[PAX] Religious Beliefs - Discussions of differences, not merit.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shai Gar
  • Start date Start date

Which are you? Be certain before voting. You might not recognize these terms.

  • Total voters
    50
Flavus Aquila said:
I may continue to ask questions of atheists, which may seem to weigh its merit, but this is because I wish to understand it better (I have never been an atheist) - and then post what differences I note between it and my monotheism. Unless you @TheLastMohican: , think discussions about differences in world-view are best conducted from ignorance.
Click to expand...

When you start asking which is more practical, however, I regard it as a question of merit. For normal purposes, I see no practical differences between being a deist and being an atheist. I do see practical differences between being a theist and an atheist, however, since monotheism typically involves effects of the deity upon human lives. But to elaborate on that, I would have to go into my own opinions on what is helpful or harmful about belief in personal god(s).

Ignorance in this discussion is not a problem for me, since I have been on both sides of the fence. So if you have more questions about Christianity and/or atheism, ask away.



Flavus Aquila said:
I would have guessed that everyone starts as an indifferent agnostic until they decide what they believe.
Click to expand...
Agnosticism is defined by a certain attitude towards knowledge (that God's existence, and often a lot of other things, are inherently unknowable, and according to some, inherently at 50% probability). Children's brains work with absolutes. I'd say everyone starts out as an implicit atheist, and switches to an explicit belief before long. (Of course many children do catch on to agnostic principles later on.)
 
I'd say everyone starts out as an implicit atheist, and switches to an explicit belief before long.
Click to expand...
I am not entirely sure that's a good fit, that is if we're talking about children who haven't entertained the concept. I am not sure I would see them as atheist in any different sense than my pet rabbit would be. On the other hand, they are more capable of entertaining the concept, but I am not really sure I would call that atheist either, unless perhaps you are talking about a brief period between the conceptualization, and accepting their parent's views.
 
Jack said:
I am not entirely sure that's a good fit, that is if we're talking about children who haven't entertained the concept. I am not sure I would see them as atheist in any different sense than my pet rabbit would be. On the other hand, they are more capable of entertaining the concept, but I am not really sure I would call that atheist either, unless perhaps you are talking about a brief period between the conceptualization, and accepting their parent's views.
Click to expand...
You're describing the difference between implicit and explicit atheism. Implicit atheism is simply a lack of theism due to being unfamiliar with the concept of theism. Explicit atheism is a lack of theism (or, in some cases, a specific denial of theism) after being introduced to the concept.
 
TheLastMohican said:
You're describing the difference between implicit and explicit atheism. Implicit atheism is simply a lack of theism due to being unfamiliar with the concept of theism. Explicit atheism is a lack of theism (or, in some cases, a specific denial of theism) after being introduced to the concept.
Click to expand...

Fair enough, although it still seems to some extent like saying a housekey has implicit baldness. Which, while true, still seems somewhat irrelevant.
 
The loss of innocence

Something speaks to the man and the woman. Something in their nature whispers to them of something that feels wrong and yet right. The thoughts and feelings writhe around in their heads and bellies like a serpent. They are drawn to the world tree, which they notice gives forth fruit.

The woman is fascinated by the world tree. She wants to touch it. The man feels this is wrong but agrees. She takes the fruit from the world tree. From that moment neither of them is ever innocent ever again. From their act, children spring forth.

The story is passed down through the ages as a projection onto the external world of the inner struggles of humanity and the friction between mans urges and the laws imposed from above.

Deification results as mankind overvalues its own expressions of inner turmoil as it spills out into the world in countless forms. The laws come not from god but from the upper levels of the three estates to which everyone is a subject.

In order to carry on this ancient order of things it is the responsibility of men to make offerings to the altar of womanhood in order to ensure the continuance of the species.

This involves the performing of a ritual in which the self is lost as the man and woman become one and unify the universal man and the universal woman. The ritual ensures the natural order of things by recognising the mortality of man and woman, the cyclical rhythms of existence and the darker shades of their own inner being, whilst ensuring physical and emotional nourishment.

The same process is recognised in mother earth herself and similar steps are taken to ensure her own rhythms are maintained.

‘Ride the snake, to the lake; the ancient lake’- Jim Morrison

I want to create a new religious category called humourism. The belief that in the final analysis all that cloaks mankinds nakedness as it freefalls through the absolute is humour. Humour is the true path between sincere insanity and insincere insanity.

How does that fit into the schema?
 
Last edited:
I chose pantheistic because, by the webster definition of the term, it seems to be the best fit with my beliefs. However, I'm somewhat riding the fence between that and agnostic... sad, as riding the fence is quite painful on the goods.
 
Detective Conan said:
I chose pantheistic because, by the webster definition of the term, it seems to be the best fit with my beliefs. However, I'm somewhat riding the fence between that and agnostic... sad, as riding the fence is quite painful on the goods.
Click to expand...

Ride the fence, to the lake, the ancient lake.....doesn't have the same archetypal impact really
 
muir said:
Ride the fence, to the lake, the ancient lake.....doesn't have the same archetypal impact really
Click to expand...

But what great use of imagery <3
 
Anthropomorphism of fences and ritualistic, intimate involvement with them....that could fall under the category of fertility rites
 
What about Bi-Thiesm and Tri-Theism?

eitherway, I'm a Christian Thiest.
 
o_o
Christianity is monotheistic, don't even try to say otherwise. Triple God/desses are counted as one. Isn't the great mystery of christianity is how three parts are one god?

ETA: because you can't hear my voice, the "don't even try" bit is meant to be sarcastic.
 
Last edited:
Barnabas said:
What about Bi-Thiesm and Tri-Theism?

eitherway, I'm a Christian Thiest.
Click to expand...

Anything more than one, is Polytheism. And we don't need to know what flavour theist you are, just the differences between the stated ones.

This is not a thread about the differences in theism, if you want a thread for that, create it.
 
 
thirtiesgirl said:
I'm an atheist and secular humanist. I pray to the church of me each week with my therapist. She is my confessor, my priest, my guidance counselor and sherpa through the mountainous wilderness of my emotional state. I am the ultimate power in my universe.
Click to expand...

It sounds as though you are styling yourself as a deity in this post... or at least as some mytholigical type.

Hence my question: Is atheism always associated with the deification of self?
 
Last edited:
Shai Gar said:
Anything more than one, is Polytheism. And we don't need to know what flavour theist you are, just the differences between the stated ones.

This is not a thread about the differences in theism, if you want a thread for that, create it.
Click to expand...

Your thread title is labled "Religious Beliefs - Discussion of differences, not merit"

seeing as there are differences between mono, bi, tri and poly theism I figured they were up for discussion as religious belief systems.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top