- MBTI
- INFJ
- Enneagram
- 1w2 sx/so/sp
Oops, I ment to vote for andrew jackson, not thomas jefferson.
What Nixon did was a direct u-turn on what got him elected, don't bring Barack into this, just because more than one president has done uturns doesn't excuse any of them.
Perhaps crucially he gave the finger to the US system by bombing Cambodia without running is past congress - nothing short of shitting on democracy which America was supposedly trying to inject into that part of the world at the time. Congress wouldn't have given him the answer he wanted.
The arrest of Pinochet in London in the late 80's was what caused the US govt to release classified files on how Nixon and Kissinger duped everyone by issuing fake targets for US bombers in south Vietnam but then having them re-routed midflight to Cambodia - a neutral country..
He pledged to withdraw the US from Vietnam honourably, but there was no question of honour in it - it was all about image. They did not want to appear to simply 'withdraw', lest Russia and emerging China take it as a sign of weakness, so they resolved to bomb the fuck out the entire region and cause a final few months of bloodshed and chaos so they could pull out with the Russians and Chinese looking on thinking 'wow, those Yanks are still a force to be reckoned with'.
Opening up relations with China lol. China was on the rise and Nixon knew it; what other reason would a US president decide to open up 'relations' with a communist state other than because they saw them as a future threat. Political or social ideology plays NO role in the motives of heads of state. America would crush one communist state and back another. Nixons (and Kissingers) actions of that period embodied all that was rotten and corrupt with what the US system had become. But of course the layman simply can't fathom the ideological or moral treason being committed and simply thinks 'bombing Cambodia made sense cause there were north Vietnamese commies in it'.
Barack Obama, completely unqualified to rule, more so then Bush. His policies have been disastrous the amount of wealth the US has lost under his watch directly attributed to his policies is unbelievable.
by what definition? We've been in a deficit sense or before FDR.
Also why Nixion? What makes him worse then Clinton, ENFP Can be Shy.
Also why Nixion? What makes him worse then Clinton, ENFP Can be Shy.
Barack Obama, completely unqualified to rule, more so then Bush. His policies have been disastrous the amount of wealth the US has lost under his watch directly attributed to his policies is unbelievable.
Richard Nixon was proven to have unleashed the national security apparatus on his political foes. Clinton was proven to have gotten a blow job from a buxom 20 year old in the oval office. I realize that sexual infidelity is punishable by stoning in biblical law but as far as modern American jurisprudence is concerned Nixon's crimes were far more impeachable. ( tellingly it was Clinton who was impeached. )
Brother Barnabas, are you really suggesting that Clinton's indescretion's rivaled Nixon's?
Democrats in power= debt goes down
Republicans in power= debt goes down still but less sharply
Democrats in power= debt goes down
Republicans in power= debt starts to go up
Democrats in power= debt goes down
Republicans in power= debt goes up sharply
Democrats in power= debt goes down
Republicans in power=debt goes up
Democrats in power=debt starts to go down?
'A measure of a country's federal debt in relation to its gross domestic product (GDP). By comparing what a country owes and what it produces, the debt-to-GDP ratio indicates the country's ability to pay back its debt. The ratio is a coverage ratio on a national level.
This measure gives an idea of the ability of a country to make future payments on its debt. If a country were unable to pay its debt, it would default, which could cause a panic in the domestic and international markets. The higher the debt-to-GDP ratio, the less likely the country will pay its debt back, and the higher its risk of default.'
Why do people in the US keep voting Republican? Are they trying to bring down their own country?
Yes thats true the Republicans do love going to war
Excellent quote there. Preventative detention? Damn, that is a fucking totalitarian step.Obama along with Bush has pretty much fucked Americas economy over. Surely though, Bush has done more damage than Obama, but Obama is playing catchup.
Just recently he proposed a new law, Preventive Detention. What an awesome idea, arrest people for crimes they may commit. I don't see it happening, unless some kind of suprise terrorist attack happens, which calls for emergency actions, like the patriot act.
"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety,
deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin