Pristinegirl
Well-known member
- MBTI
- ANFP
Fulfilling criteria is one thing, but was your argument/reasoning sound? Were you convincing? If not then you can fulfill criteria and still get a lower mark.
I wish I would have been around to respond to this thread, I would have helped you if you wanted my help. You could have just sent a copy of your speech to me.
Thank you so much for caring, I really appreciate it.
I can send you a copy if you wan't because tomorrow I'm going to talk to him about how it was unfair advantage to the others who were allowed a discussion and questions to raise their grade. And the fact that I did reach all criterias for top marks but still got a low score. Although my mother think that he was joking with the wink because he knew that I was worried.
Anyway, my arguments were very well reasoned and I took on different perspectives. Believe me I spoke to several people including my mentor and coordinator who told me to talk to him and confront him. If he does not justify his reason and rethink the advantage thing, there will be an investigation.
Also, there were two other boys who made a presentation together who simply READ FACTS out of a history books. Quoting somebody elses works the whole time but attained 17 marks when the criteria stated that different perspectives and a personal approach should be taken.