In response to the OP, I believe that women of today in the U.S. are definitely able to be independent and self-sufficient, traits which weren't necessarily encouraged, say, fifty years ago. In my opinion, if a woman wants to graduate high school and become a housewife, providing her husband is able to financially support this lifestyle, more power to her. I also believe that is is capable, although much more difficult, for a woman to have children and a full-time career. It seems to me that, at some point, either family or job will suffer if some kind of arrangements are made, preferably in favor of the family over career. For myself, having decided years ago that I have neither the temperament nor any desire at all for children, I also have no problem if a woman chooses marriage, but not motherhood, as well as a career. All three paths have their pros and cons, and I believe the necessary decision is based on the individual. Women who have children and who choose, or prefer to remain single, seem to be much more accepted than several decades ago. I believe that this may be one of the most difficult choices, as raising one child is difficult enough with a stable couple, to say nothing of multiple children by one woman with very few or no resources. If there is a wage gap between what men and women earn for the same work, they should earn the same pay, making allowances, of course, for skill and experience. I also personally believe that every woman, regardless of religion, should have access to birth control, which would involve the evolevement of several organized religions, in which women are almost always marginalized in some form. So, now that I've thrown out more possible controversy, I'll post this and see where the discussion goes, if anywhere.
Chenoa