Do you have an explanation as to how you have determined this? I fail to see how liberalism leads to chaos.
Because its a system that is incovenient, it doesn't take into account what a population with those kind of rights might become.
It has been clearly observed in history that a population whithout strong leadership and a authority, will colapse inside. Disorder is the word. Everyone will do what he likes (of course, within that established laws). It is a self-contradictory system. After some time, it will destroy itself by its own principles. In terms of efficienty, longetivity, stability, clarity, order this philosophy is faulty.
And this is also because man can not be equal, in the sense of how they advance in society. One man works like 10 others at a time. He would have more money, more influence, and more....POWER and force. Can libertarianism prohibit that? No.(marxism can!)
And what is happening? There would be a total confusion on society. Kind of like gangs and mafia. Points of power woudl raise that would compete with each other, thereby forcing a clear order, a hierarchy, which is much more dangerous then if it would be from the beginning, already established. It leads to domination, whithout the accord of authority. It would be kind of unofficial authority, a shaddow force. Here is how Blaise Pascal puts it:
Justice is what is established; and thus all our established laws will necessarily be regarded as just without examination, since they are established.
and:
How rightly do we distinguish men by external appearances rather than by internal qualities! Which of us two shall have precedence? Who will give place to the other? The least clever. But I am as clever as he. We should have to fight over this. He has four lackeys, and I have only one. This can be seen; we have only to count. It falls to me to yield, and I am a fool if I contest the matter. By this means we are at peace, which is the greatest of boons.
On what shall man found the order of the world which he would govern? Shall it be on the caprice of each individual? What confusion! Shall it be on justice? Man is ignorant of it.
Yes. Communism often results in this. Liberalism or libertarianism as some refer to it can exist in a democracy or even a republic which has a defined authority. Libertarianism simply follows the philosophy i stated earlier and so will limit the amount of authority a government has to necessary proportions
.
Yes, but people need authority within themselfs, within society. Slowly but surely, force would establish everything.