Neither, I avoid conflict, LOL. It is just my observant opinion.
Well, to be more complete, I think the issue is that everything is so 'big' now. the National Government 'serves' 300 million people, and businesses have tens of thousands of locations serving millions overall.
When business and government were smaller there was some sort of personal accountability like there is with local government and small business. People actually
know you. Your customers or voters are a part of your life. Since they know you and the people you spend time with there is accountability. People know if you walk the walk.
This simply isn't true in big business and big government. With 3 million people making up a mere 1% of a vote and the entire annual income of a small town barely matching the weekly income of some businesses, statistics suddenly becomes incredibly important. You say and do the things that give you the highest return on your investment (in votes or dollars).
Eventually the principled business person or politician has to make a choice between more votes/money or a principled stand. The competition is playing to win whatever the cost, so they never make that sacrifice intentionally. They win via statistics: enough people will 'believe the lies' to make it more 'profitable' than principle.
Now you
could get people to change their perceptions at the grass roots level. The reason this doesn't change the world is the incredible monetary investment required to get the word out and educate enough people to change voting/spending statistics. Those that have the money to do this aren't interested in 'wasting' capital to support something that is unprofitable and potentially damaging to the status quo.
I don't like things the way they are. It makes no sense in my heart. But for the life of me I can't figure out a way to
change enough opinions to change the game.