- MBTI
- Meh
- Enneagram
- Meh
I'm not trying to defend the definition or the use of the word. You can disagree, and you can say you're for equality but are not a feminist. I don't agree, but that's not the point I was trying to make.The flaw in your logic is the assumption that men already have all rights that women do.
And why use a word that pertains to women if the intended focus was on gender equality?
By using the word term 'equal,' which your definition did, not me, feminism is for men having the same rights as women. I never assumed that they did. I simply pointed out that if you're using the first definition you supplied, and support equality, then you are a feminist. Women can't be equal to men if they have different/more rights. Equal=equal, aka the same. You can't have 'equal rights, but more rights'. That's simply not equal.
I think that the term equal, and all its variants, is far from ambiguous. The implementation and actual realization of such, I would argue, is what is ambiguous.It's simply because the concept of 'equality' is ambiguous.