Social Experiment. Perception of Quran vs. Bible

social-engineering.png

Posting pictures from Google images does not constitute an argument.
 
Groups designated as Foreign Terrorist Organizations (United States State Department)
List is current as of September 30, 2015,[SUP][7][/SUP] organized by region and country of origin:
[TABLE="class: wikitable sortable plainrowheaders jquery-tablesorter"]
[TR]
[TH="class: headerSort"]Date Added[/TH]
[TH="class: headerSort"]Name[/TH]
[TH="class: headerSort"]Region[/TH]
[TH="class: headerSort, width: 12%"]Location of Operations[/TH]
[TH="class: headerSort, width: 35%"]Notes[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]October 8, 1997[/TD]
[TD]Abu Nidal Organization (ANO)[/TD]
[TD]Middle East[/TD]
[TD]Palestinian Territories[/TD]
[TD]62 FR 52650[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]October 8, 1997[/TD]
[TD]Abu Sayyaf Group (ASG)[/TD]
[TD]Asia[/TD]
[TD]Philippines[/TD]
[TD]62 FR 52650[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]October 8, 1997[/TD]
[TD]Aum Shinrikyo[/TD]
[TD]Asia[/TD]
[TD]Japan[/TD]
[TD]62 FR 52650[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]October 8, 1997[/TD]
[TD]Euskadi Ta Askatasuna (Basque Fatherland and Liberty) (ETA)[/TD]
[TD]Europe[/TD]
[TD]Spain, France[/TD]
[TD]62 FR 52650[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]October 8, 1997[/TD]
[TD]Gama’a al-Islamiyya[/TD]
[TD]Africa, Middle East[/TD]
[TD]Egypt[/TD]
[TD]62 FR 52650[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]October 8, 1997[/TD]
[TD]Hamas (Islamic Resistance Movement)[/TD]
[TD]Middle East[/TD]
[TD]Palestinian Territories[/TD]
[TD]62 FR 52650[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]October 8, 1997[/TD]
[TD]Harakat ul-Mujahidin (HUM)[/TD]
[TD]Asia[/TD]
[TD]Pakistan[/TD]
[TD]62 FR 52650[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]October 8, 1997[/TD]
[TD]Hezbollah (Army of God)[/TD]
[TD]Middle East[/TD]
[TD]Lebanon[/TD]
[TD]62 FR 52650[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]October 8, 1997[/TD]
[TD]Kahane Chai[/TD]
[TD]Middle East[/TD]
[TD]Israel[/TD]
[TD]62 FR 52650[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]October 8, 1997[/TD]
[TD]Kongra-Gel (formerly Kurdistan Workers' Party) (KGK)[/TD]
[TD]Middle East[/TD]
[TD]Turkey, Iraq, Iran, Syria[/TD]
[TD]Formerly PKK, KADEK. 62 FR 52650
.[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]October 8, 1997[/TD]
[TD]Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE)[/TD]
[TD]Asia[/TD]
[TD]Sri Lanka[/TD]
[TD]62 FR 52650[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]October 8, 1997[/TD]
[TD]National Liberation Army (ELN)[/TD]
[TD]South America[/TD]
[TD]Colombia[/TD]
[TD]62 FR 52650[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]October 8, 1997[/TD]
[TD]Palestine Liberation Front (PLF)[/TD]
[TD]Middle East[/TD]
[TD]Palestinian Territories[/TD]
[TD]62 FR 52650[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]October 8, 1997[/TD]
[TD]Islamic Jihad Group[/TD]
[TD]Middle East[/TD]
[TD]Palestinian Territories[/TD]
[TD]62 FR 52650[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]October 8, 1997[/TD]
[TD]Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP)[/TD]
[TD]Middle East[/TD]
[TD]Palestinian Territories[/TD]
[TD]62 FR 52650[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]October 8, 1997[/TD]
[TD]PFLP-General Command (PFLP-GC)[/TD]
[TD]Middle East[/TD]
[TD]Palestinian Territories[/TD]
[TD]62 FR 52650[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]October 8, 1997[/TD]
[TD]Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC)[/TD]
[TD]South America[/TD]
[TD]Colombia[/TD]
[TD]62 FR 52650[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]October 8, 1997[/TD]
[TD]Revolutionary People's Liberation Party/Front (DHKP/C)[/TD]
[TD]Europe[/TD]
[TD]Turkey[/TD]
[TD]62 FR 52650[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]October 8, 1997[/TD]
[TD]Shining Path (Sendero Luminoso, SL)[/TD]
[TD]South America[/TD]
[TD]Peru[/TD]
[TD]62 FR 52650[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]October 8, 1999[/TD]
[TD]al-Qa’ida[/TD]
[TD]Worldwide[/TD]
[TD]Afghanistan, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia[/TD]
[TD]64 FR 55112[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]September 25, 2000[/TD]
[TD]Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU)[/TD]
[TD]Asia[/TD]
[TD]Uzbekistan, Afghanistan[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]May 16, 2001[/TD]
[TD]Real Irish Republican Army (RIRA)[/TD]
[TD]Europe[/TD]
[TD]Ireland, United Kingdom[/TD]
[TD]Associated with 32 County Sovereignty Movement (32CSM)[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]December 26, 2001[/TD]
[TD]Jaish-e-Mohammed (Army of Mohammed) (JEM)[/TD]
[TD]Asia[/TD]
[TD]Pakistan[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]December 26, 2001[/TD]
[TD]Lashkar-e Tayyiba (Army of the Righteous) (LET)[/TD]
[TD]Asia[/TD]
[TD]Pakistan[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]March 27, 2002[/TD]
[TD]Al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades[/TD]
[TD]Middle East[/TD]
[TD]Palestinian Territories[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]March 27, 2002[/TD]
[TD]Asbat an-Ansar[/TD]
[TD]Middle East[/TD]
[TD]Lebanon[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]March 27, 2002[/TD]
[TD]al-Qa’ida in the Islamic Maghreb[/TD]
[TD]Africa, Middle East[/TD]
[TD]Algeria, Mali, Niger[/TD]
[TD](formerly GSPC)[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]August 9, 2002[/TD]
[TD]Communist Party of the Philippines/New People's Army (CPP/NPA)[/TD]
[TD]Asia[/TD]
[TD]Philippines[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]October 23, 2002[/TD]
[TD]Jemaah Islamiya organization (JI)[/TD]
[TD]Asia[/TD]
[TD]Indonesia[/TD]
[TD]Also in Brunei, Malaysia, Thailand, Philippines, Singapore[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]January 30, 2003[/TD]
[TD]Lashkar i Jhangvi[/TD]
[TD]Asia[/TD]
[TD]Pakistan[/TD]
[TD]March 22, 2004[/TD]
[TD]Al-Qaeda Kurdish Battalions[/TD]
[TD]Middle East[/TD]
[TD]Iraq[/TD]
[TD]Formerly Ansar al-Islam[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]July 13, 2004[/TD]
[TD]Continuity Irish Republican Army (CIRA)[/TD]
[TD]Europe[/TD]
[TD]Ireland, United Kingdom[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]March 27, 2002[/TD]
[TD]Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG)[/TD]
[TD]Africa[/TD]
[TD]Libya[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]December 17, 2004[/TD]
[TD]Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (formerly Al-Qaeda in Iraq aka Tanzim Qa'idat al-Jihad fi Bilad al-Rafidayn (QJBR))[/TD]
[TD]Worldwide[/TD]
[TD]Iraq Syria Libya Nigeria[/TD]
[TD]Formerly Jama'at al-Tawhid wa'al-Jihad, JTJ, al-Zarqawi Network. Al-Nusra Front is considered an alias of Al-Qaeda in Iraq[SUP][8][/SUP][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]June 17, 2005[/TD]
[TD]Islamic Jihad Union (IJU)[/TD]
[TD]Asia[/TD]
[TD]Uzbekistan[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]March 5, 2008[/TD]
[TD]Harkat-ul-Jihad al-Islami (HUJI-B)[/TD]
[TD]Asia[/TD]
[TD]Bangladesh[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]March 18, 2008[/TD]
[TD]Al-Shabaab[/TD]
[TD]Africa[/TD]
[TD]Somalia[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]May 18, 2009[/TD]
[TD]Revolutionary Struggle[/TD]
[TD]Europe[/TD]
[TD]Greece[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]July 2, 2009[/TD]
[TD]Kata'ib Hezbollah[/TD]
[TD]Middle East[/TD]
[TD]Iraq[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]January 19, 2010[/TD]
[TD]al-Qa'ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP)[/TD]
[TD]Middle East[/TD]
[TD]Saudi Arabia[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]August 6, 2010[/TD]
[TD]Harkat-ul-Jihad al-Islami (HUJI)[/TD]
[TD]Asia[/TD]
[TD]Bangladesh[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]September 1, 2010[/TD]
[TD]Tehrik-i-Taliban (TTP)[/TD]
[TD]Asia[/TD]
[TD]Pakistan[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]November 4, 2010[/TD]
[TD]Jundallah (People's Resistance Movement of Iran, or PRMI) (Iran)[SUP][9][/SUP][/TD]
[TD]Asia[/TD]
[TD]Iran[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]May 23, 2011[/TD]
[TD]Army of Islam (Palestinian)[SUP][10][/SUP][/TD]
[TD]Middle East[/TD]
[TD]Palestinian Territories[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]September 19, 2011[/TD]
[TD]Indian Mujahideen (IM) (India)[SUP][11][/SUP][/TD]
[TD]Asia[/TD]
[TD]India[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]September 19, 2011[/TD]
[TD]Jamaah Ansharut Tauhid (JAT)[/TD]
[TD]Asia[/TD]
[TD]Indonesia[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]May 30, 2012[/TD]
[TD]Abdullah Azzam Brigades[/TD]
[TD]Middle East[/TD]
[TD]Iraq[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]September 19, 2012[/TD]
[TD]Haqqani network[SUP][12][/SUP][/TD]
[TD]Asia[/TD]
[TD]Afghanistan[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]March 22, 2013[/TD]
[TD]Ansar Dine[SUP][13][/SUP][/TD]
[TD]Africa[/TD]
[TD]Mali[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]November 14, 2013[/TD]
[TD]Boko Haram[SUP][14][/SUP][/TD]
[TD]Africa[/TD]
[TD]Nigeria[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]November 14, 2013[/TD]
[TD]Ansaru[SUP][15][/SUP][/TD]
[TD]Africa[/TD]
[TD]Nigeria[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]December 19, 2013[/TD]
[TD]al-Mulathamun Brigade[SUP][15][/SUP][/TD]
[TD]Africa[/TD]
[TD]Algeria[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]January 13, 2014[/TD]
[TD]Ansar al-Shari'a in Benghazi[SUP][15][/SUP][/TD]
[TD]Africa[/TD]
[TD]Libya[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]January 13, 2014[/TD]
[TD]Ansar al-Shari'a in Darnah[SUP][15][/SUP][/TD]
[TD]Africa[/TD]
[TD]Libya[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]January 13, 2014[/TD]
[TD]Ansar al-Shari'a in Tunisia[SUP][15][/SUP][/TD]
[TD]Africa[/TD]
[TD]Tunisia[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]April 10, 2014[/TD]
[TD]Ansar Bayt al-Maqdis[SUP][16][/SUP][/TD]
[TD]Africa, Middle East[/TD]
[TD]Egypt[/TD]
[TD]Also known as ISIL Sinai Province, ISIL SP [SUP][17][/SUP][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]May 15, 2014[/TD]
[TD]Al-Nusra Front[/TD]
[TD]Middle East[/TD]
[TD]Syria[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]August 20, 2014[/TD]
[TD]Mujahideen Shura Council in the Environs of Jerusalem[/TD]
[TD]Africa, Middle East[/TD]
[TD]Egypt[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]September 30, 2015[/TD]
[TD]Jaysh Rijal al-Tariq al Naqshabandi (JRTN)[SUP][18][/SUP][/TD]
[TD]Middle East[/TD]
[TD]Iraq[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Muslims, Left-wingers, and colonised populations.

*Breaking my own principle of no large cut 'n pastes.*
 
This discussion has really gone in an odd direction......I haven't been watching this thread because I'm in finals week, but please keep it civilized guys.

This isn't a thread about which religion is better or worse, or which is more violent. Rather, this thread was to point out that even people who are supposedly Christian are susceptible to the same biases that we all are, and that we should be aware of this tendency. Hopefully even improve ourselves about it. Here's an interesting question. How do we fix this general behavior of condemnation of Muslims, because of our bias, and improve the social structures in a mutually beneficial way?

I don't know. i'm really tired right now, so i'll let you guys go whatever way.
 
This discussion has really gone in an odd direction......I haven't been watching this thread because I'm in finals week, but please keep it civilized guys.

This isn't a thread about which religion is better or worse, or which is more violent. Rather, this thread was to point out that even people who are supposedly Christian are susceptible to the same biases that we all are, and that we should be aware of this tendency. Hopefully even improve ourselves about it. Here's an interesting question. How do we fix this general behavior of condemnation of Muslims, because of our bias, and improve the social structures in a mutually beneficial way?

I don't know. i'm really tired right now, so i'll let you guys go whatever way.
Containing islam would be one way of keeping things civilized. (Couldn't resist that pun).

It is possibly biased to assume that the people in that video were Christians, or supposedly so, [MENTION=11455]dogman6126[/MENTION] .

In terms of reforming biases about muslims, it would require either a lot of mental gymnastics in the non-muslim observer. On the other hand, biases against muslims could be remedied if sharia law were to be overturned and abolished in muslim countries and communities; if peaceful, coherent, stable societies of muslim nations could be found in the place of the actual muslim nations; if muslims themselves could generally adopt a more accepting attitude towards other religions/customs/views, such that the vast statistical majority of muslim families would be OK with children choosing other beliefs/non-belief; if the huge number of different terrorist organisations would close; if highly devout/enthusiastic practice of islam did not ipso facto make one sympathetic/apologetic with jihadists; and if there were some definitive interpretation of islam, which were acceptable to the vast majority of muslims, which excluded all intolerance to other religions/cultures (especially jews), excluded misogyny, excluded violence, and contained a uniform set of morals to be applied uniformly.
 
ISIS and Al-Qaeda wants us to hate Muslims so they have an easier time recruiting people over-seas. If this thread is any indication, I'm declaring a 15-love to them and similar groups.
 
ISIS and Al-Qaeda wants us to hate Muslims so they have an easier time recruiting people over-seas. If this thread is any indication, I'm declaring a 15-love to them and similar groups.
They'll probably want to recruit you.
 
It's funny to see someone claim they're qualified for a doctorate and misspell 'Sumerians' at the same time.

Seriously Matt. Thats the best you can come up with?
I always find arguments funny when a person starts pointing out spelling and grammar as a reason to not consider whats being said. If you want to use this simple excuse to close your fragile mind and protect it... you will.
 
Ive studied religion on my own enough to the point where I should probably have a doctorate in it. The only thing is that it wasnt "guided" study. I didnt look at what I was told to look at and my research went where I decided.
As an example, did you know that a christ figure had been talked about 2000 years previous to the recording of the christ in the bible by the Ancient Sumamarians. The resemblance is uncanny. Its likely this figure is where the christ figure originated from. Someone took a very old story and rehashed it.

Are you saying Jesus didn't exist as a person historically? I don't think that's really up for debate. What is up for debate is all the things attributed to him like the miracles etc. since I think most of that is only found in the gospels.
 
ISIS and Al-Qaeda wants us to hate Muslims so they have an easier time recruiting people over-seas. If this thread is any indication, I'm declaring a 15-love to them and similar groups.

Well too bad for them, we can just hate Islam for the sake of Muslims and humanity.
 
Well too bad for them, we can just hate Islam for the sake of Muslims and humanity.

I'm not taking sides, I'm just saying that reports point to this being a part of the plan for extremists. It's like the IRA benefitting from anti-British sentiments.

The fact that people think that I have sympathies for extremist groups for stating this proves my point.
 
Are you saying Jesus didn't exist as a person historically? I don't think that's really up for debate. What is up for debate is all the things attributed to him like the miracles etc. since I think most of that is only found in the gospels.

The reading that I have done along with the research suggest to me that whether Jesus existed at all is in fact still a debate. Do you have anything that proves he existed?
 
If we look at percentages I would ask how many Muslims kniw their religion well. How many Christians etc... I mean beyond what their religious leaders teach. The percentage of people committing murder... because thats what it is...in the name of Islam is pretty damn small by all accounts. I do not think you can judge a religion or anything for that matter on the actions of a comparatively small number of people.
 
Containing islam would be one way of keeping things civilized. (Couldn't resist that pun).

It is possibly biased to assume that the people in that video were Christians, or supposedly so, [MENTION=11455]dogman6126[/MENTION] .
It's not an assumption to say supposedly. It was suggested that they were Christian. Further, I don't recognize the point of this line. What does this matter? ad hominem? I did say that all people are susceptible to this bias, and I certainly don't exclude myself. Base rate neglect and attribution biases are fundamental side effects of our minds. no one is immune.

In terms of reforming biases about muslims, it would require either a lot of mental gymnastics in the non-muslim observer. On the other hand, biases against muslims could be remedied if sharia law were to be overturned and abolished in muslim countries and communities; if peaceful, coherent, stable societies of muslim nations could be found in the place of the actual muslim nations; if muslims themselves could generally adopt a more accepting attitude towards other religions/customs/views, such that the vast statistical majority of muslim families would be OK with children choosing other beliefs/non-belief; if the huge number of different terrorist organisations would close; if highly devout/enthusiastic practice of islam did not ipso facto make one sympathetic/apologetic with jihadists; and if there were some definitive interpretation of islam, which were acceptable to the vast majority of muslims, which excluded all intolerance to other religions/cultures (especially jews), excluded misogyny, excluded violence, and contained a uniform set of morals to be applied uniformly.

You have put a lot of suggestions into how they could change, but why to either? The problem is in the perception of Muslims. It is the fact that MOST Muslims, just like MOST Christians are good honest people just trying to make their way through the world. Peaceful and loving. Why should all of those good people be punished for what is no more than a loud (and violent) minority? Sure, maybe this isn't a question of punishment, and is instead a question about obligation on their part, but then I would ask why is that obligation taking priority? You're suggestion of mental gymnastics very well could work. Let's educate our people. Sure, we should fight the loud and violent minority, but would shouldn't fight the others. THAT is OUR moral obligation (at least the latter, the former is not really an obligation, at least in the same sense). If anything we have an obligation to protect those that are peaceful from those of us that are not.

The point that I'm getting at is your comment seems to suggest (although you don't directly state this direction. Even if it isn't your thought, you must admit it is so easy to construe the comment in that way) that the problems mostly come from THEM and not US, but that's simply not true. Not only is that the wrong way to frame the question (it forms US vs. THEM in group biases), but it is to misrepresent the solutions. We need to solve the problem in our culture, as we don't really have a right to tell them how to solve their culture (especially if most of us don't even understand it!). We need to stop being hateful of ALL Muslims. We need to accept those that are peaceful, and protect them from both the violent minority of Muslims, and the loud (and currently not violent) minority of Christians. What happens if all this talk of deporting Muslims, or tagging them, or restricting their religious freedoms actually goes through? What happens if people start violently attacking Muslims on the streets? We have an obligation not as Christians, but as Americans to prevent THAT from happening.
 
Here's a few quotes from the Torah.

"Anyone arrogant enough to reject the verdict of the [holy man] who represents God must be put to death. Such evil must be purged."

Deuteronomy 17:12

"Make ready to slaughter [the infidel’s] sons for the guilt of their fathers; Lest they rise and posses the earth, and fill the breadth of the world with tyrants."

Isaiah 14:21

"If a man commits adultery with another man's wife, both the man and the woman must be put to death."

Leviticus 20:10

To anyone saying that it is impossible to reform Islam, or to practice it in a non-violent way, look at your own religious texts. Nothing is impossible.
 
Here's a few quotes from the Torah.

"Anyone arrogant enough to reject the verdict of the [holy man] who represents God must be put to death. Such evil must be purged."

Deuteronomy 17:12

"Make ready to slaughter [the infidel’s] sons for the guilt of their fathers; Lest they rise and posses the earth, and fill the breadth of the world with tyrants."

Isaiah 14:21

"If a man commits adultery with another man's wife, both the man and the woman must be put to death."

Leviticus 20:10

To anyone saying that it is impossible to reform Islam, or to practice it in a non-violent way, look at your own religious texts. Nothing is impossible.

Excellent post.
 
Religion is primarily a way to self identify and a set of dogma second. That's one reason parents get upset when you change your religion. Why anyone would be surprised that any cult members don't fully understand their religion is beyond me... Well no it's not, people being ignorant is what I expect.
 
Sometimes I try to imagine population sizes. I think of a hundred people, then 1000. Then 20 or 30 thousand sitting in a full stadium. 7 billion people in the world. There is going to be conflict. Remember when 250, 000 people died in Indonesia? People hardly think of that anymore unless they live in the area. No one could wrap their head around that when it happened though. It was tragedy on a previously unknown human level. Today we here of a single person killed in the news and sometimes that has more effect then 250, 000 dying if they are killed in a certain way. By someone elses hand rather than nature. All of it...ALL of it is about perspective. It takes work to see the world this way but its truth. As a civilized society we should be making the effort though.
 
It's not an assumption to say supposedly. It was suggested that they were Christian. Further, I don't recognize the point of this line. What does this matter? ad hominem? I did say that all people are susceptible to this bias, and I certainly don't exclude myself. Base rate neglect and attribution biases are fundamental side effects of our minds. no one is immune.



You have put a lot of suggestions into how they could change, but why to either? The problem is in the perception of Muslims. It is the fact that MOST Muslims, just like MOST Christians are good honest people just trying to make their way through the world. Peaceful and loving. Why should all of those good people be punished for what is no more than a loud (and violent) minority? Sure, maybe this isn't a question of punishment, and is instead a question about obligation on their part, but then I would ask why is that obligation taking priority? You're suggestion of mental gymnastics very well could work. Let's educate our people. Sure, we should fight the loud and violent minority, but would shouldn't fight the others. THAT is OUR moral obligation (at least the latter, the former is not really an obligation, at least in the same sense). If anything we have an obligation to protect those that are peaceful from those of us that are not.

The point that I'm getting at is your comment seems to suggest (although you don't directly state this direction. Even if it isn't your thought, you must admit it is so easy to construe the comment in that way) that the problems mostly come from THEM and not US, but that's simply not true. Not only is that the wrong way to frame the question (it forms US vs. THEM in group biases), but it is to misrepresent the solutions. We need to solve the problem in our culture, as we don't really have a right to tell them how to solve their culture (especially if most of us don't even understand it!). We need to stop being hateful of ALL Muslims. We need to accept those that are peaceful, and protect them from both the violent minority of Muslims, and the loud (and currently not violent) minority of Christians. What happens if all this talk of deporting Muslims, or tagging them, or restricting their religious freedoms actually goes through? What happens if people start violently attacking Muslims on the streets? We have an obligation not as Christians, but as Americans to prevent THAT from happening.

Whatever your ASSERTIONS might be about the majority of muslims, the FACT is that the vast majority of muslims follow sharia law (and this is not just some theoretical moral code - it is literally something even a non-muslim can be tried under in a court). I think you ought to familiarise yourself with sharia law a little better, because it is obvious you have not.
 
Back
Top