Skarekrow
~~DEVIL~~
- MBTI
- Ni-INFJ-A
- Enneagram
- Warlock
lol
I'm not worried about their opinion of me! I was trying to show how dumb their position is because in reality we ALL believe in conspiracy theorys and are in fact ALL conspiracy theorists
For example the official narrative of 911 is a theory that there was a conspiracy between some muslim extremists to hijak planes and crash them into targets; so the offical narrative IS a conspiracy theory!! Anyone who believes the government on 911 IS a conspiracy theorist!
Anyway I'm also sharing a perspective relating to the interdependent nature of society and how that impacts on the individual
What i'm saying is that we no longer have the luxury of just letting people have their own opinions anymore when their opinions involve hurting us
I'll give another example relevant to this thread
The authorities are listening by the way...they listen and record EVERYTHING. They call it listening to the 'noise' on the internet
So if enough people are saying online that they understand false flags and that they are wise to the ploy then the US is less likely to try and carry out a false flag on US soil for example letting off a nuke or dirty bomb in one of its one cities to then be able to blame it on Iran in order to then go to war with them as a major geo-political step on the road to the new world order
However if people are instead saying the stuff that just me is saying ie that we should go to war with Iran then it emboldens the conspirators
So its not really healthy for humanity to hold those kind of pro-war opinions anymore cos it could drag us all into a nuclear conflict; Iran for example now has defence pacts with China and Russia so an attack on Iran can pull those two into the conflict
I'm not sure what justme thinks will happen to him in a nuclear conflict with those powers but basically he would be converted to a puff of irradiated dust
I’m not saying that we shouldn’t debate people…but recent studies have shown that people don’t change their minds like that, in fact they double-down on their initial argument no matter how much evidence to the contrary is presented.
So debating people is fine to a point, but after a while I lose interest arguing with a wall for all intents and purposes.
I present stories and ideas about things that I believe are important or helpful, and I will correct people when I know something is an all out falsehood.
Beyond that is really just mental masturbation IMO.