Apparently the phenomenon of narcissism is in no way specific to INFJs...
"Bolognese can be prone to small dog syndrome, human induced behaviors where the dog believes he is pack leader to humans. This can cause behavior programs including separation anxiety and timidity."
View attachment 18205
Who's timid and feels seperate?
If you're directing that at me I personally would describe myself as a pretty confident person who feels a good connection with a good many people
I was talking about some of the famous and influential INFJ's eg Ghandi. He was a courageous guy who stood up against the arch manipulators....do you think he was 'timid'? Millions stood by him....do you think he was 'seperate' or do you think the arch manipulators sitting in their smoky gentlemans clubs scheming against humanity are the ones who are really seperate?
Sure i think young INFJ's go through a period where they have to adjust to being in a minority group in terms of how they process information but as they develop they begin to stand more on their own two feet just like any other type as it matures; they become more cogniscent of their own strengths and weaknesses and of the strengths and weaknesses of others and as a result become more accepting of the differences through a conscious awareness of how different people can all bring something useful to a situation
What the implication is with words such as 'narcissism' and 'sociopathy' is some pretty disturbed states of being that lead to disfunction in a persons life which will affect either their life detrimentally or the lives of others detrimentally or both
We're not talking about a little self love here or annoyance towards others, we are talking about severe pathological conditions; these terms shouldn't be used lightly although i'm sure big pharma would like to see them used lightly so that their DSM clutching minions can chemically cosh more people with the psychotropic drugs that big pharma keep making astronomic profits from
Our world most certainly is being shaped by people with pathological conditions into what is often a harsh place
If you want some proof of this i'd refer you to the book below which explains how a group of people are basically acting as agents of chaos in human affairs by creating and fuelling violence and fear; these people have an agenda to create an order that is favourable to them through chaos and they believe that the end always justifies the means even if the means is the slaughter of thousands of innocents:
''
Big Oil & their bankers in the Persian Gulf'', by Dean Henderson, ''pulls back the covers to expose a centuries old cabal of global oligarchs whose control over the global economy is based on hegemony over the planet's three most valuable commodities: oil, guns and drugs- combined with ownership of the world's central banks''
These people are creating a world based around their ideologies (fascism and consumerism) which leave many feeling alienated because these states of being do not match what humans have evolved over 200,000 years to be. This leaves many feeling alienated and insecure which is a mental state that is the very cornerstone of the ideology of 'consumer-ism'. If a person is secure they don't need to keep consuming as much eg i like my car and i don't need to upgrade it to keep my status anxiety in check because my neighbour has just bought a newer model because i'm inner directed and couldn't care less about an item that is essentially just a tool and i don't need to place my sense of value in an object
Making people feel isolated and insecure is also a great way to induce anxiety which if it goes further becomes mania which means that the DSM clutching minions can then prescribe more of big pharmas drugs $$$$$$cha-ching!$$$$$$cha-ching!$$$$$$cha-ching!$$$$$, not to mention the powerful role these drugs play in controlling the population and keeping them as the slaves of the arch manipulators
I have debated with many people now irl and online and i have noticed that the INFJ's consistently line up on one side in the corporations v's the people debates. There are other types (which i won't mention) which often line up on the other side of the debates
This is why i think when you want to point the finger at which types are more prone to certain behaviours when becoming pathological i think that the INFJ is not really the type most worthy of your demonisation