@muir
Is this basically your statement?: The U.N. is run by banks. The LON became the U.N. which attempted to fund the Communist Party of the Soviet Union because they wanted to do business with them, but Stalin, maybe during one of his party purges, killed it.
I'm pretty sure that's true. Is that what you meant?.
The bankers/businessmen behind the LON/UN did not want to fund the communist party. In fact they were terrified of communism because they saw it as a threat to their power
The soviet union wasn't communist, it was state capitalist (pretty much what we now have in the US and UK in the sense that we have a market economy that is centrally controlled). The international bankers also own big media outlets and they have created the myth that russia was communist. It wasn't, it was state capitalist.
These guys were so scared of communism that they actually funded Hitler and helped him into power because they saw him as a bulwark against the rising threat of communism. Hitler however went on the rampage, but no doubt the international bankers made a lot of money out of the war as this is always the best time to give loans to governments.
The Bolsheviks (not communists) were funded by the bankers because the bankers believed they could do business with the Bolsheviks and that they would open up russian markets to global exploitation whilst controlling the russian population
Stalin stopped this nexus between the bankers and the bolsheviks which created a genuine rift betweenRussia and the banker run US
I've read about the "New World Order". It makes me nervous, mainly because of it's membership. Lots of wealthy people that have mismaneuvered our country to where it is. The .1%. Sometimes I wonder if the ultimate aim for them isn't for a third worldish America with them as Royalty. When someone can devastate lives and walk away from it, sometimes with aid from the taxpayer, there's an issue..
These people have brought about the current economic crisis through their fiat currency system because they have managed to exercise a large amount of power and influence in the US. What they want to do is suck more countries into their neoliberal scheme which they will then control through the central banking system.
If people don't like what is happening now then why would they like it when it is scaled up to a global scope?
At this point I don't see much of a conflict to be honest with you. I assumed people can read my mind. My bad. I'm thinking of the unproven, controversial type. And I won't go into the definition of that.
Again, I think maybe a misunderstanding...which I think is how many bad tings happen. Sucks.
I honestly think the best way to approach 'conspiracy theories' is with an open mind.
I'm not saying dive right in and believe everything you hear. I'm saying don't dismiss them immediately out of hand, because even if they are largely incorrect they may still have a kernal of truth
I try to think: 'i'm open to the possibilities but i'm not going to fully assimilate this new perspective until i have found more information, but i am alive to the possibility of this being true'
Because in truth...how sure can we be of anything, when scientists can't even tell us the nature of reality?
