- MBTI
- Meh
- Enneagram
- Meh
What's the point of this? How does it relate to a grammatical correct?[o_q];222822 said:And losers of a race have lost because the winners didn't let them win. Truth
What's the point of this? How does it relate to a grammatical correct?[o_q];222822 said:And losers of a race have lost because the winners didn't let them win. Truth
Those are all good sentiments except for the fact that INFJs can be some of the most utterly judgemental MBTI group that I know of.
What is a grammatical correct?What's the point of this? How does it relate to a grammatical correct?
And losers of a race have lost because the winners didn't let them win. Truth[o_q];222844 said:What is a grammatical correct?
touche! XDAnd losers of a race have lost because the winners didn't let them win. Truth
HUH?And losers of a race have lost because the winners didn't let them win. Truth
I was quoting Mr Monocle from an earlier one of his posts. I wasn't being serious in the least bit.HUH?
False.
Some people are just better at things than others.
All humans are NOT created equal.
We should be equal ethically, morally and politically, but even that fails.
We're certainly not equals when it comes to abilities.
Life is cruel that way.
Although I find this both admirable and amicable.I was quoting Mr Monocle from an earlier one of his posts. I wasn't being serious in the least bit.
I agree that we're not all equals when it comes to abilities, and some people are naturally more abled than others in some aspects.
I agree that life is cruel in that way, but we also have the ability (seeing as we're conscious about it) to make life more fair, and embrace different abilities as such. We're all different, but we're also all human. It's something we share, and something we should embrace. If we embrace our differences, rather than just accept that some are better than others, we might make progress in creating a more level playing field.
I agree that a world like that would be a bad thing. I'm not trying to say that everyone should get an equal share of the pie, or that everyone should have their chicken-scratch drawings be called masterpieces. There always will be better runners, and better artists.Although I find this both admirable and amicable.
It's this very mentality that is creating the world of clones we are now witnessing.
No longer are the exceptional rewarded for being exceptional, But rather standards are lowered so people don't feel bad.
This does not allow for the greatness of people to come to the forefront.
This destroys critical thinking, This destroys creativity, This destroys innovation.
If I am not tall anough,fast enough, strong enough or talented enough and someone still gives me my cookie anyway, where is my incentive to grow and adapt. How are my innovation and creativity being challenged??
I agree totally.. Social skills are not considered as highly as they should be. It's how so many decent people end up in therapy with low self esteems and such.I agree that a world like that would be a bad thing. I'm not trying to say that everyone should get an equal share of the pie, or that everyone should have their chicken-scratch drawings be called masterpieces. There always will be better runners, and better artists.
What I am trying to advocate however, is that every single person has special abilities, but at times these abilities can be disregarded as pointless or moot. For example, a kid that is extremely social in school. They might not be the fastest runner, best math student, or prodigy musician, even though that's what they're taught is important.
These kids bring in a social kindness that isn't always given room to grow. They're good at making connections with people, and networking. Perhaps they are good problem solvers in personal conflicts? The average school doesn't give them room to grow these abilities, and often times overtly-social behavior can be frowned upon (granted it also can be disruptive). However, if these children had opportunities to strengthen their given abilities, they might turn out to be amazing counselor/interventionalists.
My point is that everyone has different natural abilities, but some people's are 'more important' than others. What I'm advocating is embracing all of the abilities for what they are, not making everyone the next Michael Jordan.
[o_q];222718 said:Why are their starving people? Is it because we don't feed them?
[o_q];222822 said:And losers of a race have lost because the winners didn't let them win. Truth
Race you to 10,000 posts!There is certainly no simple explanation. I am pretty sure it wasn't a question box they checked when being born.
Win vs Loss is subjective, I am disappointed. Some people don't exist to "win." Some people have no interest in races.
By the way, I hope that I didn't come across as implying that INFJs are superior or that only INFJs should exist. That'd be boring, and of course each type has their own good and bad...but I was simply saying what if people could have the loving part of [most] INFJs..I don't understand how people are happy if they're just going after their own dreams and stuff, and don't care about any companions T_T
If you guys want to be proven wrong so badly, explain the whole PAX thing to me.So very true.
But we really, sincerely do want people to prove us wrong.
It's just we are right so very, very often.
But seriously...why can't we just all love each other?
Imagine a world of INFJs. Now that would be world peace right thar.
Why do we need to judge each other?