SlowUpTake
Community Member
- MBTI
- INFJ
- Enneagram
- ?
Because many of the oppressed are seemingly lost inside a hit or a mental health crisis of some sort. Which of the oppressed can stand up for themselves when they barely have the strength for their daily existence nor do they know what to stand for exactly? Even the schools in the areas with issues are shutting down. It's not going to be as easy as a revolution. That will likely result to more losses. The biggest profit earners need to be intent at making a difference or capitalism is going to implode on their faces. If the income disparity continues to be top heavy, it is not unlikely for there to be unrest but it will not be a revolution. It will be the beginning of failed states. Nobody wants that but it would be interesting how a leading democratic country would curtail that kind of failure.
Atp with the unbearable and unmanageable costs of living for a reasonable level of lifestyle, repayment of loans, having no default and "a good credit" still doesn't get you much in life, so if you can't afford to pay them back, don't even bother. The vast majority of people are already priced out of being able to buy homes, put down payments on homes or even qualify for semi-decent rentals, so what's even the point of not defaulting on student loans? They've already gotten most people to a point where they have nothing to gain from paying back, and it's not like children at 18 even really understand or know what loans mean and how interest repayments work. Most people who took loans only pay interest so their loan doesn't even decrease for decades at a time, or won't decrease for decades.
If you've managed to secure a decent living already, I would say just default, or pay the absolute bare minimum and forget about being debt free. There's really no point. These people have created an unsustainable system and let capitalism eat itself. Why should you all keep paying for their fucking yachts and private islands?
I had student loans and I defaulted right after. Luckily I had the opportunity to escape the system entirely so eventually they had no choice but to call bad debt on my loans and they're no longer in the system. I have 0 credit, but honestly I'm 40+ and have created a life without needing credit at all. I know that's not possible for the vast majority of people, but the more we establish credit, the less we have for ourselves. My lifestyle can't be replicated by most people, but don't fall into the trap of believing that you'll ever be debt free. They're not going to let that happen.
America's future is a "rental" economy where they're already preparing to ensure that Gen Z can never buy homes and will only rent spaces for the rest of their lives. Think about how they've turned most games into licence based "live services". That's what they're planning to do through student loans and pricing everyone out of being able to buy a home or even get a mortgage.
Atp with the unbearable and unmanageable costs of living for a reasonable level of lifestyle, repayment of loans, having no default and "a good credit" still doesn't get you much in life, so if you can't afford to pay them back, don't even bother. The vast majority of people are already priced out of being able to buy homes, put down payments on homes or even qualify for semi-decent rentals, so what's even the point of not defaulting on student loans? They've already gotten most people to a point where they have nothing to gain from paying back, and it's not like children at 18 even really understand or know what loans mean and how interest repayments work. Most people who took loans only pay interest so their loan doesn't even decrease for decades at a time, or won't decrease for decades.
If you've managed to secure a decent living already, I would say just default, or pay the absolute bare minimum and forget about being debt free. There's really no point. These people have created an unsustainable system and let capitalism eat itself. Why should you all keep paying for their fucking yachts and private islands?
I had student loans and I defaulted right after. Luckily I had the opportunity to escape the system entirely so eventually they had no choice but to call bad debt on my loans and they're no longer in the system. I have 0 credit, but honestly I'm 40+ and have created a life without needing credit at all. I know that's not possible for the vast majority of people, but the more we establish credit, the less we have for ourselves. My lifestyle can't be replicated by most people, but don't fall into the trap of believing that you'll ever be debt free. They're not going to let that happen.
America's future is a "rental" economy where they're already preparing to ensure that Gen Z can never buy homes and will only rent spaces for the rest of their lives. Think about how they've turned most games into licence based "live services". That's what they're planning to do through student loans and pricing everyone out of being able to buy a home or even get a mortgage.
Decentralization of control means there is nothing to revolt against. In the past, there was a king, or a group of nobles and you knew who controlled wealth.
Right now wealth is dispersed amongst mega corporations and shareholders. Many of the shareholders are the middle class and when the invest they basically hand over their control over to mega corporations who bundle shareholder ownership into their own control.
Most of us don't even know the names of the thousands of actual decision makers let alone know who to bring down.
We all pretend that governments have power and think that changing a government will shift the balance of power, but ultimately people have handed over their power to a decentralized system that simply runs itself with very visible controllers of policy, but we don't know who they exactly are. The government is made up of puppets on both sides and there's so many actual policy makers behind the scenes that we don't even know who's actually in control anymore. How many people are controlling what systems and where to even begin in terms of a direct line of attack. There's no primary controllers and we all like to pretend that a handful of billionnaires control everything, when in reality it's a large group of investment firms that are simply running on a system that we're all continuously contributing to running ourselves.
You have no head to cut. There can be no revolution. It's all an archaic pipe dream of heroes vs villians .. but with the way capitalism has shaped itself now most of us are unknowingly part of keeping capitalism alive.
America's future is a "rental" economy where they're already preparing to ensure that Gen Z can never buy homes and will only rent spaces for the rest of their lives. Think about how they've turned most games into licence based "live services". That's what they're planning to do through student loans and pricing everyone out of being able to buy a home or even get a mortgage.
Communism of the 40s-70s doesn't work anywhere in a vacuum unless there's similar support structures, or at least communism supportive populations globally since we live in a global village. No country can have communism in isolation because of competing interests on all sides so what we can hope for is a move towards reasonable financial policies that benefit the majority and bills of rights that uphold the rights of the minorities. The big problem is America's Constitution is seen as progressive, or is forced to interpreted as progressive while it has always been a center right and far right supportive document.I don't believe that's the "plan". I believe that the system adapts itself to the median voter. So if the median voter in the US is a boomer with a house, then rising housing prices was a good policy.
Of course it's all a ponzi scheme but I absolutely don't believe that Gen Z and Millennials will take it (the vision that you describe). Once the median voter changes, the "system" will change too. And no, more communism is not the change we need.
Although 1917 style revolution would probably be immensely popular with the youth today. Seizing property of the rich etc etc.
You Americans need to get boomers out of the office first!
Communism of the 40s-70s doesn't work anywhere in a vacuum unless there's similar support structures, or at least communism supportive populations globally since we live in a global village. No country can have communism in isolation because of competing interests on all sides so what we can hope for is a move towards reasonable financial policies that benefit the majority and bills of rights that uphold the rights of the minorities. The big problem is America's Constitution is seen as progressive, or is forced to interpreted as progressive while it has always been a center right and far right supportive document.
The US needs to get rid of the boomers *and* develop a Bill of Rights for universal application that cannot be tampered with by rogue Justices ... the likes of which we're seeing now. America is proving how their system works and it works to uphold conservative rights through an archaic document that can be interpreted to support fascist rights infringements.
I don't believe that's the "plan". I believe that the system adapts itself to the median voter. So if the median voter in the US is a boomer with a house, then rising housing prices was a good policy.
Of course it's all a ponzi scheme but I absolutely don't believe that Gen Z and Millennials will take it (the vision that you describe). Once the median voter changes, the "system" will change too. And no, more communism is not the change we need.
Although 1917 style revolution would probably be immensely popular with the youth today. Seizing property of the rich etc etc.
You Americans need to get boomers out of the office first!
The propaganda for a rent only future has literally hit the TVs here. There's several articles and fake news stories about this targeting Gen Z heavily. Some of us older folk who've experienced other forms of similar propaganda through our lives are picking up on it.
I just hope Gen Z remains as wise as it is right now.
There's also a simultaneous push to force people into "Tiny Homes" (rebranded Trailer Park/Mobile Home) which will recreate the entire Trailer Park scumlords all over the country for the new generation as well.
I can appreciate both sides of the argument.
That said, I will admit I have no (direct) skin in the game.
I also appreciate that people’s ignorance was taken advantage of. Promises were made which could not be guaranteed.
Of course, nothing in life ensures shifting into glide mode.
The propaganda and pressures were unrelenting. Both hope- and fear-based. So many said yes, and only a few saw what might result.
But they could not foresee the rug being pulled out from under everyone. No one could.
It’s a mess, that is for sure. Mess, as in, no easy answer. No answer period.
Wealth extraction always comes with a bill, and it is necessarily ugly.
It will be paid. The only question is by whom?
Ugh,
Ian