It took as long as you signing on here. Now get to it. Get to illumining. Hurry! Before you are unable to type as your fingers turn to lizard's claws.I'm new here and was wondering: How long does it take in a discussion such as this, for the topic of the Illuminati to show up?
I don't know why he rebelled, Quinlan. Good question. Maybe because he wanted humans to worship him instead of God? I don't know.
Now please excuse me as I go shapechange into a reptile.
-EpicurusIs God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?
He noticed God's love of human beings, despite the fact that we're clear fuckups. He was also jealous of our free will. Angels were beings of servitude, created to follow God's commands without question. Lucifer began questioning. And, due to his rebellion, was sent into complete disconnection with God in a fiery pit, along with the other angels Lucifer convinced to rebel. 1/3 of all the angels were cast to Hell, along with God's Right Hand: Lucifer.Why did Satan decide to rebel? Didn't he get a bit pissy and jealous about god creating humans?
He noticed God's love of human beings, despite the fact that we're clear fuckups. He was also jealous of our free will. Angels were beings of servitude, created to follow God's commands without question. Lucifer began questioning. And, due to his rebellion, was sent into complete disconnection with God in a fiery pit, along with the other angels Lucifer convinced to rebel. 1/3 of all the angels were cast to Hell, along with God's Right Hand: Lucifer.
Either way, Lucifer is understood as being another name of the same "Evil" entity that caused human beings to fall from grace.
Edit for VindurNótt: That argument is invalid in the face of free will.
Free will is either showing inability (he CAN"T take away free will) or unwillingness (not willing to face the cost of doing away with evil).Edit for VindurNótt: That argument is invalid in the face of free will.
Angels never had the temptations we have to deal with. They knew God, so why question if the answer is right there? Angels had free will, as all of his other creations- They just didn't have the same circumstances as human beings. They had God right there in front of them. If the questions are answered and the temptation not there, why fight? It wasn't until one angel decided "Wow. Why do I have to constantly answer to God?"So why would god create a jealous and rebellious being to be his servant? Why didn't he make angels more accepting and truly unquestioning? Did god fail somehow in the creation of Lucifer?
Maybe so. Would you rather have beings follow you willingly or have a bunch of automatons? The conclusion that I've come to is that the Christian God is a narcissist. And, well, it's stated in the bible "Do not have any other gods before me; for I am a jealous God"I don't understand why a god so good would create such an evil and powerful being, does he like to see us tested?
Tell me: Would you rather have free will?If he truly loved us why would he test us this way, why doesn't he love us unconditionally? Is he that petty?
See above.Free will is either showing inability (he CAN"T take away free will) or unwillingness (not willing to face the cost of doing away with evil).
Evils in this world don't exist due to Satan or Lucifer or any of that bullshit. They exist due to human choices.
You're talking about religion and asking for an unbiased opinion?? the only one you'll get is that its all just silly superstition, and that its unimportant. The Abramists created the idea of lucifer, and they said he's evil, so thats about as much as your getting (beyond the satanist ideas which say that lucifer represents what the church calls evil, but really aren't all that bad).From what I am reading....Who exactly says that Lucifer is evil?
Is it only the word of the religion that says that he is truly evil right? Couldn't they be considered just a little bit biased?
So, what is the independent third party that says Lucifer is the source of evil?
It's up to you to really decide if Lucifer is truly "Evil." One would think that the tempter of man with the specific goal of separating one from God would be "Evil."From what I am reading....Who exactly says that Lucifer is evil?
Not really. If you believe in the entire creation story, then one is led to believe he's "Evil." Remember, he's the tempter of man. He doesn't care for you or your soul. You're pretty much a means of Satan to say "Fuck you" to God.Is it only the word of the religion that says that he is truly evil right? Couldn't they be considered just a little bit biased?
... I don't really think there can be a "Third party" when we're talking about specific beliefs of a specific religion.So, what is the independent third party that says Lucifer is the source of evil?
Thank you. I'm not actually a theist. I've just spent so much time thinking about religion that I've spent a lot of time researching the Bible and other religious texts. Most of my time as a teen was spent figuring out religion. I never really searched for a reason to not believe, as much as I searched for answers to believe. I've yet to convince myself of God's existence.Very interesting answers PP, I will have a think about them.
Lucifer had it plainly spelled out. Unfortunately, even though one might have all the answers present, pride can still get in the way of love. Also remember: No human being is God. We can ask all the questions we want but the only real answers are speculation; an attempt to see from the eyes of the infinite.I have never heard it put this way, interesting. One thing that bothers me is if god wants us to follow him, why doesnt he spell it out plainly for us? What's so special about faith?
George Bush?! Good to see you on the forums, I suppose you've got a bit of spare time these days.
So why doesn't god just destroy Satan?