"
They are calling it the potty cover-up of the 2017 inauguration.
The Associated Press reported on Friday that workers preparing the Capitol grounds and National Mall for the inauguration of Mr. Trump have altered the portable toilets being set up to accommodate attendees, apparently to spare the ego of the president-elect.
The toilets are provided by the equipment rental company Don’s Johns. But on Friday, a Capitol employee was photographed covering the company’s logo with blue masking tape, and later, dozens of the porta-johns appeared to have been altered that way.
The company’s chief executive said he had no idea why his logo had been covered, telling the AP “we’re proud to have our name on the units.”
"
They are calling it the potty cover-up of the 2017 inauguration.
The Associated Press reported on Friday that workers preparing the Capitol grounds and National Mall for the inauguration of Mr. Trump have altered the portable toilets being set up to accommodate attendees, apparently to spare the ego of the president-elect.
The toilets are provided by the equipment rental company Don’s Johns. But on Friday, a Capitol employee was photographed covering the company’s logo with blue masking tape, and later, dozens of the porta-johns appeared to have been altered that way.
The company’s chief executive said he had no idea why his logo had been covered, telling the AP “we’re proud to have our name on the units.”
"
They are calling it the potty cover-up of the 2017 inauguration.
The Associated Press reported on Friday that workers preparing the Capitol grounds and National Mall for the inauguration of Mr. Trump have altered the portable toilets being set up to accommodate attendees, apparently to spare the ego of the president-elect.
The toilets are provided by the equipment rental company Don’s Johns. But on Friday, a Capitol employee was photographed covering the company’s logo with blue masking tape, and later, dozens of the porta-johns appeared to have been altered that way.
The company’s chief executive said he had no idea why his logo had been covered, telling the AP “we’re proud to have our name on the units.”
OMG. Seriously? He actually entered a doorway first before his wife as President.
Well fuck. I'm sure Obama NEVER did that. It's time to impeach this bitch.
Drs. David Himmelstein and Steffie Woolhandler, both professors of public health at the City University of New York’s Hunter College and lecturers in medicine at Harvard Medical School, both agree that even under the most conservative estimates, getting rid of President Obama’s signature healthcare reform law will result in 43,956 deaths every year.
Abolishing minimum coverage standards for insurance policies would leave insurers and employers free to cut coverage for preventive and reproduction-related care. Allowing interstate insurance sales probably would cause a race to the bottom, with skimpy plans that emanate from lightly regulated states becoming the norm. Block granting Medicaid would leave poor patients at the mercy of state officials, many of whom have shown little concern for the health of the poor. A Medicare voucher program (with the value of the voucher tied to overall inflation rather than more rapid medical inflation) would worsen the coverage of millions of seniors, a problem that would be exacerbated by the proposed ban on full coverage under Medicare supplement policies.
The unofficial National Park Service account started six hours ago by reposting the Badlands tweets that had been deleted. It’s since continued posting all the climate change data it can find, and it’s been documenting Trump’s strange attempts at cracking down on the official accounts.
I think I am a bit more quick then you give me credit for.
I understand the intent. Whats funny is that media blackouts are common place. Now though, your fake news outlets are making it seem like something far out of the ordinary in an effort to push their agenda. You know this already though, refusing to acknowledge what are now proven facts in this regard.
What I mean by my statement is that "unofficial" does not in anyway speak for the agency. If a media outlet reports on any information derived for this source, they are reporting fake news. Thats about as simple as I can make it.
Also, anyone proving information to this source could potentially be viewed as providing classified government information to a non-secure nonofficial site. We know what that means dont we?
I think I am a bit more quick then you give me credit for.
I understand the intent. Whats funny is that media blackouts are common place. Now though, your fake news outlets are making it seem like something far out of the ordinary in an effort to push their agenda. You know this already though, refusing to acknowledge what are now proven facts in this regard.
What I mean by my statement is that "unofficial" does not in anyway speak for the agency. If a media outlet reports on any information derived for this source, they are reporting fake news. Thats about as simple as I can make it.
Also, anyone proving information to this source could potentially be viewed as providing classified government information to a non-secure nonofficial site. We know what that means dont we?
Nope.
Fake news...as opposed to “alternative facts”...what a joke.
We shall see who is on the right side of history...so far Trump is well on his way to getting impeached.
Not that I like Pence any more...but at least he doesn’t act like a 13 year old boy on Twitter.
Here’s some “fake” news for you...if you start believing that only Trump’s tweets are truth then you really have chugged down the Kool-aid.
The science community is attempting to save the data that proves all the climate change deniers are being gaslit.
Not just climate change, but environmental data of all sorts before the Trump admin. destroys the EPA and shuts off the NASA satellite specifically studying climate change.
We know what that means? Are we going to shoot them for treason EH?
Clarify for us...lock them up? Should me make an example of them you think?
"Yesterday, Donald Trump possibly committed a felony by inciting Vladimir Putin and the Russian government to hack an American citizen and release personal emails. It’s just the latest questionably illegal action by the Republican nominee for President, who has been sued over 3,500 times in his career, including 70 times since he kicked off his campaign.
In fact, two groups have threatened to sue him this week for refusing to pay for services rendered.
More chilling than even his potentially treasonous comments was his suggestion yesterday that, if he had the power, he would hack into the private communications of political opponents (and the Presidency would give him that power).
That’s terrifying. (and exactly what happened...hmmm? But all us more liberal types are all fooling ourselves.)
It’s also just the latest illegal or potentially illegal act in the life and career of Donald Trump. Here’s a taste of Donald Trump’s other illegal activities:
Hillary Clinton has been investigated and scrutinized for decades.
She’s endured years of partisan Congressional hearings, FBI investigations, and independent counsel probes.
Donald Trump can’t even handle the scrutiny of having one year of tax returns examined, in spite of his own hypocrisy about the release of personal records:
"
But yeah...that’s a lovely bubble you’ve encased yourself in.
Where are the tax returns he promised?
Where is this awesome healthcare he promised?
He’s going to tax goods from Mexico at 20% - who is going to eat that cost...the consumer...duh.
Trickle down economics at full volume isn’t going to enrich our society.
Privatize our schools, SS, and Medicare...great ideas...then they’ll be under the thumb of their shareholders.
But yeah...stick with your “Alternative facts....”, it’s working for you...
