Major Censorship Incident

slant

Capitalist pig
Donor
MBTI
None
I think the majority of us have become aware of the censorship going on in social media platforms in the United States or platforms run by United States based companies since the pandemic. There is a possibility this level of censorship was going on long before that point but only became obvious to the general population at that point.

According to this article,

CEO Mark Zuckerberg said the Biden administration had pressured the company to "censor" COVID-19 content during the pandemic, apparently referring to White House requests to take down misinformation about the coronavirus and vaccines.
In a letter dated Aug. 26, Zuckerberg told the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee that he regretted not speaking up about this pressure earlier, as well as other decisions he had made as the owner of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp around removing certain content.

This thread is not going to be about the pandemic censorship though; I am just providing it as context to set up that this has been ongoing since at least 2020 if not before. This could easily loop into my dead internet theory thread where a majority of internet websites have sort of 'vanished' because they are indexed by google and not showing up on search results.

The control that these monopolies such as google and facebook have on our ability of locate information, in combination with their relationship with the United States Government and willingness to perform censorship on instruction, is quite troubling. I have to wonder how far we are from China level censorship. If there were stages of censorship, which are we in? How far will this go?

Ok, so we've established pretty clearly that some social media sites like Facebook are claiming that the government required them to censor information.

Microsoft on the other hand has willingly participated in upholding firewalls in China and censoring information.

In spring 2021, just before the 32nd anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre, users of Microsoft’s Bing search engine in the US and Europe noticed something odd. Bing had stopped displaying famous photographs of Tank Man—the lone protester who blocked an armored column during the pro-democracy demonstrations of 1989. “There are no results for ‘tank man,’ ” announced the search engine in response to search queries. “Check your spelling or try different keywords.”

What is the most recent incident?

The active removal of Joe Rogan's interview with Trump on Youtube search results. This is a real, documented thing that as far as I can measure started happening a couple of days after it was released. When it was first dropped, it was recommended in my feed as most Joe Rogan videos are since I am subscribed. But then a couple of days later when I searched for it, it did not appear on the first page of results despite having millions of views. I found it on page three. Even logging out and searching had the same results. This was reported by others, according to Forbes:

Rogan tweeted Tuesday his now-prominent interview faced “an issue with searching for this episode on YouTube” and uploaded the video in its entirety to X (Rogan did not speculate on the cause of the issue).

Rogan also reposted a video from David Heinemeier Hansson, the CTO of software firm 37signals, showing dozens of incorrect videos appearing in his YouTube search and saying it “would be beyond bonkers if they're actively trying to suppress it. Must be a glitch, right?”

Hansson is one of dozens of X accounts reporting issues with finding the interview or noting YouTube’s search function showed snippets of the Trump interview instead of the full video, as some users appear to imply YouTube had intentionally suppressed it, with billionaire Elon Musk posting on X, “YouTube experienced some uh … technical difficulties.”

There is no direct evidence YouTube deliberately did not show the interview, which remains available and appears in search results when attempted by Forbes.
Ok- so its anecdotal. But we're having a discussion so might as well have a starting point.

I started to research this thing, "Polymarket" and the possible social engineering motivations behind it. At first I thought it was data mining but when you look into it looks like they are more trying to influence public opinion and views especially in regards to the election but in reality that is a hook to get people on the platform, there is a ton of social engineering going on there- Peter Thiel, Cambridge Analytica are backing this platform. Suspicious. And the most suspicious thing is that they are a sponsor of The Young Turks, a left-wing political platform which you ordinarily wouldn't see associated with this. So I was, dumbly, trying to find youtube videos people have made about this because I have seen at least one from a small time youtuber that i am subscribed to on the topic. Despite putting in the key words, not only does this youtube video I have already watched not come up, but there are no relevant videos that pull up. In fact, none of the videos they show are even loosely connected to the keywords I put in. On a platform with millions and millions of videos, and I know at least 1 video exists with those keywords, nothing pulls up??

Further down the rabbit hole, I use chat-gpt and other ai models to ask for a website which can provide a solution to bypass youtube's algorithm- basically a third party site that will search for me. I get given two options: searchmyvideo and petey vid. I google these (remember, google is tied to youtube) and no results related to this websites. there are some websites that are like 'top 10 alternates' and sort of explain what these websites are, but all links to these websites go to either:

a. a broken webpage, this website does not exist

or

b. an insecure web page warning me to go back, that attackers may be trying to steal my information.

I keep seeing these HUGE gaps in the internet, broken websites and links, mentions of things existing that do not exist, trying to access something and finding you have to jump through hoops to actually access something.

This is nuts, right?
 
I gotta think about all this some more but at first glance it's like 50/50 unjustified fear and hyperbole vs some level of truth to obfuscation for less than good reasons.
Also I was hilariously reminded of this
 
Excellent post. A couple of three points to consider:
  1. It’s only censorship, in the legal sense of the word, if the government enacts it. Other parties, on private platforms of whatever kind may do as they wish. Which includes saying no, if and when the government asks.
  2. Does anyone regret—and if so, who?—the 1987 overturn of the 1949 Fairness Doctrine? Inasmuch as I am old enough to have seen and experienced it, and then the after, I think this a shit-show, full stop.
  3. Continuation of the status quo, with its attendant lucrative rewards, somewhat explains the culture war battle against the teaching of critical thinking in schools.
Cheers,
Ian
 
When there are so many sociopaths and psychopaths in power issues like this should come as no surprise as such are control oriented for which society suffers sometimes greatly so.
 
Excellent post. A couple of three points to consider:
  1. It’s only censorship, in the legal sense of the word, if the government enacts it. Other parties, on private platforms of whatever kind may do as they wish. Which includes saying no, if and when the government asks.
Cheers,
Ian
I find it quite hypocritical that those that are most supportive of the right of corporate individuality are so apt to cry "censorship", when the corporation exercise their right to control what happens on their property. If one is behaving in a manner that is offensive to me, in my own home, I have every right to ask them to leave. If one doesn't feel welcome, they are free to find another social group (Is this not the most socially conservative POV anyways?).
 
I tried to find the Rogan Trump video on YouTube. It required a bit of finessing to find it. I was surprised, given how many views it had.

YouTube went to crap years ago anyway.
 
I find it quite hypocritical that those that are most supportive of the right of corporate individuality are so apt to cry "censorship", when the corporation exercise their right to control what happens on their property. If one is behaving in a manner that is offensive to me, in my own home, I have every right to ask them to leave. If one doesn't feel welcome, they are free to find another social group (Is this not the most socially conservative POV anyways?).

OK, so you must be OK with Musk acquiring Twitter and turning into what it is today (a far right extremist platform, according to some). So our social media platforms should be under a whim of a single person's desires? Free speech is just a battle of billionaires enforcing their "property rights" over their property.

I always say to people. If you support censorship in favor of your favorite politician, be ready when your least favorite politician takes over and silences you.

YouTube censoring TrumpXRogan is stupid and counterproductive and creepy. No other ways about it.
 
Internet searches suck and have for the last few years. Monetization and AI are the most acceptable answers but it would be foolish to rule out highly motivated US Gov agencies. It may well be that the various intelligence agency really believe that trump is a national security risk as many of their retired ranks openly state.
 
I guess that the political aspect of it is relevant but it also seems to make the conversation deter beyond the intention.

I don't think it's necessarily about *what* is getting censored or for what reason as much as it is the massive amount of it that has been happening under our noses with little acknowledgement. There's this idea that we are free in the United States and have freedom of not only speech but access to information, but it's clear that we don't. Just because it's not the government limiting our information doesn't make our country any different than one that is being controlled by a government and censored.

The other day I thought to myself, we do have freedom of speech in America- you can say whatever you want. It's just that no one will hear you. So if we're allowed to speak but speech is made inaccessible to others, It's really just an illusion.
 
For what it's worth, I had zero trouble finding the video both on YouTube and on Google, desktop and mobile.
I Googled it the day after it came out as well as days following and found multiple results containing links to it directly as well as snippets.

SmartSelect_20241031_100519_Google.webp
 
OK, so you must be OK with Musk acquiring Twitter and turning into what it is today (a far right extremist platform, according to some). So our social media platforms should be under a whim of a single person's desires? Free speech is just a battle of billionaires enforcing their "property rights" over their property.
I don’t like the outcome or result, but I am okay with it in principle and as a reflection of the law within civil society.

Inasmuch as the social media company networks are not common carriers, they may rightfully do whatever they like.

Cheers,
Ian
 
OK, so you must be OK with Musk acquiring Twitter and turning into what it is today (a far right extremist platform, according to some). So our social media platforms should be under a whim of a single person's desires? Free speech is just a battle of billionaires enforcing their "property rights" over their property.

I always say to people. If you support censorship in favor of your favorite politician, be ready when your least favorite politician takes over and silences you.

YouTube censoring TrumpXRogan is stupid and counterproductive and creepy. No other ways about it.

Well I am not personally ok with far right anything taking over our culture. I am not quite sure what to think of what is going on with Twitter. It is obviously being very badly managed. If it continues on this path, perhaps it will likely collapse as a major social media platform as it becomes more exclusionary and inflammatory, and eventually an echo chamber.
 
For what it's worth, I had zero trouble finding the video both on YouTube and on Google, desktop and mobile.
I Googled it the day after it came out as well as days following and found multiple results containing links to it directly as well as snippets.

View attachment 95974
Right it's been fixed. It was for a short period of time, and after attention was drawn to it, it was fixed. It was more about trying to illustrate a point.
 
Right it's been fixed. It was for a short period of time, and after attention was drawn to it, it was fixed. It was more about trying to illustrate a point.

My point was, at no point did I have trouble finding it. It never needed "fixing" for me.

I do understand your overall point though, and other incidents have occurred.
My pet theory is that it has more to do with people's profiles that Google has built for the end user,
and their poor attempts at serving people what they want (they think they know better than the consumer).
 
Another angle to this according to newsweek:

Rogan wrote on X, formerly Twitter, on October 26: "There is no issue with YouTube censoring the Trump episode. It was just supposed to go live on both Spotify and YouTube at the same time and there was a glitch in Spotify's upload system and so we delisted the YouTube link until it's fixed. It should be fine now."

However, several days after Rogan said there was "no issue" with the video listing, he posted the entire episode on X for his listeners, writing: "Since there's an issue with searching for this episode on YouTube here is the full podcast with Trump
So some people are speculating this was done on purpose to create a story by Rogan rather than YouTube .

This is *also* entirely plausible.

Which sort of circles back to Polymarket and the social engineering angle about them. I still think there is a ton of results being omitted by YouTube algorithms which is proven when you know certain videos exist and you go to search for them and yet the results are often unrelated and no longer do we have pages and pages of results, at least on mobile you'll have 5 or 6 videos and then it will say "no more results". This could be an issue with the mobile platform or maybe even the server power required to use these services is being diverted to Gemini to compete in the AI market. That's total speculation I have no clue. But the point is, there has been a "closing off" of information on the Internet.

Even if this case was manufactured (which is also a problem) it is effective because public sentiment is prone to think it's plausible. You could say, "oh those people are just stupid" but I think that's pretty dismissive
 
YouTube itself has a whole different set of problems with search that have been known for a while now.
It's important to differentiate between Google and YouTube even though they are under the same ownership umbrella.
I think it's a problem primarily because they are used so predominantly by the masses.
It's like how Microshaft got too big and was forced to split. Still too big.
People need more choice in how they find content online.
But I think you've already gotten on that train long ago.

All the {negative} stuff that's been happening with Alphabet in recent years is creating an opening for competition which is good.
But who knows how it'll ultimately pan out.
The way we search is going to vastly change in the coming years as well which creates openings.
 
My pet theory is that it has more to do with people's profiles that Google has built for the end user,
and their poor attempts at serving people what they want
This is absolutely the case, as evidenced by the results of discovery as part of European GDPR lawsuits.

Keep your pet, but your theory is documented fact.

edit: I could also find it without difficulty back when it popped, yesterday, and just now.

Cheers,
Ian
 
This is absolutely the case, as evidenced by the results of discovery as part of European GDPR lawsuits.

Keep your pet, but your theory is documented fact.

edit: I could also find it without difficulty back when it popped, yesterday, and just now.

Cheers,
Ian

Lol thanks, I was attempting to word it softly so it might be absorbed better.
But yeah, it's for sure a big component here.
 
The censorship is most definitely occurring. Big names like Rogan and Trump will get issues resolved quickly because of the negative attention it draws to the platform but there are loads of others that don't have the ability to apply that pressure.

I've heard MANY content creators communicate on their videos about shadow bans and subscribers not receiving newly released content. They've also communicated how their metrics drop to near zero if they say certain words (i.e. Covid, and many more).

This is troubling to say the least, and I know people are aware of it, but there isn't a simple solution to resolving the problem. The DOJ could file anti-trust charges and force YouTube to split but the power of these companies are tied to power in Washington which protect their behavior [as long as it serves their agenda]. Another option would be to completely boycott the platform but that would require a well organized global initiative using grassroots methods. Or, a reference point could be created for all content, where censorship is not possible - this would give control to the content owners and media companies would be left to serve content as a service. I can think of several ways to disrupt censorship, but I suspect they would all be in vain without the support of the power and class structures in the United States.
 
The censorship is most definitely occurring.
Source? Proof?
This is troubling to say the least, and I know people are aware of it, but there isn't a simple solution to resolving the problem.
Why is there a problem with a private company doing what it wishes given our market and laws?
Another option would be to completely boycott the platform but that would require a well organized global initiative using grassroots methods.
Yes, and I like this. I nuked my Twitter account, and a month later, Elon took the helm. Bullet dodged.

No FB. No more Tumblr. No Snap. Rare Pinterest.

No voting on Insta, but bicycles, coffee, photography, houses, and zero political.

Reddit whore. YouTube slave.

Cheers,
Ian
 
Back
Top