Are we as a society being kept from discussing the big issues?

[video=youtube;JyoieET4WDE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JyoieET4WDE[/video]
 
This is a bit off topic- but there's been a few posts about people who knew significant information and were potentially assassinated because they were going to become public with it. However, there seems to be a lot of individuals around the internet bringing information to light about the NWO and such. Has there been any cases where they have been threatened? Blocked from reporting this knowledge? Assassinated? I'm just curious to know if the powers that be are letting them divulge this information with no consequences because they think no one will believe them, and that if they did intervene it would only lend credence to their cause.
 
Yes! You both seem to have your finger on the pulse of a lot of what's happening!

Its like building a puzzle

At first you have a few pieces that start to fit together, then after a while you start to see sections and before long you can make out the wider picture even though you don't have all the detail

I was curious to know if, in your opinion, something might happen at the olympics? Or if the location of the Olympics in Russia was meaningful. It seems like a very odd choice given the unrest there.

The unrest is due to the influence of outside forces

The saudi royal family, as it states in the dean henderson (a countryman of yours) article above are in cahoots with the NWO cabal. They provide cheap oil in return for protection and weaponry. they also control a lot of the terrorist groups in the middle east

Prince bandhar of saudi arabia threatened putin that if he didn't stop protecting syria then they would launch terror attacks in russia and we have been seeing that

Russia paid off its debts to the central bankers and is energy self sufficient with its own nationalised energy company gazprom so it isn't beholden to the bankers.

The situation is fluid though. there may have been deals behind the scenes since the threats were made regarding the situation in syria so i don't know if russia is still in the firing line to such an extent. I wouldn't be suprised if there is a terror strike of some sort though
 
The United States exists in two forms: The original united States that was in operation until 1860; a collection of sovereign Republics in the union. Under the original Constitution the States controlled the Federal Government; the Federal Government did not control the States and had limited authority.

The original united States of America has been usurped by a separate and different United States Corporation formed in 1871, which only controls the District of Columbia and it’s territories, and which is actually a corporation (the United States Corporation) that acts as our current government. The United States Corporation operates under Corporate/Commercial Law rather than Common/Private Law. In the original Constitution and Declaration of Independence, it refers to “these united States”. The word “united” was an adjective describing the noun States. That is why the lower case on united. When the United States Corporation was formed in 1871, the united was changed to United because the United States as a corporation was now a noun.

The original Constitution was never removed; it has simply been dormant since 1871. It is still intact to this day. This fact was made clear by Supreme Court Justice Marshall Harlan (Downes v. Bidwell, 182, U.S. 244 1901) by giving the following dissenting opinion: “Two national governments exist; one to be maintained under the Constitution, with all its restrictions; the other to be maintained by Congress outside and Independently of that Instrument.”

http://www.republicoftheunitedstates.org/what-is-the-republic/history/
 
[FONT=&quot]Julian Websdale ~ The Crown Empire And The City Of London Corporation[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]WakeUpWorld[/FONT][FONT=&quot] November 5 2013[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]http://www.shiftfrequency.com/julian-websdale-the-crown-empire-and-the-city-of-london-corporation/[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT][FONT=&quot]World politics today is governed by the Vatican, but also by the Crown Empire. The modern world of so-called Western Civilization began at the end of the 17th century with the blossoming of the British Empire. That empire actually began several hundred years earlier with the establishment of the City of London, which is now an 800-year corporation that controls finance from an entity called ‘The Crown’. This entity is the creator and controller of the Bank of England, the US Federal Reserve, the World Bank (IMF – International Monetary Fund), The European Union, and various cartels and corporations across the earth.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]The Crown Identity is kept most secret, and The Crown Bank of England took and assumed control of the United States during the Roosevelt Administration (1901-1909) when its agents, who were really Crown agents (J. P. Morgan), took over 25% of American business.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]The Crown has never been the King or Queen of England since the establishment of the corporate body, but the British Monarchy is a figurehead for The Crown, rules parliament in Great Britain and has authority over the Prime Ministers through a Vatican knighthood called the Order of the Garter. The Crown, however, is not the King or Queen of England – they are an established monarchy of the corporate body.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]The Crown is the directorate of the corporation, and Great Britain is ruled by The Crown, the City of London which controls the Bank of England – a private corporation. There is a private state existing in Britain within the centre of London. This City, located in the heart of Greater London, became a sovereign-state in 1694 when King William III of Orange privatised the Bank of England, and turned it over to the Vatican banksters who today rule the financial world.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]The City/The Crown Corporation is not subject to British Law; it has its own courts, its own laws, its own flag, its own police force – exactly like the Vatican city state and Washington DC Columbia. The Crown Corporation is also separate from the Metropolitan city; its police drive red police cars and their uniforms are different from the Metropolitan Police.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Also, The Crown in London houses the privatised Bank of England and Lloyd’s of London, the London Stock Exchange, and all British Banks. It also houses the branch offices of 385 foreign banks, 70 US banks, as well as Fleet Street newspapers and publishing monopolies. It controls the world media and world intelligence. It is out of The Crown City of London, the headquarters of British Freemasonry overseen by the British Monarchy and the Duke of Kent, that World Freemasonry is governed. This includes the Grand Orient Masonic Order and the Washington DC Scottish Rite.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]In 1945 the Bank of England was nationalised by the Labour Government, and is allegedly no longer a private bank, although it governs the US Federal Reserve. It is ruled over by the Rothschilds, who are bankers for the Pope – guardians of the Vatican Treasury.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]The City of London also has its own Lord Mayor, different from the current Mayor, who has the power in The Crown Corporation. When the Queen wishes to conduct business in the City, she is met by the Lord Mayor at Temple Bar. Temple Bar and their associate franchises come from what is called the Four Inns of the Temples of Court – the Inner Temple and the Middle Temple. The logo of the Inner Temple is a white horse on the sunburst seal of the Jesuit Order. The white horse is a symbol of the British Empire / Order of the Garter / Crown Corporation, and is the same white horse which is the symbol of the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations). The white horse is a Jesuit symbol – Pegasus. It is the Jesuit Order that governs the Honourable Society of the Inner Temple. The Inner Temple is the core group that governs the City of London Corporation.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]The whole Earth is governed by The Crown, through Crown Colonies which belong to The City – The Crown Empire. It governs Africa and still governs China and India. The colonies of the Earth are really just Crown Colonies – The United States of America are states of The Crown.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]This being said, however, it is vitally important to remember the following. The Crown Empire uses commercial law (aka international maritime law, or law of contracts) as its means of control. This law does not apply to sovereign, free men and women.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Your name, when spelt out in all capital letters – as in JULIAN WEBSDALE – is a corporation, a trust set up by the government through the treasury department at your birth. Every time a child is born, a corporation/trust is created using his or her name in all capital letters. They do this because governments are corporations and they operate under commercial law, the law of contracts. The laws passed by governments only apply to corporations and not to living, breathing, flesh and blood sovereign-free men and women spelt in upper-lower or all lower case, as with Julian Websdale, or julian websdale. The living, breathing sovereign man and woman is subject to common law, not the commercial law introduced by governments through legislation.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Source[/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_IB15IE1JC0[/FONT][FONT=&quot] [October 2013][/FONT]
 
The United States exists in two forms: The original united States that was in operation until 1860; a collection of sovereign Republics in the union. Under the original Constitution the States controlled the Federal Government; the Federal Government did not control the States and had limited authority.

The original united States of America has been usurped by a separate and different United States Corporation formed in 1871, which only controls the District of Columbia and it’s territories, and which is actually a corporation (the United States Corporation) that acts as our current government. The United States Corporation operates under Corporate/Commercial Law rather than Common/Private Law. In the original Constitution and Declaration of Independence, it refers to “these united States”. The word “united” was an adjective describing the noun States. That is why the lower case on united. When the United States Corporation was formed in 1871, the united was changed to United because the United States as a corporation was now a noun.

The original Constitution was never removed; it has simply been dormant since 1871. It is still intact to this day. This fact was made clear by Supreme Court Justice Marshall Harlan (Downes v. Bidwell, 182, U.S. 244 1901) by giving the following dissenting opinion: “Two national governments exist; one to be maintained under the Constitution, with all its restrictions; the other to be maintained by Congress outside and Independently of that Instrument.”

http://www.republicoftheunitedstates.org/what-is-the-republic/history/

Does this mean the Corporation is running the US as a business and for profit, rather than as a country? (I know to me it seems that way...but it would make sense if it was because it's a corporation of a government). This suggests even more that the President is just a figure head, and is the leader of the national government under the Constitution...this is very interesting!
 
This is a bit off topic- but there's been a few posts about people who knew significant information and were potentially assassinated because they were going to become public with it. However, there seems to be a lot of individuals around the internet bringing information to light about the NWO and such. Has there been any cases where they have been threatened? Blocked from reporting this knowledge? Assassinated? I'm just curious to know if the powers that be are letting them divulge this information with no consequences because they think no one will believe them, and that if they did intervene it would only lend credence to their cause.

There's simply a tidal wave of information. They can't attack individuals it would have no effect

The only effective measures they can take are to control the internet itself. This they are trying to do

They tried with PIPA,ACTA,SOPA & CISPA but the public were switched on enough to protest these and they were dropped so now the cabal are trying again but in secret this time with the TPP mentioned above

Also individual governments are bringing in filters under the excuse of trying to control pornography. For example the UK, which many people around the world probably think is quite a free country, is bringing in a filter that will block people from looking at esoteric websites; this is becaue they don't want people understanding things on an occult level

They want people to perceive reality on the level of the basic narratives they weave in the mainstream corporate media for example that the US is fighting to spread 'democracy' around the world or that there is a clash of cultures between the west and islam or they just want people fixating on idols like beiber or cyrus
 
Last edited:
Does this mean the Corporation is running the US as a business and for profit, rather than as a country? (I know to me it seems that way...but it would make sense if it was because it's a corporation of a government). This suggests even more that the President is just a figure head, and is the leader of the national government under the Constitution...this is very interesting!

The US is run as a corporation by the city of london corporation. All of their dominions are run under ADMIRALTY LAW. They require us to register our children after their birth so that we give them a corporate straw man identity which can then be held legally responsible under their corporate system please watch the following 2 clips to get more of an idea

I don't think its so much about 'profit' as control

[video=youtube;ME7K6P7hlko]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ME7K6P7hlko[/video]

Here is a US citizen refusing to bow to the US court system; he stands as a soverign free man

[video=youtube;06VzxxDTnB8]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06VzxxDTnB8[/video]
 
Last edited:
There's simply a tidal wave of information. They can't attack individuals it would have no effect

The only effective measures they can take are to control the internet itself. This they are trying to do

They tried with PIPA,ACTA,SOPA & CISPA but the public were switched on enough to protest these and they were dropped so now the cabal are trying again but in secret this time with the TPP mentioned above

Also individual governments are bringing in filters under the excuse of trying to control pornography. For example the UK, which many people around the world probably think is quite a free country, is bringing in a filter that will blcok people from looking at esoteric websites; this is becaue they don't want people understanding things on an occult level

They want people to perceive reality on the level of the basic narratives they weave in the mainstream corporate media for example that the US is fighting to spread 'democracy' around the world or that there is a clash of cultures between the west and islam or they just want people fixating on idols like beiber or cyrus

And they use things like inciting news articles that porn is bad for our health, encourages violence against women in youth, etc., and then couple that with violent public events that suggest they are a product of things like porn. The public is then convinced (because we're like lemmings), and doesn't fight against it- and ignores the larger picture of how their rights are being violated....It sounds so simple, and yet it happens all the time and we're too blind to it. Even now I'm like "that's just silly to think that"- but it's because I've been so programmed to think that the government is working in our best interest- when it's not.
 
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-federal-reserve-cartel-freemasons-and-the-house-of-rothschild/25179

In 1789 Alexander Hamilton became the first Treasury Secretary of the United States. Hamilton was one of many Founding Fathers who were Freemasons. He had close relations with the Rothschild family which owns the Bank of England and leads the European Freemason movement. George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, John Jay, Ethan Allen, Samuel Adams, Patrick Henry, John Brown and Roger Sherman were all Masons.
hamilton.gif

Andrew Hamilton

Roger Livingston helped Sherman and Franklin write the Declaration of Independence. He gave George Washington his oaths of office while he was Grand Master of the New York Grand Lodge of Freemasons. Washington himself was Grand Master of the Virginia Lodge. Of the General Officers in the Revolutionary Army, thirty-three were Masons. This was highly symbolic since 33rd Degree Masons become Illuminated. [1]
Populist founding fathers led by John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison and Thomas Paine- none of whom were Masons- wanted to completely severe ties with the British Crown, but were overruled by the Masonic faction led by Washington, Hamilton and Grand Master of the St. Andrews Lodge in Boston General Joseph Warren, who wanted to “defy Parliament but remain loyal to the Crown”. St. Andrews Lodge was the hub of New World Masonry and began issuing Knights Templar Degrees in 1769. [2]
warren1.jpg

General Joseph Warren
All US Masonic lodges are to this day warranted by the British Crown, whom they serve as a global intelligence and counterrevolutionary subversion network. Their most recent initiative is the Masonic Child Identification Program (CHIP). According to Wikipedia, the CHIP programs allow parents the opportunity to create a kit of identifying materials for their child, free of charge. The kit contains a fingerprint card, a physical description, a video, computer disk, or DVD of the child, a dental imprint, and a DNA sample.
The First Continental Congress convened in Philadelphia in 1774 under the Presidency of Peyton Randolph, who succeeded Washington as Grand Master of the Virginia Lodge. The Second Continental Congress convened in 1775 under the Presidency of Freemason John Hancock. Peyton’s brother William succeeded him as Virginia Lodge Grand Master and became the leading proponent of centralization and federalism at the First Constitutional Convention in 1787. The federalism at the heart of the US Constitution is identical to the federalism laid out in the Freemason’s Anderson’s Constitutions of 1723. William Randolph became the nation’s first Attorney General and Secretary of State under George Washington. His family returned to England loyal to the Crown. John Marshall, the nation’s first Supreme Court Justice, was also a Mason. [3]
When Benjamin Franklin journeyed to France to seek financial help for American revolutionaries, his meetings took place at Rothschild banks. He brokered arms sales via German Mason Baron von Steuben. His Committees of Correspondence operated through Freemason channels and paralleled a British spy network. In 1776 Franklin became de facto Ambassador to France. In 1779 he became Grand Master of the French Neuf Soeurs (Nine Sisters) Lodge, to which John Paul Jones and Voltaire belonged. Franklin was also a member of the more secretive Royal Lodge of Commanders of the Temple West of Carcasonne, whose members included Frederick Prince of Whales. While Franklin preached temperance in the US, he cavorted wildly with his Lodge brothers in Europe. Franklin served as Postmaster General from the 1750’s to 1775 – a role traditionally relegated to British spies. [4]
With Rothschild financing Alexander Hamilton founded two New York banks, including Bank of New York. [5] He died in a gun battle with Aaron Burr, who founded Bank of Manhattan with Kuhn Loeb financing. Hamilton exemplified the contempt which the Eight Families hold towards common people, once stating, “All communities divide themselves into the few and the many. The first are the rich and the well born, the others the mass of the people…The people are turbulent and changing; they seldom judge and determine right. Give therefore to the first class a distinct, permanent share of government. They will check the unsteadiness of the second.”[6]
Hamilton was only the first in a series of Eight Families cronies to hold the key position of Treasury Secretary. In recent times Kennedy Treasury Secretary Douglas Dillon came from Dillon Read (now part of UBS Warburg). Nixon Treasury Secretaries David Kennedy and William Simon came from Continental Illinois Bank (now part of Bank of America) and Salomon Brothers (now part of Citigroup), respectively. Carter Treasury Secretary Michael Blumenthal came from Goldman Sachs, Reagan Treasury Secretary Donald Regan came from Merrill Lynch (now part of Bank of America), Bush Sr. Treasury Secretary Nicholas Brady came from Dillon Read (UBS Warburg) and both Clinton Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin and Bush Jr. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson came from Goldman Sachs. Obama Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner worked at Kissinger Associates and the New York Fed.
Thomas Jefferson argued that the United States needed a publicly-owned central bank so that European monarchs and aristocrats could not use the printing of money to control the affairs of the new nation. Jefferson extolled, “A country which expects to remain ignorant and free…expects that which has never been and that which will never be. There is scarcely a King in a hundred who would not, if he could, follow the example of Pharaoh – get first all the people’s money, then all their lands and then make them and their children servants forever…banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies. Already they have raised up a money aristocracy.” Jefferson watched as the Euro-banking conspiracy to control the United States unfolded, weighing in, “Single acts of tyranny may be ascribed to the accidental opinion of the day, but a series of oppressions begun at a distinguished period, unalterable through every change of ministers, too plainly prove a deliberate, systematic plan of reducing us to slavery”. [7[
But the Rothschild-sponsored Hamilton’s arguments for a private US central bank carried the day. In 1791 the Bank of the United States (BUS) was founded, with the Rothschilds as main owners. The bank’s charter was to run out in 1811. Public opinion ran in favor of revoking the charter and replacing it with a Jeffersonian public central bank. The debate was postponed as the nation was plunged by the Euro-bankers into the War of 1812. Amidst a climate of fear and economic hardship, Hamilton’s bank got its charter renewed in 1816.
Old Hickory, Honest Abe & Camelot
In 1828 Andrew Jackson took a run at the US Presidency. Throughout his campaign he railed against the international bankers who controlled the BUS. Jackson ranted, “You are a den of vipers. I intend to expose you and by Eternal God I will rout you out. If the people understood the rank injustices of our money and banking system there would be a revolution before morning.”
Jackson won the election and revoked the bank’s charter stating, “The Act seems to be predicated on an erroneous idea that the present shareholders have a prescriptive right to not only the favor, but the bounty of the government...for their benefit does this Act exclude the whole American people from competition in the purchase of this monopoly. Present stockholders and those inheriting their rights as successors be established a privileged order, clothed both with great political power and enjoying immense pecuniary advantages from their connection with government. Should its influence be concentrated under the operation of such an Act as this, in the hands of a self-elected directory whose interests are identified with those of the foreign stockholders, will there not be cause to tremble for the independence of our country in war...controlling our currency, receiving our public monies and holding thousands of our citizens independence, it would be more formidable and dangerous than the naval and military power of the enemy. It is to be regretted that the rich and powerful too often bend the acts of government for selfish purposes...to make the rich richer and more powerful. Many of our rich men have not been content with equal protection and equal benefits, but have besought us to make them richer by acts of Congress. I have done my duty to this country.”[8]
Populism prevailed and Jackson was re-elected. In 1835 he was the target of an assassination attempt. The gunman was Richard Lawrence, who confessed that he was, “in touch with the powers in Europe”. [9]
Still, in 1836 Jackson refused to renew the BUS charter. Under his watch the US national debt went to zero for the first and last time in our nation’s history. This angered the international bankers, whose primary income is derived from interest payments on debt. BUS President Nicholas Biddle cut off funding to the US government in 1842, plunging the US into a depression. Biddle was an agent for the Paris-based Jacob Rothschild. [10]
The Mexican War was simultaneously sprung on Jackson. A few years later the Civil War was unleashed, with London bankers backing the Union and French bankers backing the South. The Lehman family made a fortune smuggling arms to the south and cotton to the north. By 1861 the US was $100 million in debt. New President Abraham Lincoln snubbed the Euro-bankers again, issuing Lincoln Greenbacks to pay Union Army bills.
The Rothschild-controlled Times of London wrote, “If that mischievous policy, which had its origins in the North American Republic, should become indurated down to a fixture, then that Government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off its debts and be without debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous beyond precedent in the history of the civilized governments of the world. The brains and the wealth of all countries will go to North America. That government must be destroyed, or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe.” [11]
The Euro-banker-written Hazard Circular was exposed and circulated throughout the country by angry populists. It stated, “The great debt that capitalists will see is made out of the war and must be used to control the valve of money. To accomplish this government bonds must be used as a banking basis. We are now awaiting Secretary of Treasury Salmon Chase to make that recommendation. It will not allow Greenbacks to circulate as money as we cannot control that. We control bonds and through them banking issues”.
The 1863 National Banking Act reinstated a private US central bank and Chase’s war bonds were issued. Lincoln was re-elected the next year, vowing to repeal the act after he took his January 1865 oaths of office. Before he could act, he was assassinated at the Ford Theatre by John Wilkes Booth. Booth had major connections to the international bankers. His granddaughter wrote This One Mad Act, which details Booth’s contact with “mysterious Europeans” just before the Lincoln assassination.
Following the Lincoln hit, Booth was whisked away by members of a secret society known as Knights of the Golden Circle (KGC). KGC had close ties to the French Society of Seasons, which produced Karl Marx. KGC had fomented much of the tension that caused the Civil War and President Lincoln had specifically targeted the group. Booth was a KGC member and was connected through Confederate Secretary of State Judah Benjamin to the House of Rothschild. Benjamin fled to England after the Civil War. [12]
Nearly a century after Lincoln was assassinated for issuing Greenbacks, President John F. Kennedy found himself in the Eight Families’ crosshairs. Kennedy had announced a crackdown on off-shore tax havens and proposed increases in tax rates on large oil and mining companies. He supported eliminating tax loopholes which benefit the super-rich. His economic policies were publicly attacked by Fortune magazine, the Wall Street Journal and both David and Nelson Rockefeller. Even Kennedy’s own Treasury Secretary Douglas Dillon, who came from the UBS Warburg-controlled Dillon Read investment bank, voiced opposition to the JFK proposals. [13]
Kennedy’s fate was sealed in June 1963 when he authorized the issuance of more than $4 billion in United States Notes by his Treasury Department in an attempt to circumvent the high interest rate usury of the private Federal Reserve international banker crowd. The wife of Lee Harvey Oswald, who was conveniently gunned down by Jack Ruby before Ruby himself was shot, told author A. J. Weberman in 1994, “The answer to the Kennedy assassination is with the Federal Reserve Bank. Don’t underestimate that. It’s wrong to blame it on Angleton and the CIA per se only. This is only one finger on the same hand. The people who supply the money are above the CIA”. [14]
Fueled by incoming President Lyndon Johnson’s immediate escalation of the Vietnam War, the US sank further into debt. Its citizens were terrorized into silence. If they could kill the President they could kill anyone.
The House of Rothschild
The Dutch House of Orange founded the Bank of Amsterdam in 1609 as the world’s first central bank. Prince William of Orange married into the English House of Windsor, taking King James II’s daughter Mary as his bride. The Orange Order Brotherhood, which recently fomented Northern Ireland Protestant violence, put William III on the English throne where he ruled both Holland and Britain. In 1694 William III teamed up with the UK aristocracy to launch the private Bank of England.
The Old Lady of Threadneedle Street- as the Bank of England is known- is surrounded by thirty foot walls. Three floors beneath it the third largest stock of gold bullion in the world is stored. [15]
The Rothschilds and their inbred Eight Families partners gradually came to control the Bank of England. The daily London gold “fixing” occurred at the N. M. Rothschild Bank until 2004. As Bank of England Deputy Governor George Blunden put it, “Fear is what makes the bank’s powers so acceptable. The bank is able to exert its influence when people are dependent on us and fear losing their privileges or when they are frightened.”[16]
Mayer Amschel Rothschild sold the British government German Hessian mercenaries to fight against American Revolutionaries, diverting the proceeds to his brother Nathan in London, where N.M. (Nathan and Mayer) Rothschild & Sons was established. Mayer was a serious student of Cabala and launched his fortune on money embezzled from William IX- royal administrator of the Hesse-Kassel region and a prominent Freemason.
Rothschild-controlled Barings bankrolled the Chinese opium and African slave trades. It financed the Louisiana Purchase. When several states defaulted on its loans, Barings bribed Daniel Webster to make speeches stressing the virtues of loan repayment. The states held their ground, so the House of Rothschild cut off the money spigot in 1842, plunging the US into a deep depression. It was often said that the wealth of the Rothschilds depended on the bankruptcy of nations. Mayer Amschel Rothschild once said, “I care not who controls a nation’s political affairs, so long as I control her currency”.
War didn’t hurt the family fortune either. The House of Rothschild financed the Prussian War, the Crimean War and the British attempt to seize the Suez Canal from the French. Nathan Rothschild made a huge financial bet on Napoleon at the Battle of Waterloo, while also funding the Duke of Wellington’s peninsular campaign against Napoleon. Both the Mexican War and the Civil War were goldmines for the family.
nathanrotschild.jpg

Nathan Rothschild

One Rothschild family biography mentions a London meeting where an “International Banking Syndicate” decided to pit the American North against the South as part of a “divide and conquer” strategy. German Chancellor Otto von Bismarck once stated, “The division of the United States into federations of equal force was decided long before the Civil War. These bankers were afraid that the United States…would upset their financial domination over the world. The voice of the Rothschilds prevailed.” Rothschild biographer Derek Wilson says the family was the official European banker to the US government and strong supporters of the Bank of the United States. [17]
Family biographer Niall Ferguson notes a “substantial and unexplained gap” in private Rothschild correspondence between 1854-1860. He says all copies of outgoing letters written by the London Rothschilds during this Civil War period “were destroyed at the orders of successive partners”. [18]
French and British troops had, at the height of the Civil War, encircled the US. The British sent 11,000 troops to Crown-controlled Canada, which gave safe harbor to Confederate agents. France’s Napoleon III installed Austrian Hapsburg family member Archduke Maximilian as his puppet emperor in Mexico, where French troops massed on the Texas border. Only an 11th-hour deployment of two Russian warship fleets by US ally Czar Alexander II in 1863 saved the United States from re-colonization. [19]
That same year the Chicago Tribune blasted, “Belmont (August Belmont was a US Rothschild agent and had a Triple Crown horse race named in his honor) and the Rothschilds…who have been buying up Confederate war bonds.”
Salmon Rothschild said of a deceased President Lincoln, “He rejects all forms of compromise. He has the appearance of a peasant and can only tell barroom stories.” Baron Jacob Rothschild was equally flattering towards the US citizenry. He once commented to US Minister to Belgium Henry Sanford on the over half a million Americans who died during the Civil War, “When your patient is desperately sick, you try desperate measures, even to bloodletting.” Salmon and Jacob were merely carrying forth a family tradition. A few generations earlier Mayer Amschel Rothschild bragged of his investment strategy, “When the streets of Paris are running in blood, I buy”. [20]
Mayer Rothschild’s sons were known as the Frankfurt Five. The eldest – Amschel – ran the family’s Frankfurt bank with his father, while Nathan ran London operations. Youngest son Jacob set up shop in Paris, while Salomon ran the Vienna branch and Karl was off to Naples. Author Frederick Morton estimates that by 1850 the Rothschilds were worth over $10 billion. [21] Some researchers believe that their fortune today exceeds $100 trillion.
The Warburgs, Kuhn Loebs, Goldman Sachs, Schiffs and Rothschilds have intermarried into one big happy banking family. The Warburg family- which controls Deutsche Bank and BNP- tied up with the Rothschilds in 1814 in Hamburg, while Kuhn Loeb powerhouse Jacob Schiff shared quarters with Rothschilds in 1785. Schiff immigrated to America in 1865. He joined forces with Abraham Kuhn and married Solomon Loeb’s daughter. Loeb and Kuhn married each others sisters and the Kuhn Loeb dynasty was consummated. Felix Warburg married Jacob Schiff’s daughter. Two Goldman daughters married two sons of the Sachs family, creating Goldman Sachs. In 1806 Nathan Rothschild married the oldest daughter of Levi Barent Cohen, a leading financier in London. [22] Thus, Merrill Lynch super-bull Abby Joseph Cohen and Clinton Secretary of Defense William Cohen are likely descended from Rothschilds.
Today the Rothschild’s control a far-flung financial empire, which includes majority stakes in most world central banks. The Edmond de Rothschild clan owns the Banque Privee SA in Lugano, Switzerland and the Rothschild Bank AG of Zurich. The family of Jacob Lord Rothschild owns the powerful Rothschild Italia in Milan. They are founding members of the exclusive $10 trillion Club of the Isles – which controls corporate giants Royal Dutch Shell, Imperial Chemical Industries, Lloyds of London, Unilever, Barclays, Lonrho, Rio Tinto Zinc, BHP Billiton and Anglo American DeBeers. It dominates the world supply of petroleum, gold, diamonds, and many other vital raw materials. [23]
The Club of the Isles provides capital for George Soros’ Quantum Fund NV – which made substantial financial gains in 1998-99 following the collapse of currencies of Thailand, Indonesia and Russia. Soros was a major shareholder at George W. Bush’s Harken Energy. The Club of Isles is led by the Rothschilds and includes Queen Elizabeth II and other wealthy European aristocrats and Nobility.[24]
Perhaps the largest repository for Rothschild wealth today is Rothschilds Continuation Holdings AG – a secretive Swiss-based bank holding company. By the late 1990s scions of the Rothschild global empire were Barons Guy and Elie de Rothschild in France and Lord Jacob and Sir Evelyn Rothschild in Britain. [25]
Evelyn was chairman of the Economist and a director at DeBeers and IBM UK.
Jacob backed Arnold Schwarzenegger’s California gubernatorial campaign. He took control of Khodorkovsky’s YUKOS oil shares just before the Russian government arrested him. In 2010 Jacob joined Rupert Murdoch in a shale oil extraction partnership in Israel through Genie Energy – a subsidiary of IDT Corporation. [26]
Within months, Sarah Palin had hired former IDT executive Michael Glassner as her chief of staff. [27] Is Palin the Rothschild choice in 2012?
 
And they use things like inciting news articles that porn is bad for our health, encourages violence against women in youth, etc., and then couple that with violent public events that suggest they are a product of things like porn. The public is then convinced (because we're like lemmings), and doesn't fight against it- and ignores the larger picture of how their rights are being violated....It sounds so simple, and yet it happens all the time and we're too blind to it. Even now I'm like "that's just silly to think that"- but it's because I've been so programmed to think that the government is working in our best interest- when it's not.

This method was given a name by the philosopher Hegel. He called it: 'thesis, antithesis & synthesis'. David Ike calls it: 'problem, reaction, solution'

So basically the cabal have an idea of something they want to achieve. So lets say that they want to take the publics guns away. They will create a PROBLEM for example they might stage a shooting in a school. This then creates a REACTION in the public which is shock, outrage and grief. This then enables the el-ite to present the SOLUTION which they had planned all along. Which in this case would be to get their minions to blame guns in the corporate media they own to make everyone think that gun ownership is the problem. The public are so grief stricken that they agree to the new laws and hand over their guns and the means to defend themselves with it

They did this in a school shooting in the UK which ended private ownership of handguns

Hegels theory was taught by him to the sons of the central banking families in the university of Berlin eg the rothschilds, warburgs, schiffs all come from germany

Hegels dialectic is a way of playing both ends against the middle. So for example if you want to control the political arena then you have two political parties which you fund and you pretend that these parties come from different ends of the spectrum when really both parties are central to the political spectrum then you make a whole load of theatre in your mainstream media to make it seem credible that these parties are actually competing. This gives the public the illusion that they have a choice and that they live in a democracy
 
Last edited:
Ernie Tertelgte..wow...He is right though. It is natural law that human feed themselves!

Technically land belongs to no one, and everyone at the same time. How can law prevent someone from going against the primary means of human existence - sustenance!
 
The government use the serial numbers on our birth certificates to trade us on the stock exchange.....we each have a price tag on our heads

[video=youtube;o3RYTsz0EmU]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3RYTsz0EmU[/video]
 
Ernie Tertelgte..wow...He is right though. It is natural law that human feed themselves!

Technically land belongs to no one, and everyone at the same time. How can law prevent someone from going against the primary means of human existence - sustenance!

All of it exists because we believe in it

We give their system our attention and our energy. We invest our psychic energy into their system, their laws, their money and so on

Their political system continues because people continue to buy into it.....this gives them a claim to democratic legitimacy

Their laws stand because we go along with it

This is why the answer,as ghandi knew, is mass civil disobediance.

One person disobeying won't do much but a million people disobeying can damage an economy. For people to be acting in concert though they need to be aware enough of these issues and of what is required

The corporations are simply a vehicle for the cabal through which to manifest their power. They will keep taking and taking and taking until people put their foot down and say 'enough!' This is what happened in Bolivia. the corporation Bechtel bribed the bolivian government to get them to sell the water rights to them. Once they were privatised and sold to bechtel, bechtel then raised the prices of water to squeeze profits from the people. Soon many people couldn't afford water so they began collecting rainwater.

bechtel then bribed the corrupt bolivian politicians again, this time to get them to pass laws making it illegal to gather rainwater!! This was a step too far for the bolivian people who rose up in large numbers and demanded a repeal of the laws. This was granted and bechtel had to back down

Just shows though...if the people let them the corporations will charge us for the water we drink, the air we breath and the ground we stand on
 
Last edited:
And then news outlets make the people believe sovereign citizens are violent and domestic threats. http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/01/17/when-sovereign-citizens-snap.html


The government use the serial numbers on our birth certificates to trade us on the stock exchange.....we each have a price tag on our heads

[video=youtube;o3RYTsz0EmU]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3RYTsz0EmU[/video]


This is really scary to realize. Really scary. The situation reminds me of Cyphor from the Matrix- how he just wants to go back and not remember a thing. It's overwhelming to think about how we're being controlled. They say that there are roughly 300000 sovereign citizens in American, and I know there's a movement in Canada. That is a lot of people, but if you compare it to the opposing side, it's such an insignificant number.

There's so much written about the apocalypse, but it seems like a more realistic event is the uprising of society to overturn the control- creating chaos in the existing social and cultural structures. But at the same time, getting enough people to not be afraid to take a stand against such a large entity is unlikely....zombies are more likely I think.
 
Governance: the most profitable and least effective industry on the planet.

OP: yes! -indirectly. Controlling information is nearly as important as controlling oil in today's world. We have a handful of people running the world into the ground and we collectively let them because of all the propaganda campaigns out there.

I mean, we have reefs that are dying, melting ice, melted permafrost, hottest months on record... Is global warming a problem? And now we start to argue over the nuances of global warming... Why? Because that's exactly what they want us to do. Their propaganda campaigns are working perfectly. If the populace ever decides global warming is really a problem it would move from a political issue that will never get anywhere (thanks to our ruling class liking the way things are) to an engineering problem that we can fix. But no, we argue. We are, in fact, just as lame as they take us for.
 
This is a beyond scary statement. The reality is, we are very careless with our money- we don't think twice about giving it to the banks. I'm not sure I even want to think about the consequences of that...



I'm just curious, do any of you have any thoughts, comments or information about the upcoming Olympics? Especially around the host, Russia?

Putin is probably the smartest person of power out there on the world stage... he lives and breathes strategem and intelligence plays. I would be surprised if something big happened during the Olympics, I think he might actually be a patriot. He already got at least some of the popular support he wanted going after the terrorists around there, and wouldn't want to appear 'weak'. I think terrorist plots would be the easier sort to remote-view... and they love their psi-war crap there.
 
[video=youtube;BCJSKhtTtC0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BCJSKhtTtC0[/video]
 
And then news outlets make the people believe sovereign citizens are violent and domestic threats. http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/01/17/when-sovereign-citizens-snap.html

The reality is that more and more people are waking upto the fact that the cabal is waging a quiet war against the populace. This war takes many forms from changes in laws which take peoples rights away to lowering the populations immune systems and fertility as a population control method

once a person realises that the cabal is activiely poisoning us then it becomes clear that this is a life or death struggle. So if we are under attack then do people not have the right to defend themselves?

For example no one today would criticise anyone for armed resistance against the nazis, so why shouldn't anyone today be able to defend themselves from the zio-nazis?

This is really scary to realize. Really scary. The situation reminds me of Cyphor from the Matrix- how he just wants to go back and not remember a thing. It's overwhelming to think about how we're being controlled. They say that there are roughly 300000 sovereign citizens in American, and I know there's a movement in Canada. That is a lot of people, but if you compare it to the opposing side, it's such an insignificant number.

Yeah but on the bright side that number of awakened and empowered people who are taking their own destinty into their own hands and taking responsibility for themselves and their communities is only going to grow

There's so much written about the apocalypse, but it seems like a more realistic event is the uprising of society to overturn the control- creating chaos in the existing social and cultural structures. But at the same time, getting enough people to not be afraid to take a stand against such a large entity is unlikely....zombies are more likely I think.

The cabal have always orcehstrated crises in order to then bring about the change they want to see. For example they brought about the great depression by creating a run on the banks in order to justify the creation of the central bank which they had argued would create greater stability; in reality it has seen world wars and endless boom and bust cycles since the central bank was created

Food is the big factor. When food becomes 40% of income people rise up so it might seem like people are docile at the moment but that can all change very quickly

They are going to grab money from peoples bank accounts soon. I have warned people here to move their money out of the banks. They did this in Cyprus and that was a dry run for europe and north america.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-confiscation-of-bank-savings-to-save-the-banks/5329411
 
Last edited:
Back
Top