But what do people actually hate about the Nazis? Their health care and public works programs, or the whole Holocaust and invading most of Europe thing?
And which of these is a result of right wing nationalism and militarism as opposed to left wing 'socialist' policy?
And the right has plenty of opinions/laws regarding things like homosexuality and abortion... they're not at all about non-interference in civil rights issues.
And just in case you bring up gun control-- the Nazis actually eased their restrictions on gun control when they came to power:
http://www.salon.com/2013/01/11/stop_talking_about_hitler/
The Treaty of Versailles made gun ownership in Germany difficult because they weren't supposed to be militarized-- which is why Nazi propaganda films have soldiers carrying shovels instead of guns. It's because they were forbidden... at least until Hitler came to power and made Germany a military power again.
You should read your own article it says that Hitler DID restrict gun ownership of the people he wanted to oppress for example the jews
The USA government, which is currently being controlled by the central bankers, is currently trying disarm the people it wants to oppress: the american people
The article says the jews wouldn't have been able to stop the nazis persecuting them even if they had weapons. That might be true becuase the jews were a tiny minority in germany at that time, although if i had been a jew in germany at that time i would still have wanted the option of being able to defend myself
The situation in the US is totally different because the US public is the majority made up of people of all faiths or non faith.
If you are a US soldier and you are ordered to arrest large numbers of your own population are you more likely to refuse the order if they are armed? I'd say yes
So this isn't about the public being able to defeat the US military....they don't need to defeat the military. They just need to dissuade most of the soldiers in the military from oppressing them
And many soldiers WILL REFUSE TO VIOLENTLY CONTROL THEIR OWN COUNTRYMEN. Its worth baring in mind that revolutionaries are often ex soldiers
The weapons are a deterrent from the bankers trying to declare a national emergencey, impose martial law and then arrest and detain any political opponents (like hitler did)
If the weapons were taken off the public the banker cabal would tell sections of the military that they were to arrest certain people. But the soldiers being told to carry out the arrests would be told that the arrests were isolated incidents and that they were detaining ''terrorists''. However they would not be isloated incidents....they would be going on right across the US
This would be much harder and probably impossible if the citizens could create an armed stand off with the soldiers sent to arrest them as the soldiers WOULD NOT WANT TO OPEN FIRE ON THEIR OWN PEOPLE. This would lead to a questioning of orders, a stalling of the process and the truth would then go widely public that the arrests were extensive
The soldiers would realise they were being lied to and the whole situation would collapse leading to a backlash against the banking cabal from not only the citizens but also the betrayed and lied to soldiery
