She is a INFJ in a nutshell, and I'm completely sure about her. Stll, she was a very insecure person, as far as I understood from stories about her.She is absolutely fascinating. What type do you think she is? What do you think of her persona? How would you characterize her as personality?
[video=youtube;L05TYBXwU3A]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L05TYBXwU3A[/video]
Just very smart, very very smart eyes, contemplative and very Ni. Its like she can see trough objects, transcend them.What do you think of her persona? How would you characterize her as personality?
.
She also has that delicate and fragile condition specific to many INFJ women. Very feminine.
But all people are very fragile inside Don't worry about that. Is just that some people are very careful to hide this fragility and vulnerability from the world, you know, growing a thick skin.This is off topic, but I'm curious to know more about this! Perhaps you could explain in another thread more about this! It would be insightful to me.....I feel that I'm very fragile once you get through my hard shell!
Most likely an ENFP - she had a split personality though; bordering on bipolar disorder due to intense trauma and sexual abuse she experienced while young. Her Hollywood persona was created partly by her and partly by the movie studio managers. She is definitely an empath - her ability to be very vulnerable and exude sensuality. Her life is tragic because she lived two lives consisting of two personalities that did not match each other; making her prone to hurting herself and susceptible to drugs and dissociative tendencies and the pressures of fame and scandal probably did not help.
Yep, I feel now that I owe some explanations for the fragility description ...this is foe [MENTION=10252]say what[/MENTION] tooYeah, I was about to say to @LucyJr 's comment about fragility that I doubt it's related to type, and reflects the abuse she experienced. She just wasn't able to hide that fragility as others are able to do. I think NFs have a tougher time hiding their feelings than NTs. I think she was a tougher person that anyone gave her credit for especially since everyone had all these assumptions and expectations about who she was and should be.
She is a INFJ in a nutshell, and I'm completely sure about her. Stll, she was a very insecure person, as far as I understood from stories about her.
Just very smart, very very smart eyes, contemplative and very Ni. Its like she can see trough objects, transcend them.
She also has that delicate and fragile condition specific to many INFJ women. Very feminine.
I just have a difficult time believing that Marilyn Monroe was INFJ. I thought INFJs are supposed to have strong ethics and a need to help others? I see nothing in her biography to show those traits at all. She seemed to have a life centred on self-promotion and stardom. That doesn't sound very INFJ to me. I'm not knocking her and I'm not questioning that she was probably smart (although I don't quite see it the way you do in the interview you posted) but I can't see her lifestyle as something that would appeal to an INFJ.
I mostly identify people by their eyes in terms of their facial expressions, and the manner of adressing a subject. Also body language, energy, but mostly eyes. INFJ eyes are very easily distinguished. Is that soft yet strong Ni stare. But like you said, I could be wrong.
As for her lifestyle, I don't know...what about Hitler? He certainly was a INFJ, yet that doesn mean he was the stereotypical INFJ. I think people have their values shaped by life experiences and beliefs, so that could explain alot of things. Also INFJs can be 4w3...which menas exactly that they will seek authenticity and fame, social position and so on.
Just as a side note, if the actresses today would be half decent and polite like Marilyn ( and smart), I could much more easily support stardom those days. But it seems to me that most of the actors today are talent-less, yet really proud of their "glamour".
I am not sure it's fair to evaluate her as not INFJ because she was not as humanistic as INFJs are supposed to be. We don't know her personally to make those judgments. She was definitely someone whose persona made it difficult to really know what she felt or thought because people had so many assumptions or presumptions and were not that interested in seeing anything else than what they felt was true. In the one interview with that couple, she was being asked if she cleaned her own room. It's like the interview felt she needed to be held accountable like a child. That's ridiculous, patronizing and patriarchal. The implication is that she too much of an "dumb blonde" to know how to take care of herself. I doubt many people cared what she thought. As long as they could make money from her image, they really couldn't care less. I am sure if she said anything that was supposedly more intelligent than she seemed capable of, they would have thought it was a fluke.