- MBTI
- INFJ
- Enneagram
- 954 so/sx
Did I log onto the INTJ forum by mistake?
Yes
Did I log onto the INTJ forum by mistake?
OK, so I've just started a PhD in history, and getting to know the other students on my intake; we've socialised three times now, mainly with two others - a girl (26) and a guy (27).
However, I'm actually getting pretty exasperated by the way they have discussions, or rather, the way they take my points.
In essence, it seems like they can't fully engage with difficult ideas in what I would describe as a properly intellectual way - that is, considering some ideas as 'positions', not taking things personally, and engaging with these positions on logical grounds.
For instance, tonight we were talking about the work of some evolutionary biologists in the twentieth century who concluded that the basis of empathy was gene selection - individuals therefore feel more empathetic towards others who resemble themselves (genetically, ethnically, &c.), and the implications this had for the nation state, including the history of the twentieth century as one of massive ethnic disaggregation.
The guy got more and more uncomfortable until he eventually said he had to go, and that was the end of the evening.
I was really really surprised in a bemused way that they seemed to be taking this personally and it made them uncomfortable, as if they had sacred cows; things that ought not to be discussed.
Now, maybe I'm used to discussing things with more mature people, since this kind of discussion is usually enjoyable and engaging, and we come up with interesting 'solutions' and definitions of ethics, &c., but I got the sense that they didn't know how to properly debate.
Anyway, what do you think of this? It's got me annoyed.
Am I being antisocial bringing this challenging stuff up?
Are they intellectually immature?
What? Your thoughts? Experiences?
INFJs read people well, but it doesn't mean we can communicate with people well.
I'm 'projecting' my image of an ideal friend upon them and being disappointed when they don't match that.
Yes, yes, yes to that. Absolutely true!
It's also related to my own stance of being (overly?) comfortable with who I am and what I find interesting, and in a certain sense 'imposing' that upon them.
OK so, before I reply to the specific points raised when I get home (a lot to chew on there), I should add that I did talk to @Puzzlenuzzle about this last night, and a lot of interesting things came up which may be of interest to INFJs more generally.
In particular, she thought this was related to the kind of friendships that I want to cultivate, and therefore how I want to make friends; that in other words what I was doing was a kind of 'test' - have the conversations I want to have with them and hope they're on board; that I'm 'projecting' my image of an ideal friend upon them and being disappointed when they don't match that. This as opposed to, say, feeling them out a bit more and taking smaller conversational steps.
It's also related to my own stance of being (overly?) comfortable with who I am and what I find interesting, and in a certain sense 'imposing' that upon them.
Yes, yes, yes, yes to that. From my experience, being aware of this can make things even worse. If you are being too nice/considerate, it's subtlety devaluating and leaves the opponent with an even worse self feeling. And at the same time you take away their momentum to emotionally object to your style, and turns to immature/ irrational passive aggression in order to cope with you.
OK, so I've just started a PhD in history, and getting to know the other students on my intake; we've socialised three times now, mainly with two others - a girl (26) and a guy (27).
However, I'm actually getting pretty exasperated by the way they have discussions, or rather, the way they take my points.
In essence, it seems like they can't fully engage with difficult ideas in what I would describe as a properly intellectual way - that is, considering some ideas as 'positions', not taking things personally, and engaging with these positions on logical grounds.
For instance, tonight we were talking about the work of some evolutionary biologists in the twentieth century who concluded that the basis of empathy was gene selection - individuals therefore feel more empathetic towards others who resemble themselves (genetically, ethnically, &c.), and the implications this had for the nation state, including the history of the twentieth century as one of massive ethnic disaggregation.
The guy got more and more uncomfortable until he eventually said he had to go, and that was the end of the evening.
I was really really surprised in a bemused way that they seemed to be taking this personally and it made them uncomfortable, as if they had sacred cows; things that ought not to be discussed.
Now, maybe I'm used to discussing things with more mature people, since this kind of discussion is usually enjoyable and engaging, and we come up with interesting 'solutions' and definitions of ethics, &c., but I got the sense that they didn't know how to properly debate.
Anyway, what do you think of this? It's got me annoyed.
Am I being antisocial bringing this challenging stuff up?
Are they intellectually immature?
What? Your thoughts? Experiences?
Gaze said:By looking at their view as just wrong, you won't learn anything or grow in your own development as an intellectual.
It's got me annoyed.
Several things I would like to share from my own way of thinking, which may or may not be for everybody(or anyone but myself).
I like conversations of sharing about each other. I dislike debates. I get a bit "en garde" when a conversation turns toward the debate road.
As for maturity of intellect? Reminds me of a 25 year old intelligent, good looking, and wholesome young lady trapped by boys that want to play. Makes me want to say sometimes, "stop pushing her and grow up". Do they seek older men for their understanding? Maybe some do. I sense a lonely person surrounded by people. People are all different, and things are always changing. Think about razors for shaving. Sometimes maybe we must change with the changes(or make our very own razors).
Man I was talking with one fine morning at a hunting camp acknowledged he felt the same as I regarding something. I did drag him away before asking. Yet, he let things lay the way they were. He said, "I believe when in Rome, do as the Romans do" and that he was just a guest. Said that was how they had done for years.
My advice: try a different approach and engage a little differently. Most importantly, try not to do this:
This is what most (not all) people say to me. Even though I explicitly state, over and over, that Im just having a conversation and not endorsing any positions. Ive just learned that if the person I'm talking to does not get it the first two times, then don't talk to them again. Its not my responsibility to keep reassuring them that I'm not trying to attack them.
I think that some people just don't accept that positions aren't opinions; I suppose it's just too unnatural or counterintuitive.
It better not to bring up controversial conversations with people we don't know well.
I can definitely see how the topic Deleted member 16771 was discussing with his peers would make some uncomfortable.
I think that some people just don't accept that positions aren't opinions