Ne and Ni have the same capabilities, but Ni focuses deeper on a smaller range, while Ne notices the whole spectrum. Learned that recently.
Edit: While ENTPs use Ti (for example) to jump around in the spectrum, Ni users jump around on their own using their individually wired association chains.
I..eh.. what?This instantly evokes many Skype conversations with @Lady Jolanda![]()
. I must say that it makes for very pleasant intellectual discussions.
You sound like a fun person to hang out with, and I mean this without the least irony![]()
That just sounds awesome. You don't happen to have transcript of this conversation Jkxx?Totally agree, that might as well say weird association chains too - yesterday had a (few hour long) conversation with a friend which went from metaphysics to quantum mechanics to astrology to random other stuff that would have made a "normal" person's head explode.
More like..all the time.Spaced* coyote sometimes
Do we? I think we go from point to point rather organically, I almost never notice that we really finish anything. Didn't we discuss the opposite recently?With @Ginny we usually go from point to point, but we finish speaking about the previous point first.
That just sounds awesome. You don't happen to have transcript of this conversation Jkxx?![]()
I have noticed in Skype conversations with @Ren that he has this amazing ability to go off on a small tangent but never losing sight of the main point.
Your discussion with Faux-ENTP-secretly-an-INTP WollyGreen was especially enlightening.
![]()
Wolly is definitely INTP but his profile says just that, Jo![]()
Oh, definitely! We do move between points very organically, and we always have more to discuss, but I do believe our discussions progress in a fairly linear, streamlined fashion, not leaving points hanging halfway.Do we? I think we go from point to point rather organically, I almost never notice that we really finish anything. Didn't we discuss the opposite recently?
I do tend to bring us to a previous point if I think of something new while we talk about something elseOh, definitely! We do move between points very organically, and we always have more to discuss, but I do believe our discussions progress in a fairly linear, streamlined fashion, not leaving points hanging halfway.![]()
Regarding WollyGreen, this thread said something else.
https://www.infjs.com/threads/why-do-entps-test-as-intp.35063/
I do tend to bring us to a previous point if I think of something new while we talk about something else![]()
Ginny also wants her slice of ze Ni
You're dramatic, I'm enthusiastic.Pretty sure you do it too, but I think I have a dramatic way of doing it or something. Like 5 minutes after the tangent, "Anyway, to return to the topic at hand"...
You're dramatic, I'm enthusiastic.
Lurk said:I'm an INTP, weak T
Curious, do you use functions theories? Being INTP weak T makes perfect sense/I think the dichotomies have their own merits
Just curious if you have a thing about N-dom vs T-dom
I don't have as strong a T>F, and I tend to think I'm probably N-dom
Lurk said:I do think I'm an Ne dom INTP.
Well by use functions theories I probably mean, the models (some use the ideas more free-flowingly but won't subscribe to a given model)
I realized you mentioned Ne/Fe, but basically I'm curious if you subscribe to INTP only-in-dichotomies or something (vs the TiNe thing), or both!
Just due to the weakly T comment vs Ti-dom
OK, that makes total sense -- and I think I'm just like you/also a Ne>Ti type!