Merkabah

[Skarekrow]

What a great quote.

 

[Skarekrow]

The Nonlocal, Entangled, Conscious Universe - Menas Kafatos

[video=youtube_share;fRNcTr_KnZY]http://youtu.be/fRNcTr_KnZY[/video]

The Nonlocal, Entangled, Conscious Universe:
From the Spookiness of Limited Mind to the Undivided Wholeness of Reality,
Menas Kafatos, Ph.D.,
Fletcher Jones Endowed Professor of Computational Physics,
Chapman University

Quantum mechanics brought in the role of observation in a primary way, and the participatory universe of John A. Wheeler is a natural consequence of measurement theory in standard John von Neumann quantum view established more than 80 years ago.

Recently, entanglement has been demonstrated in macroscopic diamond crystals, implying that non-trivial quantum e ects are not con ned to the microscopic realm.

Quantum theory in its foundations implies a primary role for the mind and interactions of observers with objects under observation.
Yet, despite these profound experimental results confirming quantum physics, neuroscience assigns mental activity to physical process and seeks explanations in neuronal connections and processes with no obvious role for the observer or agency implied by quantum physics.

Although advancing our knowledge of correlates of conscious experience and yielding great medical advances, brain science through its fundamental physicalist assumptions has yielded little in the actual understanding of experience and mind.

e emerging view proposed here is that entanglement, nonlocality and coherent structures are all manifestations of the universe which is basically living and conscious.
Consciousness manifesting as awareness, of objects and the observing agent, is primary, rather than derived through blind processes as current materialist approaches claim.

Entanglement is not a peculiarity of quantum mechanical phenomena at microscopic scales. It is instead the natural feature of the primacy of consciousness, operating through three fundamental principles of complementarity; creative interactivity and sentience; and recursion.

The main issue is not how such the universe is nonlocal and entangled but rather how it appears as made of distinct, physical objects.
What is proposed is that the mind creates a veiling of undivided wholeness.

It is both the new and also ancient vision of non-duality, which we should pass on to the next generations.​

I’m quoting myself here because this is a captivating speech.
We are all one mind…pretty cool stuff.

 

[Skarekrow]

We Create Our Reality -
Hacking Consciousness at Stanford University


[video=youtube_share;UlxGBZifk6k]http://youtu.be/UlxGBZifk6k[/video]

Frederick Travis, PhD, director of the Center for Brain, Consciousness and Cognition, explains that the concept "We create our reality" is more than a philosophical statement. It is a physical reality driven by neural plasticity–every experience changes the brain.
Therefore, choose transcendental experiences and higher states of consciousness naturally unfold.​

 

[Skarekrow]

Hope everyone is well and feels love from someone today.

Beyond Our Sight -
Documentary

[video=youtube_share;xpSuO8DtiMM]http://youtu.be/xpSuO8DtiMM[/video]

Can we survive death?
What is the nature of our consciousness?
“Beyond Our Sight” is an independant documentary that talks about near-death experiences, human consciousness, and the possibility of communication with other dimensions.​

 

[Skarekrow]

What is it that keeps you from being all that you can be?
Why do we tolerate it?

 

[Skarekrow]

I don’t usually post about UFOs and crop circles…I think the majority (if not all) of them are man-made…just though this one was huge and awesome!

13 Mile Long Crop Circle-like Formation Found In Oregon

http://earthweareone.com/13-mile-long-crop-circle-like-formation-found-in-oregon/​

 

[Skarekrow]

Roger Penrose:
The Emperor's New Mind,
Quantum Mind,
Quantum Consciousness,
The Laws of Physics



[video=youtube_share;eVq39QbFQXE]http://youtu.be/eVq39QbFQXE[/video]​

Sir Roger Penrose is an English mathematical physicist, mathematician and philosopher of science.
He is the Emeritus Rouse Ball Professor of Mathematics at the Mathematical Institute of the University of Oxford, as well as an Emeritus Fellow of Wadham College.

Penrose is known for his work in mathematical physics, in particular for his contributions to general relativity and cosmology.
He has received a number of prizes and awards, including the 1988 Wolf Prize for physics, which he shared with Stephen Hawking for their contribution to our understanding of the universe.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Pe...

The Emperor's New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds and The Laws of Physics is a 1989 book by mathematical physicist Sir Roger Penrose.
Penrose presents the argument that human consciousness is non-algorithmic, and thus is not capable of being modeled by a conventional Turing machine-type of digital computer.

Penrose hypothesizes that quantum mechanics plays an essential role in the understanding of human consciousness.
The collapse of the quantum wavefunction is seen as playing an important role in brain function.

The majority of the book is spent reviewing, for the scientifically minded layreader, a plethora of interrelated subjects such as Newtonian physics, special and general relativity, the philosophy and limitations of mathematics, quantum physics, cosmology, and the nature of time.

Penrose intermittently describes how each of these bears on his developing theme: that consciousness is not "algorithmic".
Only the later portions of the book address the thesis directly.

Penrose states that his ideas on the nature of consciousness are speculative, and his thesis is considered erroneous by experts in the fields of philosophy, computer science, and robotics.

Following the publication of this book, Penrose began to collaborate with Stuart Hameroff on a biological analog to quantum computation involving microtubules, which became the foundation for his subsequent book, Shadows of the Mind: A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Empe...

Orchestrated objective reduction (Orch-OR) is a controversial 20-year-old theory of consciousness conceptualized by the theoretical physicist Sir Roger Penrose and anesthesiologist Stuart Hameroff, which claims that consciousness derives from deeper level, finer scale quantum activities inside the cells, most prevalent in the brain's neurons.

It combines approaches from the radically different angles of molecular biology, neuroscience, quantum physics, pharmacology, philosophy, quantum information theory, and aspects of quantum gravity.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orchestr...
http://www.quantumconsciousness.org/p...

The quantum mind or quantum consciousness hypothesis proposes that classical mechanics cannot explain consciousness, while quantum mechanical phenomena, such as quantum entanglement and superposition, may play an important part in the brain's function, and could form the basis of an explanation of consciousness.

It is not one theory, but a collection of distinct ideas described below.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_...

 

[Skarekrow]

Patient NDEs in the ICU.
Laurin Bellg, critical care physician,
at TMI Professional Seminar 2014


[video=youtube_share;xdScjvc14xE]http://youtu.be/xdScjvc14xE[/video]​

What relevance do near-death experiences in ICU patients have for the experiencer and their health care provider?
What impact, if any, does a regular use of Hemi-Sync have on those same providers?

Is it possible that a new way of thinking about phenomena of consciousness, long reported but often discarded as hallucination by the medical professional community, could help heal and transform patients when their "strange experiences" are held with respect instead of being told they didn't happen?

Through several anecdotal accounts of real patient experiences recounted to her over the past two decades, as well as her own personal observations of how Hemi-Sync enhanced the traditional medical skills available to her, Laurin Bellg, MD, Critical Care Specialist, explores a potential new landscape of patient care that she believes could transform how we interact with patients who've had not only near-death but also out-of-body experiences around trauma and severe illness.

At the end of her presentation Dr. Bellg includes the trailer of an educational DVD prepared for health care providers by Blue Marble Films in collaboration with the International Association for Near-Death Studies (IANDS). This film is intended to educate health professionals about how to talk with patients about their near-death experiences -- even if they don't believe in them themselves!
_____________________________________________

Laurin Bellg, MD, is a critical care specialist working in two intensive care units at Appleton Medical Center and Theda Clark Medical Center in Appleton, Wisconsin. After obtaining her medical degree at the University of Tennessee, she completed an internal medicine residency at the Medical College of Wisconsin before moving to Chicago to receive her fellowship training in critical care at Rush Medical Center. As a critical care physician working in the intensive care unit, Dr Bellg's nearly twenty-year professional life of being present at the bedside of patients near death has brought her face-to-face with a variety of phenomena of consciousness. She has written various articles and stories about these experiences.

Her most recent collaboration was with John Kortum, past residential facilitator at The Monroe Institute and author of The Kortum Technique, to produce a documentary video on the presence and application of intuition in medicine. She has also worked with the International Association for Near-Death Studies (IANDS) and Blue Marble Films to create an educational video for health care providers on how to talk with patients about their experiences.

Her involvement with The Monroe Institute includes training as an Outreach Facilitator and involvement in the Local Chapter Network of TMI, where she serves on the Leadership Council.

 

[Skarekrow]

Just when they thought they knew what was going on….hahaha.

Scientists discover black hole so big it contradicts growth theory

SYDNEY (Reuters) - Scientists say they have discovered a black hole so big that it challenges the theory about how they grow.
Scientists said this black hole was formed about 900 million years after the Big Bang.

But with measurements indicating it is 12 billion times the size of the Sun, the black hole challenges a widely accepted hypothesis of growth rates.
"Based on previous research, this is the largest black hole found for that period of time," Dr Fuyan Bian, Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Australian National University (ANU), told Reuters on Wednesday.

"Current theory is for a limit to how fast a black hole can grow, but this black hole is too large for that theory."
The creation of supermassive black holes remains an open topic of research. However, many scientists have long believed the growth rate of black holes was limited.

Black holes grow, scientific theory suggests, as they absorb mass. However, as mass is absorbed, it will be heated creating radiation pressure, which pushes the mass away from the black hole.

"Basically, you have two forces balanced together which sets up a limit for growth, which is much smaller than what we found," said Bian.
The black hole was discovered a team of global scientists led by Xue-Bing Wu at Peking University, China, as part of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, which provided imagery data of 35 percent of the northern hemisphere sky.

The ANU is leading a comparable project, known as SkyMapper, to carry out observations of the Southern Hemisphere sky.
Bian expects more black holes to be observed as the project advances.

 

[Skarekrow]

Didn’t even know this was out there...

[video=youtube;lRaqYClJ154]https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=lRaqYClJ154[/video]

 

[Skarekrow]

Panel: Quantum Theory and Free Will -
Chris Fields, Henry Stapp & Donald Hoffman

[video=youtube_share;v73S4BkItrc]http://youtu.be/v73S4BkItrc[/video]​

Quantum theory incorporates two seemingly-contradictory ideas about free will.
On the one hand, an observer can choose both the system to measure and the kind of measurement to make; given these choices, the theory predicts a probability distribution over the possible outcomes and nothing more.

is is "quantum indeterminism."
On the other hand, a system that no one is looking at evolves through time according the dynamics that are perfectly deterministic.

No one is "looking at" the universe as a whole - all observers are inside the universe by definition - so the time evolution of the whole universe must be perfectly deterministic.

This clash between indeterminism and determinism is sharpened by the existence of a strong theorem, the Conway-Kochen "free will theorem," that says that if human (or any other kind of) observers are assumed to have free will, everything else in the universe, even electrons, has to be assumed to have free will, too.

Is this conflict real, or might it dissolve on further analysis?
This panel will examine some of the strikingly different views advanced by physicists on this question, illuminating the concept and role of entanglement in the process."

Dr. Chris Fields is an independent scientist interested in both the physics and the cognitive neuroscience underlying the human perception of objects as spatially and temporally bounded entities. His particular interests include quantum information theory and quantum computing on the one hand, and creative problem solving, early childhood development and autism-spectrum conditions on the other. His recent papers have appeared in the International Journal of Theoretical Physics, Information, International Journal of General Systems, Advances in Cognitive Psychology, Frontiers in Perception Science and Medical Hypotheses among others. He is currently editing a Research Topic titled “How humans recognize objects: Segmentation, categorization and individual identification” for Frontiers in Perception Science.

Donald Hoffman is a cognitive scientist and author of more than 90 scientific papers and three books, including Visual Intelligence: How We Create What We See (W.W. Norton, 2000). He received his BA from UCLA in Quantitative Psychology and his Ph.D. from MIT in Computational Psychology. He joined the faculty of UC Irvine in 1983, where he is now a full professor in the departments of cognitive science, computer science and philosophy. He received a Distinguished Scientific Award of the American Psychological Association for early career research into visual perception, and the Troland Research Award of the US National Academy of Sciences for his research on the relationship of consciousness and the physical world.

Henry Stapp received his Ph.D. in particle physics at the University of California, Berkeley, under the supervision of Nobel Laureates Emilio Segrè and Owen Chamberlain. Wolfgang Pauli visited Berkeley in the spring of 1958. He talked extensively with Stapp, and invited him to work with him in Zurich in the Fall. Stapp worked in Zurich with Pauli on fundamental problems until Pauli sudden unexpected death in December. In 1970 Werner Heisenberg invited Stapp to Munich, where the two conversed often on fundamental issues surrounding quantum mechanics. After returning to Berkeley wrote an influential article The Copenhagen Interpretation, published in the American Journal of Physics with Heisenberg’s comments appearing in an Appendix. Stapp has has made major contributions to analytic S-matrix theory, generalizations of Bell’s theorems, and understanding the quantum connection of mind to physical processes.

 

[Skarekrow]

Human Head Transplants Could Become A Reality By 2017

http://www.iflscience.com/health-and-medicine/human-head-transplants-could-become-reality-2017​

 

[Kgal]

Best parable ever - don't you think? It sums up Truth in one short tale.

Feed the Love within us....feed the LOVE within us....Our inner self is starved for love from us. Feed it.... it's just that simple. :love:

 

[Kgal]

As I said before, the universe is one big cloud of stuff. This is not a metaphor.

Agreed....

 

[Kgal]

Here is your video for the weekend…I always like listening to Rupert Sheldrake talk…he would fascinating to just sit and talk with.
Enjoy…this is a good one too!

Rupert Sheldrake:
the Evolution of Telepathy

[video=youtube_share;2MOzlSF0a8M]http://youtu.be/2MOzlSF0a8M[/video]


The Perrott-Warrick Lecture by Dr. Rupert Sheldrake (February 9th. 2011), in which were described phenomena indicative of the existence of telepathy in both animals and human beings.

Abstract: Field observations have suggested that wolves and other wild animals may communicate telepathically over many miles, and surveys have shown that about 50% of dog owners and about 30% of cat owners believe that their pets may respond to their thoughts or silent commands.

Among humans, apparent telepathy is most commonly reported between members of families and between close friends and colleagues.
Experimental investigations of telepathy in animals and people suggest that telepathy may be a natural means of communication between members of animal and human groups.

Human telepathy is still evolving in the context of modern technologies, including the internet, emails, SMS messages and telephones.
Dr. Sheldrake will show how anyone can explore their own abilities in automated telepathy tests using mobile phones.​

[MENTION=4108]Radiant Shadow[/MENTION] Have you seen this research on how pets know when their owners are coming home?

 

[Skarekrow]

This is an incredibly sad article, I won’t lie. But it’s been almost 6 years in a week or two since my own Dad passed from esophageal cancer that had already metastasized to the rest of his body. He grew brain tumors from it and we actually only found out when he had a seizure. The Doctors suggested that he get radiation and chemo to try and shrink the tumor in his esophagus so he could eat easier. It is my strong belief that he would have live longer and happier without either of those things…they made him SO sick and thin, that he passed sooner than I believe he could have. This is NOT a perfect science dispute what any Oncologist will tell you. Love those you are with now…just the day before the seizure my Dad was driving all day from some work thing…he could have just as easily had the seizure then and that would have been that. No Goodbye. So I will always feel lucky for the time I spent with him.

As I lay dying

​

I am dying, literally, at my home in Hollywood, of metastatic breast cancer, the only kind of breast cancer that kills.
For six years I've known I was going to die.
I just didn't know when.

Then, a couple of weeks before Christmas, a new, deadly diagnosis gave me a deadline.
No doctor would promise me I'd make it to 2015.

Promise me, I told my friends and family, that you'll never say that I died after “fighting a courageous battle with breast cancer.”
This tired, trite line dishonors the dead and the dying by suggesting that we, the victims, are responsible for our deaths or that the fight we were in was ever fair.

Laurie Becklund: 'Treat me like a statistic and save my life.'​

Promise me you'll never wear a pink ribbon in my name or drop a dollar into a bucket that goes to breast cancer “awareness” for “early detection for a cure,” the mantra of fund-raising juggernaut Susan G. Komen, which has propagated a distorted message about breast cancer and how to “cure” it.

I'm proof that early detection doesn't cure cancer.
I had more than 20 mammograms, and none of them caught my disease.

In fact, we now have significant studies showing that routine mammogram screening, which may result in misdiagnoses, unnecessary treatment and radiation overexposure, can harm more people than it helps.

In 1996, during a self-exam, I found a peanut-sized lump in one breast that turned out to be stage one breast cancer.
I had the “best,” most common, kind of breast cancer, found it early, got a lumpectomy and short dose of radiation.

Five years out, my doctor told me there was little chance of recurrence and said, “Have a great life!”
You can imagine my shock when, 13 years after my initial diagnosis, I was in gridlock on the Harbor Freeway and got a call from my doctor with the results of a PET scan ordered after routine blood labs. “Maybe you should pull over,” he said.

Half an hour later, in an elementary school parking lot, I learned the scans revealed stage four breast cancer in my bones, liver, lungs and brain: a death sentence with an average life expectancy of three years.

I demanded the truth, always, from my doctors.
I was a reporter who needed facts to plan whatever life I had left.

I would not live in denial.
But I was too scared, too private to tell anyone except my husband, my daughter and three friends.
My very cells suddenly became my most intimate secrets.

Who would ever sign another book contract with a dying woman?
Or remember Laurie Becklund, valedictorian, Fulbright scholar, former Times staff writer who exposed the Salvadoran death squads and helped The Times win a Pulitzer Prize for coverage of the 1992 L.A. riots?

More important, and more honest, who would ever again look at me just as Laurie?
-
It took me more than two years to summon the courage to meet others like me, at a Metastatic Breast Cancer Network conference.
When I arrived there were no pink ribbons in sight, except for a single lapel pin that had been turned upside down like a noose.

I introduced myself to the group's president and vice president, who were comparing their hands, red and shiny from the side effects of various chemo treatments.

Metaphorically, I had been both hiding my identity and fearing I'd lose it.
It wasn't until that day that I learned some people literally lose theirs, via their fingerprints.

The women at the conference greeted me with questions.
They were shocked to meet someone whose cancer had metastasized to all four possible sites breast cancer can go.

How was I even alive?
They had set up lunch tables labeled “Brain,” “Bones,” “Lungs” and “Liver.”
I told myself, at least I could table-hop.

Later that day, in one of the most powerful rituals I have ever seen, the group's president asked all of us to stand, then sit back down when she reached the number of years since our diagnosis.

At two years, most had to sit down. When she reached seven, no one I could see was still standing.
Looking back, I realize that I've been trying to report my way out of this disease.

I've read so many books; researched hundreds of clinical trials; done my best to learn the complicated language of cancer and microbiology; attended conferences in Indiana, Florida, Mexico and Portugal.

I joined online forums. I signed on with the user name “WontDieofIgnorance.”
Despite it all, I fear that is exactly what is going to happen.
I might as well have been playing Chutes and Ladders, a childhood board game whose outcome is based on rolls of the dice.

Another quarter-million Americans are estimated to be waiting in the wings.
I say “estimated” because no one is required to report a metastatic diagnosis.

Death certificates normally report symptoms such as “respiratory failure,” not the actual disease.
We are literally uncounted.

The medical establishment tells me I have “failed” a number of therapies.
That's not right: The establishment and its therapies have failed me.

The system we live in as metastatic breast cancer patients is simply not designed to deal with the cycle we are living and dying in.
The estimated 40,000 women (and a few men) who die annually can't wait years for FDA-approved, “gold standard” clinical trials.
We're dying now.

We now know that breast cancer is not one disease.
What works for one person might not for another: There is no one “cure.”

We are each, in effect, one-person clinical trials.
Yet the knowledge generated from those trials will die with us because there is no comprehensive database of metastatic breast cancer patients, their characteristics and what treatments did and didn't help them.

In the Big Data-era, this void is criminal.
Consider what Wall Street does.

Even the tiniest companies can see how much stock they sell, compare themselves to cohorts, review history, predict trends.
Why can't we create such a database for cancer patients, so we can all learn from patient experiences and make more educated decisions on what treatments will extend and improve lives?

The most powerful organization in the breast cancer universe, Susan G. Komen , has raised $2.5 billion over the last 20 years, much more than many corporations will ever earn.

Yet Komen channels only a fraction of those funds into research or systems to help those who are already seriously sick.
Most of that money continues to go to a breast cancer “awareness” campaign that is now painfully out of date.

We need people – patients, doctors, scientists, politicians, investors, families – to make a fresh start.
We must create a new system of data collection and an open, online, broad-range database about patient histories that will provide information invaluable to those who've been given a death sentence.

Patients as well as doctors must contribute.

It will come too late for me.
But it is possible to end the game: Patients shouldn't have to climb up ladders and fall down chutes.

Laurie Becklund, a former Times staff writer, died Feb. 8.
She wrote this over the last few months.

 

[Kgal]

I work with so many people who promote this breast cancer awareness get your boobs checked every year nonsense. Chemo kills. Radiation kills. I know for a fact the doctors will push both treatments because they're covered by insurance even though the patient has only 6 months to live. It happened with my beloved B when he was diagnosed with colon cancer.

I feel for those who are still hanging on the idea that the medical industry has actual healing on their minds. It's all lies....and when those people finally get it through their closed minds what they've been peddling and promoting for all these years was actually an attempt to kill off the population - their hearts are going to break. No wonder heart attacks amongst women are on the rise. I think they intuitively know.... I know I did....because I stopped doing the annual pap and mammogram nonsense 7 or 8 years ago by reasoning and logic alone. People are sooooo conditioned. The last time I was in one of these rural health clinics I got into an arguement with a nurse over when the last time I had a mammogram. I was in there for something completely different and I told her I don't remember...maybe in 2009? She started that clicking her tongue thing and attempted to shame me in to going for one. I told her no...and she got mad at me. "Mad at me"!!!! Can you believe that??? THEY think we're all stupid....and the majority ARE.

So no. Your article does not make me sad....it makes me MAD at their audacity to wilfully kill us in horrible ways. Bah...makes me want to post this article every where....!!!!

 

[Skarekrow]

I work with so many people who promote this breast cancer awareness get your boobs checked every year nonsense. Chemo kills. Radiation kills. I know for a fact the doctors will push both treatments because they're covered by insurance even though the patient has only 6 months to live. It happened with my beloved B when he was diagnosed with colon cancer.

I feel for those who are still hanging on the idea that the medical industry has actual healing on their minds. It's all lies....and when those people finally get it through their closed minds what they've been peddling and promoting for all these years was actually an attempt to kill off the population - their hearts are going to break. No wonder heart attacks amongst women are on the rise. I think they intuitively know.... I know I did....because I stopped doing the annual pap and mammogram nonsense 7 or 8 years ago by reasoning and logic alone. People are sooooo conditioned. The last time I was in one of these rural health clinics I got into an arguement with a nurse over when the last time I had a mammogram. I was in there for something completely different and I told her I don't remember...maybe in 2009? She started that clicking her tongue thing and attempted to shame me in to going for one. I told her no...and she got mad at me. "Mad at me"!!!! Can you believe that??? THEY think we're all stupid....and the majority ARE.

So no. Your article does not make me sad....it makes me MAD at their audacity to wilfully kill us in horrible ways. Bah...makes me want to post this article every where....!!!!

If you wish to post it here is the link - http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-becklund-breast-cancer-komen-20150222-story.html#page=1

My Dad was with us for around 5 months since the discovery.
But my Dad also smoked since the early 70’s….he quit for a while, but I think he still did at work haha…whatever, he actually had quit with Chantix a few months before and when he found out he went and bought a pack…lololololol.
I love my Dad…even though he was forced to do and see some terrible shit in Vietnam…he rarely if ever spoke of it…that was his trial….he was a solid provider and a very centered person even though he would have called that a bunch of nonsense.
He liked to cook, and would sing or hum when he did so. As I got older, he always kept some dark beers in the little wine fridge even though he hated them because he knew I liked them.
Once in a while I can hear his voice so clearly…he was very black and white…I always know what he would have said about this or that.
He always teased us kids…he liked to joke, but could be very stern too.
He never lost his sense of humor even as he was on his death bed…he would try to tease us but it didn’t make sense all the way…still, it was funny to just see him try it and then smile and laugh.
He had to go into get a G-tube PEG tube put in (though I don’t know why) anyhow….they held my now weak Father down and put it in him with no sedation or anesthetic…I almost went and did a bad thing to that Doctor that night…real close.
He got away with it too…I have let it go, but it still amazes me the audacity and lack of human compassion.
Our health care is terrible….people ARE misinformed…check this out - http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/p...t-the-doctor-in-america-you-might-get-cancer/

Makes me sick in other ways….I seriously get sick when I hear or pull into myself the pain of others…I know that there have been several occasions during surgery that (and I can’t back up this claim…except maybe an eyewitness account) I have told the Surgeon to stop or not cut there, or actually knocked their instruments with mine out of the way. These usually spared the aorta being punctured or similar type things…I had knowledge of anatomy but this was different.

 

[Skarekrow]

Some incredible facts -

*sigh*

 

[Skarekrow]

More...