@
muir
You're jumbling quotes from the 19th and early 20th century with quotes from the 50s as well as personal opinions and what are basically just
descriptions of situations that are still only hypothetical.
As i've already explained to you this group has been operating over several generations. Dynastys such as the Rothschilds have been immensly influential for over 200 years
Try telling any historian that quotes from historical figures are inadmissable as evidence and they will laugh you out of the room
The truth is right there staring you in the face; its not hypothetical it is documented in their own literature; if you want to check these quotes then GO DO IT!
You're still taking quotes out of context (refusing to actually provide a context for the quotes-- no time frames, no book titles, no article titles, no 'in reference to', etc.).
I did provide sources when i posted these quotes previously. You have the power of the internet at your finger tips here Apone why not type one of these quotes into a search engine and see what you find.....i'm sure thats not too taxing an exercise
You're taking quotes that basically amount to 'we're going to try our best to convince people that this is a good idea' (as if we're not currently trying to convince each other of anything) as if they're evidence of some sort of hideous evil plot to take over the world,
They are evidence of a cabal of international investors/bankers who seek to create a one world government...yes
as if these ideas received unanimous support by all politicians, as if minds were never changed or ideas abandoned, as if people would fully understand the government even if it were completely transparent, as if nobody ever misinterprets quotes because they didn't fully understand them, as if people in general aren't paranoid and mistrustful of authority no matter who or what it is.
Not all politicians support it. Even in the clip i posted above Ron paul opposes it as well as another senator. I have also posted clips of congressmean larry macDonald and other politicians speaking out against it including presidents!!
You're using the word 'secret societies' over and over because we all know that anything that is secret is always going to be dangerous and scary. My father was also a freemason-- he was actually a grand master of the lodge for a year or so. Is he part of it too??? Have you ever actually been to a lodge meeting?
Why 'secret societies' are a problem is because they are untransparent and unaccountable when we are supposed to be living in a free and open democracy
Concerning your father he might have no idea of the agenda of the cabal; it operates like this:
It is a hierarchical, male dominated pyramidal structure where people have to progress through 'degrees'. With each degree they must learn certain information and then voice their views on what it means to their fellow lodge members. This is a vetting process to decide the suitability of a candidate. The people at the top of the pyramid are the only people with the inner secrets of the order. They are the ones steering the ship and everyone else follows their directives. People in the lower degrees have no idea about the esoteric knowledge that is imparted in the higher degrees and they have no idea about the agenda of the organisation as a whole. They have to climb the ladder, proving that they are trustworthy and obedient to the will of the grandmaster
If you are a good little boy and do what you are told then you will progress. 'Obedience' was enshrined in the Templars 'rule'
So your dad might have no idea about the upper degrees for example qabalah and he might have no idea about the agenda of the organisation which is to
centralise power. He might believe the propaganda about the aim being to build your own spiritual temple, but in reality how can you build your own spiritual temple when you are following the instructions of others and aren't promoted unless you are making the right noises in the lodge meetings?
Many people join to furtehr their own business interests, but the order itself knows what its members do and if it ever needs to call on a member to use their influence in a situation it will and through that means it can make a lot of things happen unseen within the public sphere. The individualcalled on to perform a function for the order may be completely unaware of what part their individual action is playing in the wider scheme of things....they are simply pawns in the games of powerful men
The truth is that the individual practitioner operating on their own to build their own spiritual temple and a relationship with the divine is far more of a mason then any one registered in a lodge
there are two opposing forces in the world: there are those that wish to centralsie power and there are those that wish to de-centralise power. History tells us that whenever power is centralised and moved away from the individual there follows corruption and exploitation (think of all the dictators of history). These are vitally important lessons from history and we ignore them at our peril.
Freemasonry as an order is controlled centrally and wishes to further its influence....it is part of the centralisation current and your dad, whether he is conscious of this or not by paying his dues is helping to fund this process
Of course politicians are going to belong to social clubs-- networking is key in politics… basically, it's a chance to socialize with people outside of your workplace.
They do this to entrench the divison between the workers and the capitalist class
[FONT=&]We either believe that we should have a say in the running of our communities and wider countries or we believe we should give up all responsiblity to central control and just hope that they will treat us kindly (when history says they won't)
It all boils down to how transparent do we want power to be
[/FONT]
And at least one of those quotes dates back to the time when the British Empire was the dominant power in the world, and America was a brand new nation that was only beginning to dabble in Imperialism.
The cabal doesn't recognise nations. It operates across borders through secret societies, corporations and the central banking system. The European bankers behind the British empire are the same families behind American (US) imperialism
One of the quotes in the video you've quoted is actually from an American Libertarian (in the American sense of the word) whose primary fear is that his rich buddies will lose their monopoly on the world's wealth to the government. Fringe groups tend to use more flamboyant rhetoric that appeals to emotion in order to secure support and funding-- mostly because they can't charm the more rational crowd, who would only roll their eyes at it all.
I posted a quote by Prof Carroll Quigley that explains the right wing myth which calls these bankers 'communists'. Yes the so called 'libertarians' incorrectly call them 'communists' and yes a fear of something called 'communism' has been programmed into the american psyche due to all the 'red scare' propaganda by the corporate powers so yes it is very highly charged language, but the task for discearning people like you and me who are tryin to pick our way through all this is to understand what they are talking about
As Qugley explains the cabal are not communists but they do work with communists when it suits them to do so. The word 'communism' is abused out of all recognition by the US corporate media in their attempt to create an outside bogeyman. True communism is DE-CENTRALISED where the workers are empowered. The form of government the corporate media attaches the word 'communism' to is a centralised dictatorship that controls centrally a planned economy. This centrally controlled form of government is exactly what the cabal want which is why the US 'libertarians' equate their aims for world government to 'communism'
In fact it suits the so called libertarians to misscall it communism because their agenda is to create an anarcho-capitalist system and they want to hide from people the option of true communism
So this is why i find myself in the bizarre situation of quoting from so called 'libertarians' because even though i disagree with their vision i DO agree with their distaste for centralised power. I also want to see de-centralised power but the system i would like to see is anarcho-communism (there's that scary word 'communism' again!)
In fact to this degree i even have something in common with the cabal in that i don't believe the dissolving of national borders is a bad thing, i just don't want to see it replaced with a centralised power i want to see a global community develop where people run their own communities from the bottom up (not dictated to from the top down)
You can probably post jumbled quotes and videos like that all day long-- the Internet is full of them. And the reason that the Internet is full of them is because they're simpler, sexier and more exciting than reading in-depth, focused articles that actually explain more about what's really going on.
The reality of that is that if you post long in depth articles on a chat forum not many people will listen to you, but if you post a quote by benjamin franklin explaining that the true cause of the American revolution was to throw off the international bankers then more people will take notice and then hopefully seek out more indepth information (and i have posted articles and links to articles as well!!)
I'm not going to deny that there have been some highly questionable tactics used by governments or that the corporations have an interest in growth that can be extremely shortsighted and disrespectful of their consumer base… but has it all been a plot to oppress everyone and turn us back into a feudal society of mindless zombies? NO. We've already had feudalism… everyone knows that this is better. If they don't know that, then they won't be successful.
We broke out of fuedalism because of the rise of a merchant class who became wealthy and more influential; these then got organised and challenged the aristocracy who then had to begrudgingly share power with the merchants.
Now we have this new elite seeking to destroy the middle class (low interest rates are destroying middle class savings)....have you noticed the gap widening between the top 1% and the rest of us? They wish to create a two tier system where they have access to all the best that the world can offer while the rest of us are bound to stifling work conditions
This rise of merchant class saw the creation of a bourgeoisie who got fat off the sweat of the workers who were working in horrific conditions in the industrial revolution, not to mention the use of slaves all around the world in various colonys; there are cities here in my country built on the wealth of the sugar trade which came through the blood, sweat and tears of millions of africans and asians......are all the fine clothes and architectural decorations worth the suffering of all those people, not to mention how it poisons the soul of my country to have been a part of that crime?
Then the workers who were being exploited got organised and they formed bodies like trade unions and friendly societies and cooperatives and they began to challenge the bourgeoisie. By unifying and acting as one voice they were able to demand better pay, better health and safety conditions, better healthcare and an education for their children so that they might have a chance to rise above the hardships of the factory floor or the tilled field
They began to organise into political parties and groups but the secret society network of the elites sought to infiltrate and misslead these groups. I'll talk about one such plot in my next post but first another event played a role in taking the wind out of the sails of the working persons movement: world war 1.
WWI saw an entire generation of european working men bled dry. This was followed soon after WWII which did the same again. Even after the working people had taken this double blow they still worried the government enough for the government to create in the UK a national health service (NHS) although some would argue this was actually done because the elite were shocked at the poor health of their conscripted soldiery coming out of the industrial towns and cities and to ensure a better supply of soldiers for the future; but they also improved housing under the 'homes for heroes' scheme and a political party called the 'Labour' party gained power
The 'labour' party claims to be a working mans party and recieves financial support from the trade unions but the philosophical engine room of the party is the fabian society who are part of the secret society network; many people in Britain can't understand why the labour party have allowed tax cuts for the super rich or why they have increased the lower tax band to tax the lower earners more....but its no mystery to me...they are not what they claim to be (in truth they are just another wing of the business party....they are the left wing gatekeepers and the 'Conservative' (Tory) party are the right wing gatekeepers....much like the democrats and the republicans in the US)
So because society has always been unbalanced there have been constant revolutions as the people at the bottom of the heap ('shit always rolls downhill') get sick and tired of being downtrodden, rise up and demand a better deal.
What i'm saying is that process needs to continue until everyone is in the loop....until everyone has quality of life and a say in the decision making process. As always throughout history the elite are trying to resist this rise of the workers....the workers need to become more empowered to get a seat at the top table and the job of the elites (in their eyes) is to keep the workers dissempowered so that they can't get a seat at the top table
The solution the elites have come up with to deal with the empowerment of the workers (becoming more and more self aware due to things like the internet....see all the recent occupy protests, industrial strike actions and other grass roots movements expressing themselves recently) is to try and create a new system where they will still be in control but the workers will be so tightly controlled that resistance will be virtually impossible
This they can attempt through creating a surveillance society that can spot and squash dissent before it grows, they can make people dependent on the corporations for everything (most crucially food) and they can control the flow of money not just the printing of it but the use of it by people electronically either through all money transactions being carried out through cards (which can be controlled and cut off centrally) or through RF microchips inserted under the skin of people which can also be switched off if a person dissents
This process of antagonism between the workers and those that live off their investments (ie live off the sweat, blood and tears of the workers) has gone on throughout history and is still going on today. I am saying the workers need more freedom, more quality of life, more autonomy, more say in the running of their communities and the elite (who have had to give some ground usually in the form of comforts to pacify the workers) are seeking to combat this by ever more dictatorial powers
But it makes sense that Africa be regarded as the final frontier for consumerism-- do you think we should just allow all of the genocide and murder?
It is the corporate dominated west that is fuelling all the violence....the solution they are offering to this problem they themselves are creating is to go in there and carry out some genocide and murder of their own! Of course they want to do this because random destablisation is good to keep people weak but now they have more specific goals and must send in their military to be more precise in their aims
Let's say I agree that we are the sole cause of it-- how would you fix that situation, exactly? Do you think that if we just left them alone, that China would help them? Do you think that they would all just drop their guns, stop fighting for power and say 'now that whitey's gone, we can all be friends!' cue sunrise, cue rainbow, cue fluffy bunnies and lions and zebra all living together in harmony?
I think that there are attempts afoot to help Africa. In fact ghaddafi had a plan to create an African bank to fund development in Africa....he had the money ready to do it and everything
The west goes in with the bomb and bullet (because our elite are essentially rascist as the quotes i've posted should show) but the chinese have gone in with money....they are investing heavily in Africa and have built all sorts of infrastructure....if i was african i know which group i would want to do business with
One of the aims of neoliberalism is to stop countries diversifying ie to get them to produce one key crop....this then makes them vulnerable to the market place (price fluctuations) and more easily controlled by the central bankers and corporate control system
The cabal have a history of ripping off african countries a prime example would be Ghana. here's a clip of Adam Curtis film 'Pandoras Box' about how the west helped scupper the plans of Kwame Nkruma:
[video=youtube;UXFM-j9mZCk]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXFM-j9mZCk[/video]
Obviously you think that America should stay out-- what exactly do you think would be best for the less stable parts of Africa at this point? Oh wait, I know-- anarcho communism! Yep, as soon as you remove the capitalism that they don't even have from the mix they'll just drop all of the tribal/ethnic divisions and get along. And hey-- it will be easy since for the most part they've already nailed the 'anarchy' (well, unless they're experiencing dictator #457897975 that week).
I think we should acknowledge the damage we have caused there through our interference
I think we need to take care of our own business and by that i mean we need to reform our system. Anarcho-communism might not be the next step. The next step needs to be to halt the centralisation of power however and to bolster democracy. This means tackling the cabal of bankers and taking away their ability to print money. We also need to get rid of all tax havens so the cabal can't run with their money; this will of course require coordination across countries which can't happen whilst the cabal holds the levers of power in each of those countries
This means that change is going to have to come from the grass roots. People are going to need to reject every organisation and instrument of the cabal. We need to reject their political parties, we need to reject their wars, we need to reject their banks, we need to reject their corporations and their products, we need to rejects their reforms of our laws, we need to reject their GM food, we need to reject their media, we need to reject their secret societies, we need to reject their contracts and their debt, we need to reject their authority etc
We need to encourage de-centralisation for example permaculture, peer to peer lending, mesh internet and encryption of the internet (to prtect the flow of information), use independent media, support localll produced goods made by local suppliers (not the big corporations) etc (see alternatives to capitalism thread for more examples)
Sure all this might be looking very unlikely at the moment because awareness is not at a critical mass yet and people have become very dependent on the corporations but the economic climate is going to worsen and the hardship this will bring to people can provide fertile ground for new perceptions to develop as they begin to question the old order
We need to get to grips with the secret societies for example a british politican Jack Straw changed the law recently so that law judges don't have to declare that they are freemasons! That sort of thing needs to be undone