@
Skarekrow
It's interesting. Certainly well documented and put together. The article that was linked was quite extensive and you could tell they really took it seriously. That they approached it from a scientific standpoint. I also appreciate that they don't just shrug off the skeptics point of view and that they understand how all this can sound to someone who doesn't share their point of view. I think it's certainly a good start for measuring such phenomenon and that it's more likely to be taken seriously by the broader scientific community. It wasn't that long ago that atoms were seen as a fantasy by scientists, and so it's possible that one day this will be seen as the beginning of a new type of science.
All that said, I'm still a bit skeptical of their findings. As they mention in the article, NDEs and OBEs are very difficult to reliably measure. It relies a lot on the subjective viewpoints of the people who experienced them. And the people who are willing to talk about their experiences may be motivated to exaggerate their value. I don't think they're consciously trying to deceive, but they may want to believe there's more behind their experiences than there is. And the writer of the article getting butthurt because his claims are criticized won't change that.
Maybe my stance will change if there's more research and lab based experimentation gone into it, but for now I still maintain a skeptical attitude.