Sociacademic
Newbie
- MBTI
- N/A
- Enneagram
- N/A
I thought this video was a bit overly simplistic. I was expecting it to go on and show more examples of behavior for a bit longer. Slight bias towards Fe was also evident. The only thing Fi would've had "over" Fe according to this video, would be genuineness.
Agreed, it would be more balanced if there had been extra material with Garfield demonstrating additional positive sides of Fi.
Do you have any suggestions for aspects of Fi you'd appreciate seeing illustrated in a future video?
I thought the Garfield sitting thing was a weak case for Fi being shown. Why would it be considered inappropriate to put shoes on the couch if his interview partner was doing so already?
From the YouTube comments on the video: "That's a good question. It is true that she has established precedence for sitting that way; however, putting one's shoes on the couch is normally considered to be such bad manners that a well-developed Fe user might still feel the need to communicate that he is aware of the breach of propriety. For instance, he might have said something like 'I'm going to let Carey be a bad influence on me and put my feet up too.'"
(Also, that clip is shown not as positive evidence of Fi, but as negative evidence of the absence of Fe. There's a difference!)
According to this video, I would probably come across as more Fe in most circumstances in my daily life.
I would say you are well-rounded then - as indeed your 'Develop ALL the functions!' tagline would indicate. Of course there are always exceptions, but do you think it is inaccurate to say that most Fi users generally behave more like Garfield than like Mulligan?
Last edited: