- MBTI
- enfp
- Enneagram
- -
'Morons' are educated that way, not born.
I agree with just about all of this. The only difference is that I'm not on the fence about the change in favor of the term "constitutional republic." I think reinforcing the idea that we're a republic more so than a democracy is a more accurate description.Well, the USA is a constitutional republic, as well as a representative democracy. So I'm kind of on the fence with this one.
Depends on how these ideas are actually discussed, but I find it hard to argue with the position that they are ideas that have at times influenced American politics, sometimes quite strongly.
Huh? Now that I find pretty baffling.
Pointless re-branding exercise.
'Morons' are educated that way, not born.
I was pleasantly surprised, actually, to hear that the board intends to include references to the Declaration's "laws of nature and of nature's god" within the textbooks. In fact, I think any authentic and truthful review of the founding of America ought to include a review of our country's political philosophy. Trying to understand the American republic without knowing anything about its intended purpose is like trying to teach students about physics while ignoring the field's basic underlying laws.Most of this stuff actually seems rather reasonable to me.
However, I do have a problem with the god refrences. That should not be included as a lesson or idea. Those do not belong in there to be taught as the basis of things. Also the whole shushing of the religous freedom bit. Mind you, that wasn't the entire reason the country was founded, in fact it was only a small part.
At least they aren't trying to squelsh evolution.
Sieg heil... environmental studies show otherwise.Some are born, some should not have been.
By the same argument, please review the native beliefs of the Indians, and run the country as it ought to be. Why do everyone of you worship some founding fathers so much? Can't you see it's all shallow propaganda, and in reality they have been nothing like what is narrated by historians?Trying to understand the American republic without knowing anything about its intended purpose is like trying to teach students about physics while ignoring the field's basic underlying laws.
By the same argument, please review the native beliefs of the Indians, and run the country as it ought to be. Why do everyone of you worship some founding fathers so much? Can't you see it's all shallow propaganda, and in reality they have been nothing like what is narrated by historians?
I have no argument, so it's not to be validated. Feel free to believe in imaginary heroes forever. Every country has them and they are all fairy tales, because real people are not like that. Hope that clarifies that it is not about founding fathers; but equally applied to Buddha, Muhammad, Jesus or Till Eulenspiegel.
Rational = emotional
Neuroscience.
'Morons' are educated that way, not born.
In all instances? Or just in instances where a deeper description of the government is being discussed? Probably the latter. The wording here is pretty clear. The TBoE is adding counterpoint views, not abolishing the opposition.• Struck the word "democratic" in references to the form of U.S. government and replaced it with "constitutional republic."
They added the ability to discuss this topic? Unbelievable!• Added references to "laws of nature and nature's God" in lessons about major political ideas.
This makes no sense to me, as conservatives would be very inclined to keep this subject very alive. I'd like to see the specific lessons that where rejected. The word 'Rejected' also presumes that these lessons hadn't been added yet, but were proposed. Otherwise, they'd have used the word 'Removed', like below.• Rejected lessons about why the United States was founded on the principle of religious freedom.
Again, I'd be willing to bet that these changes are situational and specific... but how dare these bastards use our educational system propaganda to interrupt our plan of growing an entire generation of liberal voters, and supplant it with their own!?• Removed most references to "capitalism," "capitalist" and "free market," because conservatives said they had a "negative connotation." Instead, "free enterprise" will be used when referring to the U.S. economic system.
The equation is imprecise, and not exactly what I needed for the discussion anyway. Consider it bad expression. However, the studies about the crucial importance of emotion to reasoning are fact. Thanks for the corrections by you and Satya, I will edit my post.
If you actually believe this, you're proving the point that politicos intend to use the educational system to grow new crops of voters. This is a battle over how these kids might vote when they get older, and not about making sure they have the best education we can provide. Makes me sick, really.
...
...or maybe, just maybe, because these people are conservative, this is the truth as they understand it?
Actually, I am one ofI don't think Nik was saying that the country should be run a certain way just because it was originally set up that way, I think he was just saying that to fully understand how the system got to be what it is today and why it works the way it does you have to understand where it came from, and therefore why it was originally set up the way it was.