Those are fair points I just don't think they address the the question that was asked about whether or not there is double standard in male female pornography habits mainly in those dealing with romantic genre fiction.
when something is an ethical problem, a "need" to do it does not avert, or balance out, or neutralise the nature of the ethical problem. a "need" for certain viewers to consume visual pornographic material, because they are "wired" to get turned on by such materials, does not eliminate the ethical concerns involved in the production of real action porn film - those ethical concerns remain inherent to the production process and the consumption economy of real action porn.
to be perfectly honest, i think there are viable cases to be made both for and against real action porn film production and consumption, and i think that real action porn presents a range of ethical dilemmas that cannot actually be legitimately resolved. but if people want to believe that there are no ethical dilemmas involved in real action porn, all they are doing is going "LA LA LA, I CANT HEAR YOU" in order to block out the other side of the debate with which it is not convenient for them to engage, because it conflicts with their "need" to consume porn. they are kidding themselves.
the reason why there is no double standard by comparison to romantic genre fiction, is because the same ethical dilemmas by which some people judge consumers of real action porn, are not applicable to romance genre fiction. it is not a double standard, it is a completely different range of ethical standards by which viewers of real action porn material are being judged that does not even remotely apply to fantasy fiction. these standards are to do with the consequences of porn acting on real live people who participate in it, what happens to them as individual actors in particular films, what happens to them as individual workers in an industry in which they have a very limited working potential, and also the consequences on our culture and society of these portrayals of sexual interaction that are dominant in porn production, how the extremely wide distribution combined with visual presentation of actors in those films affects general culture and sexual and emotional education of young viewers, and so on. this is a significant list of ethical questions, and these ethical standards have absolutely no relation to romance genre fiction, because romance genre fiction has no involvement in economies of paid sex work of any kind at all.
can we PLEASE stop discussing this now. its so off topic its ridiculous and im over it. i just dont want to talk about this anymore. do i have to start a new thread to get away from this topic? start a new thread if you want to talk about it so much.