extraverted Sensing (Se) ********************* (21.4)
introverted Sensing (Si) ************************** (26.2)
extraverted Intuiting (Ne) ****************************************** (42.6)
introverted Intuiting (Ni) ************************************* (37.2)
extraverted Thinking (Te) ******************** (20.1)
introverted Thinking (Ti) ************************************* (37.3)
extraverted Feeling (Fe) ********************** (22.3)
introverted Feeling (Fi) ********************************* (33.7)
Summary Analysis of Profile
By focusing on the strongest configuration of cognitive processes, your pattern of responses most closely matches individuals of this type:
INTPLead (Dominant) Process
Introverted Thinking (Ti): Gaining leverage (influence) using a framework. Detaching to study a situation from different angles and fit it to a theory, framework or principle. Checking for accuracy. Using leverage to solve the problem.
Support (Auxilliary) Process
Extraverted Intuiting (Ne): Exploring the emerging patterns. Wondering about patterns of interaction across various situations. Checking what hypotheses and meanings fit best. Trusting what emerges as you shift a situation’s dynamics.
If these cognitive processes don't fit well then consider these types:
ENTP, or
INFP
Uh oh.
This actually makes a lot of sense Satya. You do love to debate, the NTP's favorite game. To INTPs and ENTPs, it is simply an act of assessing all the options. To most other types, it can come across as argumentative and in some cases contentious. Also, you seem to like to champion the causes of the downtrodden, an NFP trait. In all of these cases, your Ne is undeniable. When the Ni types here say "It's like this", you're usually quick to respond with "but what about this? or this? or that?" The Ni types come up with a very solid single answer. You are great at developing many plausible answers, which is much more of an Ne trait.
I'm not sure how the quiz results decided that your Ne (42.6) was secondary to your Ti (37.3). It looks very clearly like your pattern is Ne, Ti, Fi, Si, which is not possible according to the typing process. Since your Fi function is stronger than your Si function, the test tool is likely counting your Fe as your inferior function for a set of
Ne, Ti, Fe, and
Si. But, because Fe is so low comparatively, it is reordering them into Ti, Ne, Si, and Fe because Ti and Fe are partners, as are Ne and Si.
In any order your dominant pair in each functions (N, S, F, and T) are likely those mentioned above according to the quiz results. This gives the following possibilities ENTP, INTP, ISFJ, and ESFJ.
If we assume that your primary functions are Te and Fi instead of those mentioned, (which is not a stretch given the similarity in your Fi/Ti vs Fe/Te) this gives the function pairs of Ne, Fi, Te, and Si precedence. In which case you would be an INFP, ENFP, ISTJ, or ESTJ.
Honestly, I believe you to be an
INFP with a very strong Ti function, and a very well developed Ne function but you use as a secondary to your Fi reasoning. Your thought processes seem to start with how you feel about a subject (Fi), move to the possibilities surrounding that subject (Ne), which are backed up by your imperical perceptions (Si), and further validated by rationalizations (Te). Remember that the MBTI is based on the work of Jung's order of cognitive thought, which is not an indicator of how well you think, just the order in which you think. More often than not, someone is going to have cognitive functions developed in a very synonymous proportion to that function's order in their cognitive heirarchy. This isn't by any means a rule, just the most common state. In your case, you've developed the back end of your thinking processes almost as well as the front. Lastly, I think your Ti result is so high because a lot of what you Fi is rational and appears to be Ti, likely very tied to your well developed Ti. If this is the case, your Fi and Te results would indicate higher scores and your Ti would be a little lower.
Why could you get an INFJ result if this quiz is accurate?
The MBTI measures each basic function
preference individually, rather than attempting to assess each individual cognitive function pair, then assumes them all to fall into place as most people have polarized development in them. You however, have a very good development of all of your functions, and great development in both of your introverted reasoning functions. Even your lesser pairs are solid. This makes you difficult to read with the MBTI because it measures
preferences on an axis that do not include the function pairs, instead assessing
Introvert/
Extrovert, i
Ntuitive/
Sensing,
Feeling/
Thinking, and
Judging/
Percieving. It then assumes that the results indicate that the
Introvert/
Extrovert result is part of your dominant core function (N/S or F/T). From there, the MBTI assumes that the
Judging/
Percieving result is tied to your extraverted core function (N/S or F/T). Therefore, if you indicate a preference toward I, N, F, and J, the assumption is that the dominant core function is introverted and the judging function is extraverted. In this case it would assume Ni and Fe respectively. ENFJ would assume that the dominant core function was extraverted as well as the judging function, making them the same - Fe and Ni respectively. However, when the results are close or there is a strong function in the mix, these assumptions can produce a result of the opposite function pairs. For example, an MBTI result of
INFJ implies the function pairs Ni and Fe. But, the MBTI results only imply a
preference toward
Introversion, i
Ntuition,
Feeling, and the Feeling function (assumed to be an extroverted function).
INFPs are Fi and Ne, which is also a preference toward
Introversion and
Feeling, with i
Ntuition preferred over Sensing, but is in essence the exact opposite result. The MBTI commonly makes this mistake with people who have a strong function that does not fit into the mold, causing a fair degree of confusion. Most of the major MBTI testing centers are aware of this and usually know when to look for these types of inconsistancies. In your case I believe your strong Ti is throwing off the assumed pattern, and is a result of your Fi and Te combining to 'cast a shadow' of a much larger Ti than you actually have.
The MBTI would likely interpret your results on the specific function test above as follows:
Of each core set (N, S, F, and T) of results, you have 3 dominant introverted pairs - Fi, Si, and Ti. The MBTI is likely going to assign you an
I, probably a moderate to strong one.
Your N clearly beats your S. No debates here. The MBTI would assign you an
N in the moderate to strong categories.
Of your judging pairs (F and T), they look like they could be very close depending on the test, and your mood when you take it. The MBTI could lean you toward
F, likely in the slight range, depending on question wording.
In this test result, you have a weight of 71 in your four Judging functions (Fi, Fe, Ti, and Te), as opposed to 66.8 in your Perceiving functions (Ni, Ne, Si, and Se), showing a preference toward your judging function. The MBTI will likely interpret that as a lean toward
J, in the slight to moderate range. Also, if you are an INFP your dominant function would be Fi, or as an INTP it would be Ti (despite the extremely high Ne result on this test) which is a judging function. Therefore, the MBTI is squeezed into assuming that your dominant function is Fe because the J/P function is assumed to be an extraverted function, which then cannot be tied to the dominant introverted function.
If those were the case in your MBTI results, then we've tracked down another instance of the MBTI being an inaccurate measure of the cognitive functions in a less than typical individual.
Clearly, you qualify as a less than typical individual, heh.
I had nearly the same thing happen to me.
The MBTI typed me as a borderline ENFP for years. When I recently started getting borderline INFJ results, I decided to delve deeper into the materials on the subject. According to the theory, it would be nigh impossible to suddenly switch all of my main function pairs, yet the MBTI was doing that very thing. Because this made no sense to me, I learned a great deal about all of the function pairs and what the MBTI is trying to guess at when attempting to assess them. The MBTI is a mostly accurate tool. Most of the people who take it are typed accurately because most people have polarized cognitive functions. According to Jung, typical people develop one of each N, S, F, and T, (while N/S and F/T are each balanced with an introverted and extroverted partner), but then generally neglect the opposites of each of these functions. However, rare individuals (like ourselves) develop more of their lesser cognitive functions. The MBTI is not well equipped to type people like us because of the way it is designed.
After researching the definitions of each particular function pair in depth, it became apparent to me that Ne, Te, and Si were not my strong suits, but I did have a strong Fi. I was pretty sure my Fe was the stronger than my Fi, but had no tool to measure specific cognitive processes at the time. Realizing through internal deduction that my dominant pairs were Ni, Fe, Ti, and Se, I decided that am actually an INFJ (because I tend to use my functions in that order, as opposed to Fe, Ni, Se, then Ti which would make me an ENFJ ) and realized that the MBTI had mistyped me as ENFP for the same reasons I mentioned for your being mistyped. In your case, you have a strong Ti throwing off the pattern, just as I have a solid Fi throwing off mine. It is highly likely that my Fe and Ti are combining to form the impression of a much larger Fi than I actually have - taking the introverted reasoning of my Ti and applying it to the feeling reasoning of my secondary Fe.
To the MBTI my preferences looked like iNtuitive Feeling with the stronger function being extraverted, and a preference toward the iNtuitive function. The MBTI interpreted this as Ne with Fi. However, it is actually Ni with Fe. The MBTI got my iNtuition preference right, my Feeling preference right, and was even correct that my iNtuitive function was my dominant. However, because my judging function is extraverted Feeling, it assumed that my dominant function is extraverted and split the wrong way, just like it seems to have split the wrong way with you, due to the nature of how it compiles its results.
Many months after I made this deduction (with the help of some very smart people I know personally and a few online at various MBTI sites, along with a lot of research), I found quizzes like this one that indicate the rather drastic lean I have toward Ni, Fe, Ti, and Se, along with a well developed Fi. My theories have been verified, not only with respect to myself, but how and why the MBTI can mistype people. Your findings seem to verify my hypothesis that this particular test has a tendency to point out a 'ghost' version of the two preferred Judging functions that is rather strong in certain people, which is something the MBTI could be picking up on as well, and is likely the most specific reason for the mistype split.