Fireball in Sky

SealHammer said:
It's not occult if it's true eheuueehahaehheHEUEHAHAHHAEUHAHA
Click to expand...

So if something did strike the meteor what was it? A russian missile?
 
muir said:
So if something did strike the meteor what was it? A russian missile?
Click to expand...

It wasn't struck by anything, you dumb motherfucker. The asteroid was traveling at tens of thousands of miles per hour, many times faster than a space shuttle on reentry. Do you know of any weapons that can travel as fast as a space shuttle?
 
SealHammer said:
It wasn't struck by anything, you dumb motherfucker. The asteroid was traveling at tens of thousands of miles per hour, many times faster than a space shuttle on reentry. Do you know of any missiles that can travel as fast as a space shuttle?
Click to expand...

lol

ok so what was it...if something did in fact strike the meteor as various videos online seem to suggest?
 
muir said:
lol

ok so what was it...if something did in fact strike the meteor as various videos online seem to suggest?
Click to expand...

Good thing these eagle-eyed rational professionals in the UFO community spotted the weapon that the global community of astronomers seemed to miss!

It's an artifact in the way the video picks up light. There's nothing to suggest it was struck by some time-delayed uber-tracking megalaser except your flights of fancy.
 
SealHammer said:
Good thing these eagle-eyed rational professionals in the UFO community spotted the weapon that the global community of astronomers seemed to miss!

It's an artifact in the way the video picks up light. There's nothing to suggest it was struck by some time-delayed uber-tracking megalaser except your flights of fancy.
Click to expand...

My position is that i don't know what might lie out there in the far reaches of the universe because i haven't been there (since i was star dust)

Also our finest scientists can't even agree on the nature of reality

for these reasons i think that einstein had a point when he said that in a world so full of possibility dogma is indecent ( i can't seem to find the quote online...i'm pretty sure he said that or something similar though!)

So for me all possibilities are on the table

I wasn't asserting anything but was saying that in some clips online something seems to strike the meteor and if that is the case what do you think it is?

I didn't say anything about a laser...i didn't specify anything at all....your imagination seems to keep filling in gaps
 
muir said:
My position is that i don't know what might lie out there in the far reaches of the universe because i haven't been there (since i was star dust)
Click to expand...

Agreed.

Also our finest scientists can't even agree on the nature of reality
Click to expand...
I don't dispute this.

for these reasons i think that einstein had a point when he said that in a world so full of possibility dogma is indecent ( i can't seem to find the quote online...i'm pretty sure he said that or something similar though!)
Click to expand...
Quite.

So for me all possibilities are on the table

I wasn't asserting anything but was saying that in some clips online something seems to strike the meteor and if that is the case what do you think it is?
Click to expand...

Sure, except taking what any dude says at face value is an easy way to be deceived by the ignorance or malice of others. Furthermore, as much as I like to entertain the existence of extraterrestrial intelligence, I don't consider the majority of UFO theories to be valid. There's simply not enough evidence to support those kinds of beliefs.

As far as the video goes, if it were hypothetically struck by something, the only thing that could reach it at the velocity it was traveling would have to be an EM weapon. Now, the focused-light weapons that have been in development recently (see: Boeing ABL) are pretty weak but in their limited testing as missile interceptors seem effective, if not absurdly expensive and unwieldy to maintain and power. On paper, a more powerful version of this could be used to track and destroy an asteroid at short range (VERY short range) as it plummets toward the earth. In practical terms, however, you would need a fuel source more energy-dense, more plentiful, and faster-burning than has thus far (to my knowledge) been discovered or theorized. I can't even begin to imagine how advanced the tracking system would have to be.

As it stands, the evidence doesn't seem to support such a possibility.

I didn't say anything about a laser...i didn't specify anything at all....your imagination seems to keep filling in gaps
Click to expand...

Sorry, I didn't mean to put words in your mouth. At times when I consider the possibilities I internally discount the ones that definitively will not work (within what I know) and verbalize the one that is most plausible, regardless of its improbability or its prior mentions in the discussion. I can see how that might look like me jumping the gun.
 
SealHammer said:
I like how a video of a meteor has created a discussion about alien conspiracy theories.

Never change, INFJs. Never change.
Click to expand...

9189283.jpg
 
[MENTION=6650]SealHammer[/MENTION]

why so mean? It's a pretty glowing ball of light...just enjoy the beauty of it........ :)
 
SealHammer said:
Agreed.


I don't dispute this.


Quite.



Sure, except taking what any dude says at face value is an easy way to be deceived by the ignorance or malice of others. Furthermore, as much as I like to entertain the existence of extraterrestrial intelligence, I don't consider the majority of UFO theories to be valid. There's simply not enough evidence to support those kinds of beliefs.

As far as the video goes, if it were hypothetically struck by something, the only thing that could reach it at the velocity it was traveling would have to be an EM weapon. Now, the focused-light weapons that have been in development recently (see: Boeing ABL) are pretty weak but in their limited testing as missile interceptors seem effective, if not absurdly expensive and unwieldy to maintain and power. On paper, a more powerful version of this could be used to track and destroy an asteroid at short range (VERY short range) as it plummets toward the earth. In practical terms, however, you would need a fuel source more energy-dense, more plentiful, and faster-burning than has thus far (to my knowledge) been discovered or theorized. I can't even begin to imagine how advanced the tracking system would have to be.

As it stands, the evidence doesn't seem to support such a possibility.



Sorry, I didn't mean to put words in your mouth. At times when I consider the possibilities I internally discount the ones that definitively will not work (within what I know) and verbalize the one that is most plausible, regardless of its improbability or its prior mentions in the discussion. I can see how that might look like me jumping the gun.
Click to expand...

There seems to be a move towards the development of a variety of directed energy weapons

I honestly don't know if the object was struck or not; i thought it would be interesting to bring up though

I do know however that the russians have been giving a lot of thought to intercepting high speed objects due to the cold war

They developed a high speed jet called the foxbat and when the US got hold of a foxbat or the plans of one they laughed at the primitive controls in the aircraft until one engineer pointed out that the controls would due to their simple construction remain functional even after the electromagnetic shock from a nuclear blast; the jet had been developed to fly up high in the atmosphere at speeds of 1200mph and to shoot down ICBM's and that was years ago so who knows what technology they have now

Obviously the US has spoken a lot about the son of star wars and about various lasers fired from space, then there is HAARP

I think the reality is that the government is usually far ahead of the publics actual perception of where cutting edge technology is at
 
That stuff interests me because I believe there's no mistake about it that different national states ARE seeking to exploit weaponised ecological and environmental technology and I totally believe that it accounts for a lot of what has been going on.

Although I'm also inclined to believe that a lot of the stories about politicians developing sudden and unprecidented heart difficulties, this happened to Tony Blair, or celebrities committing suicide, being inexplicably shot dead by random strangers, even kamikazi spree kills or suicidal terrorism are all likely to be spy games and weaponised psychological trickery too.

Darrien Brown did a lot of TV shows about this, which I thought was interesting, from programming assasinations to convincing people they were responsible for crimes they never committed through implanted false memories, he's an entertainer so what are the spooks capable of? Although I didnt like Brown's shows because he's one of the angry athiests who I dont like who have apparently set out to undermine faith in anything and not simply faith in God, particularly with a TV about how an audience could be induced to torture someone they believed as an unwitting contestant in a reality TV like something out of the Stanford Prison Experiments, he made a lot of good points indirectly.
 
Was this mysterious fireball replaced by an equally mysterious cheeseball when the sky went from blue to black?
 
My Dad was fishing with a friend about 60 miles upriver on the Savannah River over 50 years ago, when they saw this rolling ball of fire traveling down river above the water a few feet. They motored to the bank on one side of the river and watched with amazement. I told them that must have been where Snuffy Smith got the term, "Great balls o' fire!" FTOYWDNK, there is a nuclear plant further up river from there.
 
just me said:
My Dad was fishing with a friend about 60 miles upriver on the Savannah River over 50 years ago, when they saw this rolling ball of fire traveling down river above the water a few feet. They motored to the bank on one side of the river and watched with amazement. I told them that must have been where Snuffy Smith got the term, "Great balls o' fire!" FTOYWDNK, there is a nuclear plant further up river from there.
Click to expand...

All I can say is, great balls of fire!
 
Didn't see it. He said they had to run the boat into the willows overhanging the edges of the river to get out of the way. I asked a lot of questions, too. Best description was a large, rolling ball of fire a few feet above the water going down river.
 
just me said:
Didn't see it. He said they had to run the boat into the willows overhanging the edges of the river to get out of the way. I asked a lot of questions, too. Best description was a large, rolling ball of fire a few feet above the water going down river.
Click to expand...
Amazing. Had I seen something like that, I would go back with video equipment etc on occasion to see if I could capture it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top