One of the stand out pop tracks for 2018 so far, checks all the boxes for a solid pop music release. The chord structure is basic, but that is not exactly a crime for a pop song, it's more like what you expect. But the chord similarities and contrasts between verse and chorus are truly absorbing, I am really interested by this, probably because I am really just getting started in thinking about pop music very deeply. Standard 4:4 time signature, shared with almost every pop song, unless the vocalist is being marketed as unusually talented, as like Ariana Grande. (Compare to Tori Amos I guess, who is not a pop star but a legitimate Rock Goddess, and whose mind breaks down time signatures as easily as you and I put dinner in the microwave.) The melody is very catchy though which is what matters in pop. All the components fit together very well. There's nothing shocking, which is maybe a slightly bad thing because it means that there's limited innovation, and you would expect more from "THE BIGGEST SONG OF THE YEAR" (which this is clearly not), but it's also a good thing when everything goes together well. There is a reliable build up through verse, bridge, to the thrillingly explosive chorus. There is a minor, almost undetectable problem with the formula of the coda, "cheesy sound", which is really the weak point of the song. You'll hear it if you listen a few times.
I wonder if there's a name for the last part of the chorus that joins back to the new verse? I never thought of it before. It's not really distinct from the rest of the chorus so maybe it doesn't deserve a special name, but yet it is different from the pattern of the rest of the chorus cause it has to lead back. Anyway, just wondering...
The thing that gives this song depth and makes it memorable is the thematic content of the lyrics, about being a quiet person, but building and turning up the volume at the chorus. Romance is emotionally explosive, so turn it up! "You made me want to stop blending into the background and raise my voice." Very romantic! It's a well worn trope, but it's executed with respectable emotional finesse here. It works very well. Anyone interested in writing pop music would be proud to have created this song. Unfortunately, this song has 6 credited writers. I think that is quite sad for the writers. But I'm not sad for them. All that matters in the end is the product, so I guess they can be happy that they collaborated.
The most interesting literary feature of the lyrics is "Our heart a little clearer". Traditionally in English, I mean if you are a student of Shakespeare, you would talk about giving each other your hearts, exchanging hearts, my heart belongs to you, your heart belongs to me. It's a bit unusual to discuss a shared heart.
Interesting vocal performance. At first listen the performance seems incredibly limited (and it is difficult to discriminate organic performance aspects from digital postproduction) but further listening rewards with greater detail. The standout moments are the conversational flexibility on the surprising phrase "I wanna get drunk with you", the (digitally assisted) non-verbal vocal run at the coda, and the background double-track in the final refrains where Steinfeld reaches into her upper register. She is definitely above the achievement level of an ensemble vocalist but it's interesting that it's not immediately apparent that she is. Her voice sounds so ordinary at first. The defining feature of her voice is a slightly husky quality, as though she has been screaming a lot or as though she has been smoking. This quality is very "now", very chic, very fashionable, like a popular runway model. Perhaps she has been smoking to achieve this but it's impossible for me to tell with my very humble expertise, it could be a natural quality of her voice. If it is not a natural quality, her voice may not survive it for long, there's a possibility that the voice will lose its commercial value. I know from what I have done to my own once beautiful voice how easy it is to wreck a voice forever. But the vocalist would be aware of the peril, it's her choice what she does with her voice. Anyway, like I said, could be a congenital feature of her voice, I don't really know. Anyway, part of the charm of this song is how easy it is to sing in the shower, but how difficult it is to perform really well. It's deceptive.
The wealth display in the music video does not appeal to me, detracts from the romance of the song, but it is to be expected because of the film soundtrack that this song is for, which is philosophically very laissez-faire. (I shouldn't complain, I love commercial music.) Anyway, I don't know what else is on the soundtrack but I can't really imagine a bigger bang than this song. I remember Ellie Goulding's "Love Me Like You Do" was the commanding pop track from the first film in the series, so I guess this is the equivalent track to that for this film. (The big single from the second installment, from Taylor Swift and Zayn Malik "I Don't Wanna Live Forever" didn't appeal to me much, largely cause Malik's falsetto is putrid.)
Very satisfying. A solid achievement. Really excels in the pop music genre, a good example of the genre for 2018. For other people I realise that this music is probably very silly, but it's times like this, when I am fully engaged in some sort of pop confection, that I feel that I am really living. I admire the skill and talent and dedication of the writers to create some coherent and fully resolved artistic object. It's like a little capsule, we can enjoy it now for what it is, which is a very fashionable product, but it's so self-contained and fully realised that in the future people will be able to listen to it and enjoy it for what it is just the same way we do now.
Wow, I can't believe I wrote so much about that. Sorry for the flood. If you read this far, you must truly be interested in pop.
The only other thing that I have to say about this is about how difficult it would be to arrange for piano. There is a lot of effects, but very little articulation. Extremely electronic, little traditional instrumentation. Parts are very articulated, other parts are poorly articulated, all you can hear is percussion and a sort of formless sound-wall. For writing piano, a traditional instrument, articulation is basically all that matters. Piano depends on articulation to make sense. So this would be a really challenge to adapt to piano, because you would be rewriting it for the instrument rather than just transposing the existing instrumentation to the piano, as you would be for a more organically arranged pop production say featuring a lot of guitar work. I would like to try to perform this song for piano and voice though, it would be a lot of fun.