Brruceling said:There are few better feelings than when you are able to bring someone you love to a state of physical ecstasy.
Brruceling said:Chiming in to say that I think there may be a general consensus among INFJs that sex is only really enjoyable and satisfying in a close, loving relationship. My latest ex-girlfriend and I had a "perfect" sex life in every way, we had incredible sexual chemistry and were always going at it, and yet I always felt detached and frustrated by my own dissatisfaction. The problem was that I simply didn't feel very close to her, I didn't really love her. My current girlfriend and I have a very difficult sexual relationship; it is difficult for us to both get into it at the same time, so we often go long periods of time without having sex at all. However, when we do get into it, it is incredibly passionate because we are so emotionally close and love each other so deeply, and is by far the best sex I have ever had.
Probably the reason it makes so much difference is that there are two components to sexual satisfaction: your own pleasure, and your partner's pleasure. If you only focus on your own pleasure, you're just using another persons body for glorified masturbation. Meaningless sex leaves me feeling about as satisfied as jerking off, except then also I feel bad for using someone I don't really care about for sex which wasn't even that great!
There are few better feelings than when you are able to bring someone you love to a state of physical ecstasy. When you and your lover do absolutely everything you can to please each other sexually, you find you just can't stop smiling afterward. It's probably the greatest experience ever, and can bring two extremely close people even closer together. Beautiful.
There's using a womans vagoo as an extra hand for "the stranger" which tends to be more comfortable...
SP's maybe, then it's both guys and girls. I cannot feel good about sex unless I like them a hell of a lot, has to me mental for me.Hotherym said:Guys seem to be a lot 'luckier' than women when it comes to physical sex. Don't get me wrong, it can be very good, but for me it absolutely has to be backed by their personality and an intense bond, or I just sort of die inside while it's happening and end up frigid. Give me the backing, though, and I can get very wild with it, so it's not as though I'm a prude -- I've done some wild things.
:mrgreen:Hotherym said:And I can't stop giggling at 'the stranger' or 'vagoo,' the latter which sounds like a cartoon character I would love to see.
Hotherym said:And I can't stop giggling at 'the stranger' or 'vagoo,' the latter which sounds like a cartoon character I would love to see.
I imagine more guys are capable of regularly enjoying casual sex than women. This is only because it is quicker and easier for a guy to get off, and there seems to be a prevalent social assumption among men that it is acceptable to define the sexual experience by male ejaculation. In a casual sexual situation, the experience is mainly about your own enjoyment; if you don't have strong feelings for the person you're with, how hard are you going to try to please them?Hotherym said:Guys seem to be a lot 'luckier' than women when it comes to physical sex. Don't get me wrong, it can be very good, but for me it absolutely has to be backed by their personality and an intense bond, or I just sort of die inside while it's happening and end up frigid.
I'm a guy, and I am in the same boat as you. Having sex with a woman is all about the connection/bond I feel with her, and is only really enjoyable when it as an expression of that bond. The more I love her, the better the sex is. I have no interest in casual sex, at all.
And don't get me started about who's luckier! Men may be easier to please, but women have a much greater capacity for pleasure. If you've had a truly committed lover, you should know this. In a committed, loving, sexual relationship you are very lucky to be a woman.
I always thought half of sex was the passion of the bond, the other half was attempting to get her off as many times as possible before she passes out in ecstasy.
Yeah, that's much worse. If a girl is not completely mine, then I am not interested in sexual gratification with her.Hotherym said:I am not dating someone. I'm...irrevocably, indelibly, psychologically attached, that's all.
For that moment, yes.Hotherym said:Hey, I was just specifying. I dated through dreams.
Question is, if the girl has to be 'yours,' are you willing to be completely 'hers,' too?