- MBTI
- INFJ
- Enneagram
- 9
So to summarize, you're saying that we use Fe to gain some kind of control of our Ni and to avoid from it to go overload of all the information that it gathers?
This is probably why so many of us are all messed up too, a million ideas conflicting with their moral implications, crammed into our heads.I think it is more of a case that Ni can frequently tell us truths that our Fe refuses to accept. It can be very conflicting. A classic example would be Luke Skywalker realizing that Darth Vader is his father. His Ni knew it was true. His Fe refused to accept it.
Ni works very seamlessly with Te because both of these functions are open to things being the way that they are, no matter how they are. Ni can be very antagonistic to Fe, and by all accounts shouldn't be able to work with it. Even Carl Jung supposedly stated at one point in his development of the theory that there was no such thing as INFJs because he believed these two functions couldn't coexist with Ni being supported by Fe as Ni sees what is and Fe believes in what should be. And yet, here we are. Apparently he wasn't too far from the truth though, seeing as INFJs are the rarest of the types... probably for this very reason.
This is probably why so many of us are all messed up too, a million ideas conflicting with their moral implications, crammed into our heads.
Okay, I have to ask, don't Se and Ni compete with each other? So how is it that developing Se will speed up my Ni? Or will it just speed up my brain by having the faster function, Ni not being part of this at all?
I am actually quite similar to this. There is a physical component to it.
Really, I just can internally tell them apart. Ni stuff is very independent of feelings and thoughts. They are simply ideas and information that will appear out of nowhere with no promting or conscious thought. I also have very low/unused Fi so I often don't get internal feelings that would be similar to it (they are very Fe based), so because of it is easy for me to distinguish these processes.
I think it is more of a case that Ni can frequently tell us truths that our Fe refuses to accept. It can be very conflicting. A classic example would be Luke Skywalker realizing that Darth Vader is his father. His Ni knew it was true. His Fe refused to accept it.
Ni works very seamlessly with Te because both of these functions are open to things being the way that they are, no matter how they are. Ni can be very antagonistic to Fe, and by all accounts shouldn't be able to work with it. Even Carl Jung supposedly stated at one point in his development of the theory that there was no such thing as INFJs because he believed these two functions couldn't coexist with Ni being supported by Fe as Ni sees what is and Fe believes in what should be. And yet, here we are. Apparently he wasn't too far from the truth though, seeing as INFJs are the rarest of the types... probably for this very reason.
This is probably why so many of us are all messed up too, a million ideas conflicting with their moral implications, crammed into our heads.
Very likely.
Is there any way to deal with this?
Develop Se.
Seriously, it rocks!
Okay, I have to ask, don't Se and Ni compete with each other? So how is it that developing Se will speed up my Ni? Or will it just speed up my brain by having the faster function, Ni not being part of this at all?
It is a little more difficult for INFJs to develop Se, but it is well worth it, because it allows us to simulate Ne and even Si.
And not walk into things so much I'd imagine.
And not walk into things so much I'd imagine.
EEEEEEEE So interesting!Ni and Se are actually mated pairs. Ni requires Se in order to fully function. Ni processes the information taken in by Se, and then seeks the patterns with that information. When Se is dominant over Ni, Ni is the natural back up for Se, allowing a person to make sense of all the information they are absorbing.
Until a person develops both processes in any pair well enough to allow them to work in tandem, those preferences will tend to compete with one another. For example, for INFJs the Fe and Ti can be antagonistic while developing Ti, but once they are developed well enough they can begin to work in tandem and can simulate both Fi and Te. It is a little more difficult for INFJs to develop Se, but it is well worth it, because it allows us to simulate Ne and even Si.
I've asked this question on various typology forums, and I still can't get a sensible and logical response as to how you discriminate between a "feeling" and a "hunch/intuition"?
When you gather information from the environment, do you respond between what you felt, or what you actually intuit? To me, (Fi) and (Ni) are quite the similar process and this has been one of those things that has made me doubt between being a dominant feeler or intuitive.
For example, whenever I get a premonition or a future-related revelation(don't freak out, most of them don't come true ), I'm not sure if it's coming from a feeling that something is about to happen, or if it's my intuition that is telling me so.
What do you guys think?
(practice --> memorizing amounts --> do it automatically)
I work at a deli and I spend many hours a day serving customers, which means filling orders for sliced meats in exact gram measurements. Of course we take the meat and put it on a scale, but I've noticed that I have the uncanny ability to hit the mark (sometimes the exact amount, like 200 grams) on the first try with super speed and no real thought. I just grab and go.
I was thinking surely since this is a fast task (I move really quickly this task and with pretty good precision) and I don't really think about what amount I'm grabbing - I just grab whats right - maybe this is an example of Se? Then I looked into it deeper and while the initial grab might be without thought, (maybe, there certainly is no internal dialogue until after I grabbed), I can "feel" if what I grabbed was too much or too little, and thats certainly intuition (I am also usually right). I usually get the feeling though only in the cases where I didn't get it right on the first grab though, like it's only giving my input if the first function use messes up.
So what is this? Ni working alone, Se working first with Ni backing it up, or Ni and Se working in perfect sync?