truck stops. In 2014 he began taking quiet steps to outsource more than 10,000 state workers.

Several well-paid consultants joined his administration, including one who gets paid more per hour than any other state employee. They began work in the little-known, slickly titled Office of Customer Focused Government.

The plan they cooked up was unprecedented. Management and maintenance of literally every piece of state property would be privatized—campuses, parks, even armories—costing the jobs of 1 in 5 state workers.

Billions in revenue would be funneled to a single private company. It’s rumored that one of the top contenders is Jones Lang LaSalle, already a state contractor and a company where Haslam has a record of personal investment.

Equally shocking, instead of battling it out in the legislature, Haslam’s plan would rely on executive authority. An approach called “vested outsourcing” meant that the most favored corporations would help write the request for proposals.

STATEWIDE REBELLION

As soon as UCW heard about the privatization scheme in August 2015, it leaked the plan to the press and launched a campaign called “Tennessee Is Not for Sale.”

A town-hall phone call for members attracted hundreds of participants. Days later, 200 workers, students, and community allies lined the main avenue that cuts across the flagship campus in Knoxville. The union brought some signs and banners, but the best ones came from facilities workers, who showed up to the Thursday-afternoon rally in uniform.

Of all the workers on a campus, we’ve found facilities workers to be some of the toughest to organize. They cover a variety of shops—carpentry, air conditioning, electrical, painting, custodial, housekeeping, and clerical and administrative support staff. They tend to be a tight-knit group, and sometimes insular.

But this crisis inspired record numbers of facilities workers to mobilize, and many to join the union.

AMBUSHING THE GOVERNOR
Excitement from this rally fueled more actions across the state, as images of the protest circulated on Facebook and in the news. Members held signs on university sidewalks in Memphis and Johnson City.

Sympathetic lawmakers did a “fact-finding tour,” visiting campuses in Knoxville and Chattanooga where they invited workers to speak on panels about the governor’s scheme. A paper and online petition drew 6,000 signatures.

At every opportunity, members confronted the governor personally and posted the videos on social media. We tracked him down at events where he might have expected a friendly crowd—including a Chamber of Commerce meeting, the opening of a new business institute at UT, and even his high school alma mater’s homecoming football game.

Each time, our members gleefully rained on his parade, ruined his photo-ops, and forced him to flee to his armored car.

Our earlier coalition work for “Put the People First” paid off. Community groups in several areas hosted their own town-hall meetings and passed resolutions against the plan. We built the broadest possible front, even allying with several key Republication legislators, atypical friends in Tennessee’s hostile-to-labor political environment.

DECISIVE MOMENT
These months of action generated a steady drumbeat of embarrassing media coverage for the governor. It all crescendoed to March 8, when 100 union members converged on the Capitol steps with students and allies from environmental, health care, and workers’ rights groups.

We rallied, we lobbied—and then we occupied a hallway, just outside a Senate committee room where outsourcing operatives were scheduled to talk. Union members unfurled three giant rolls of paper, dozens of feet long, with thousands of petition signatures. Chanting workers and students took up the rest of the space.

Later, members packed the same committee room and were gratified to hear several legislators, including Republicans, speak out against the outsourcing. UCW had split the state’s ruling coalition on this issue.

“We forced Republican members of the legislature to side with their constituents,” said Dalton Brown, a leader in the carpentry shop at the UT Health Science Center in Memphis. “Whatever plan the governor may have had to get the legislature to give him some cover from the clear popular and media opposition—that was gone.”

[...]

But so far, workers and the public aren’t buying it, in part because Haslam’s credibility has already been so damaged by the campaign. Our message, “Tennessee Is Not for Sale,” is clear and direct. People get it.

The governor’s other tactic is to drag out the process, hoping the public will lapse into fatigue and forgetfulness. Originally the outsourcing would have been implemented already, in July. Now the contract is expected to be signed next February, and implementation could begin as soon as March.

[...]

http://www.alternet.org/labor/privitazing-all-tennessee-property


Gratifying. An interesting tale of how people power trumps corporate greed.

Using executive authority. That way, the governor's signature is sufficient without any input from the legislature. Clever boy. Psychopaths always rely on tricks. But the unions were cleverer when they embarrassed the governor in public. :laughing:

I am sure that the governor found a distressing retreat in his armored car. :dizzy:

The unions are the life blood of USA.
 
Monday, October 10, 2016
Speak Freely / ACLU
The Surveillance State Descends on the Dakota Access Pipeline Spirit Camp
Sabrina King, Will Munger

filming-me-filming-you.jpg

Police and a water protector film each other at a peaceful protest in front of a police roadblock in St. Anthony, North Dakota. (Photo: Courtesy of ACLU)

For the past six months, at the confluence of the Cannonball and Missouri Rivers, history has been made at one of the largest international gatherings of indigenous people in recent history. Representatives from well over 100 indigenous nations and thousands of people have camped, prayed, and taken action in solidarity with the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe against the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline on and near the tribe’s sovereign land in North Dakota.

And for the past six weeks, history has repeated itself as the Morton County Sheriff’s Office has dramatically increased its surveillance of the gathering, militarized the county, and taken action to suppress the religious expression of the indigenous people gathered at Sacred Stone.

The use of surveillance, military-style force, and religious oppression against indigenous people has a long history in this country. Today, on Indigenous Peoples’ Day, and at a moment of surging indigenous power and strength, we bring light to the ongoing repression of the indigenous nations by Morton County and the state of North Dakota.

[...]

When construction on the pipeline began earlier this year, members of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and allies gathered at Sacred Stone and began a permanent spirit camp to pray and bring attention to the injustice of DAPL’s route and the risks it poses to land, water, and cultural resources. Over the summer, the camp grew, eventually spilling over into an overflow camp, known as the Oceti Sakowin camp, as well as several others in the same area. The camps have held, at times, thousands of people who come to pray and stand together in solidarity.

[...]

http://commondreams.org/views/2016/...e-descends-dakota-access-pipeline-spirit-camp

The fight goes on, but the protestors ("water protectors") are not intimidated by harrassment. They remain peaceful and united.

This has been going on for six months. It is like the Occupy movement but less chaotic. More people are reading independent news and not relying on corporate media for getting information.

But how are they going to manage the winter?
 
Published on
Monday, October 10, 2016
Common Dreams
After Court Lifts Injunction, Government Once Again Calls for Voluntary Halt to Dakota Access
As arrests of water protectors continued on Monday, joint letter from three agencies says that Standing Rock Sioux objections should be considered
Jon Queally, staff writer

nodapl_woodley_army_corp.jpg

Images from on the ground in North Dakota on Monday where local law enforcement confronted water protectors standing against the Dakota Access Pipeline. (Photo: TwitPic/@JaneKleeb)

Repeating a previous request last month, federal agencies on Monday asked the company building the Dakota Access Pipeline to voluntarily halt construction so that objections raised by the Standing Rock Sioux and other tribes can be properly considered.

A joint statement issued by the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, the Department of the Interior, and the Justice Department asked for the pause in work less than 24 hours after a federal court lifted an unjunction against the controversial oil pipeline that opponents say threatens regional water supplies and infringes on tribal sovereignty.

According to Reuters, the joint statement said the Army Corp is still reviewing concerns raised by the Standing Rock Sioux tribe and other tribal nations about the pipeline's path.

On Monday, protests against the pipeline continued with numerous arrests, including that of actress Shailene Woodley who live-streamed her arrest on Facebook live:

Despite Sunday's court ruling, pipeline opponents vowed to continue, and intensify, their resistance the project.

"Our hearts and minds go to the pipeline fighters," said Tom Goldtooth, executive director of the Indigenous Environmental Network. "[We] will continue to use prayer and peaceful civil disobedience to disrupt business-as-usual and stop this black snake from being completed. This fight is far from over."

http://commondreams.org/news/2016/1...rnment-once-again-calls-voluntary-halt-dakota


Great that government agencies are not blindly obeying companies.
 
Back
Top