and a topic that needs to and is being covered for many years. We have 2 nuclear power plants (Doel, Tihange) that are beyond their active operation cycle (a 10 year post-operation "grace" period). When they shut down, Belgium will lose around 40% of its power generation (
http://www.elia.be/~/media/files/Elia/PressReleases/2019/20190118_Press-Release-Chiffres-2018_NL.pdf , it's lower in 2018 due to the shutdown of some reactor towers for maintenance), leaving a gap for the demand.
None of the political parties have given a proper solution to what we're going to do, they propose to a) "create gas power plants", which are too inefficient which means that a lot of gas fuel needs to be pulled from the environment, which is bad. Others propose "more solar panels and wind mills", which are good on their own but not good enough as continuous power systems as they depend on wind/solar energy.
There are even some that propose to prolong the current nuclear reactors, which is just plain dangerous. There is one Party that proposed an experimental Thorium reactor, which is good but they are also in the pool of "extended the lifetime of the current reactor".
But there are intermediary solutions that can cover as much as possible in the meantime during the shutdown. A Generation 4 nuclear power plant (or even a thorium reactor) for example could cover the power generation gap for a certain period while we are further pushing more green solutions. It may not be the best solution but it's much better than the older Generation 2 reactors that we have now and a lot cleaner. Or we can use sea turbine systems that can take over some of the power generation. Or we can use a mix of the proposed solutions (gas/wind/solar/biofuel even/get it from nearby countries). Anything at least to shut down the current reactors ASAP and generate enough power the best we can for the environment.
Energy generation is a difficult topic to cover as it's just not about generating energy but distributing it properly over the whole (European) net, which requires heavy monitoring and a lot of paperwork to maintain these within Europe. But it's bothersome that none would take a step further and look for any other solutions than what's beyond currently available as a "quick fix" and now we are still stuck with what we have and will probably take on a less favorable solution in the end. The elections are this month and I don't have an idea who to vote for now. They are covering other topics in their campaigns. It's annoying as this is also an essential topic that needs to be covered in time.