Critical thinking is fun. I am more interested in abstract truth than practical. But sometimes my imaginary path crosses that of reality.
Take a look at this:
How Did The Asteroid Belt Form? Was There A Planet There?
[...]
Gravity is the support structure for the formation of celestial bodies. Gravity pulls material together so it can form stars, moons, planets, galaxies… Too little or too much and they won’t form; and that area between Mars and Jupiter is the latter. Too much gravitational interference caused it to become a bunch of rocks instead of a pretty little planet. Physics dictates how far away those bodies have to be from each other to maintain stable orbits.
This was discovered in the late 18th century by J.E. Bode, and is called the
Titus-Bode Law. Essentially, each planet’s orbital period, is equal to the period of the sun’s rotation and distance of the furthest reaches of their orbit.
According to this mathematical equation, there SHOULD be a planet in between Mars and Jupiter, and a planet TRIED to form but Jupiter’s massive gravity tore it asunder. It just couldn’t do it. Of course, we know that NOW, but from the 18th and into the 19th century, people believed they simply hadn’t spotted the elusive planet yet.
And then in 1801, Giuseppe Piazzi discovered Ceres! He believed Ceres might be a comet, but it didn’t have a ‘coma’ the gas and dust that surrounds a comet. A bit over a year later, a German named Heinrich Olbers discovered another small object on the same orbit he called 2 Pallas.
Eventually, as more of these were discovered astronomers knew there was no planet in this fifth orbit, but instead… what they called asteroids. Despite what conspiracy theorists may say on the internet; these billions of little asteroids never formed into a planet.
Instead, the gravitational forces of our solar system kept it as bit of rock and dust. But, since Shawn Pitts wanted to know how large a PLANET would be if it DID happen to form, I figured we could give a guess.
Today, Ceres, comprises one-third of the mass of the whole asteroid belt. If you were to glomp the mass of the whole belt onto Ceres, you’d STILL have less mass than our moon does — Our moon would still be 26-times more massive than this super-Ceres. More like super tiny.
http://www.cosmosup.com/how-did-the-asteroid-belt-form/
This assumes that planetary bodies are solid. But according to Hollow Earth theory, the Earth (and other planets) are hollow. Well, the System keeps the lid on the flask to prevent the genie from appearing, using BS to suppress alternative theories. So, we do cannot explore these theories. Channeled sources say that there was a planet called Electra (a dozen other names exist) that was bigger than the Earth once upon a time. According to David Wilcock, it exploded a half million years ago in a galactic war. If Electra exploded, its mass volume was smaller than its spherical volume, because it was hollow. That explains why there total volume of the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter is so small, and DW's ramblings explain why the asteroid belt exists.
Basically, the Hollow Earth theory is not provable as the theory stands now because nobody has been there (Corey Goode and some other guy are individual witnesses who claim to have been in Hollow Earth, so it is up to each one to explore what you believe). On the other hand, modern science is wrong to claim that all planetary are solid without evidence. No one has drilled through the crust of the Earth yet. It is only an assumption.
No theory is completely satisfactory.
'Jeez!' Why did nobody spot that error before? I am such a 'genius'. I want to go back to my imaginary world now, never to return.
