- MBTI
- INFJ
- Enneagram
- 1w2
Read the title and at first I was like, "Oh no..." but this totally makes sense.
I've found that INFJs have a big contradiction of their hands. They may be really good at what they do, but it rarely fits into institutionalized way of doing things.
It's the same issue with Law and the Police- the reasons for joining the Police seem fantastic to me and something that an INFJ could be good at because fundamentally the job is about protecting people and making them safe and keeping harmony and peace (of course, I'm aware that this is actually far from the case in reality, but still, that is what the job should be about). However the INFJ in their infinite counter-culturalism will probably feel absolutely dwarfed by the oppressive nature of "the system" which was built by SJs- for SJs. Like you said, the INFJ has an intuitive grasp on what must be done and how to do it. But procedures, politics, bureaucracy will get in the way of their simple and pure intention.
Now you could say everyone has that problem but to an INFJ, who has an intrinsic understanding of how things can be fixed and how things should be, this would probably cause a massive moral inner tension in them. More so then other types. INFJs aren't that great at playing the system either (as opposed to ESXP's), they need a clear and uncluttered space to do their best, so they are more likely to wait for opportunities then force them through protest and conflict. I mean it's possible for an INFJ to uphold a prolonged controversy and protest but such actions takes huge amounts of energy- their throughput for that kind of action has less efficiency [ > Ti > Se = inferior in efficiency]
To be fair, this is something all would-be psychologists would have to acknowledge, whether your an INFJ or not. Some people are beyond helping, seriously fucked up people may never get better and they'll probably end up on a trail of pharmaceuticals rather than therapy or counselling.
You're making it sound as if INFJs only have the capacity to help people in nice, non-confrontational, congenial environments and that harder or more severe cases are beyond their capabilities because... because why?
INFJ's do their best work when they can use their intuition rather than a strict manual for how things are done.
I've found that INFJs have a big contradiction of their hands. They may be really good at what they do, but it rarely fits into institutionalized way of doing things.
It's the same issue with Law and the Police- the reasons for joining the Police seem fantastic to me and something that an INFJ could be good at because fundamentally the job is about protecting people and making them safe and keeping harmony and peace (of course, I'm aware that this is actually far from the case in reality, but still, that is what the job should be about). However the INFJ in their infinite counter-culturalism will probably feel absolutely dwarfed by the oppressive nature of "the system" which was built by SJs- for SJs. Like you said, the INFJ has an intuitive grasp on what must be done and how to do it. But procedures, politics, bureaucracy will get in the way of their simple and pure intention.
Now you could say everyone has that problem but to an INFJ, who has an intrinsic understanding of how things can be fixed and how things should be, this would probably cause a massive moral inner tension in them. More so then other types. INFJs aren't that great at playing the system either (as opposed to ESXP's), they need a clear and uncluttered space to do their best, so they are more likely to wait for opportunities then force them through protest and conflict. I mean it's possible for an INFJ to uphold a prolonged controversy and protest but such actions takes huge amounts of energy- their throughput for that kind of action has less efficiency [ > Ti > Se = inferior in efficiency]
To this end while INFJ's may be the best of brain-fixers we operate very poorly as psychologists because A, we are often required to work with EVERYONE who comes through the door and B, we're restricted in the level of involvement we're allowed to have. I realize there are safety reasons for those restrictions but there are also people in this world it is possible to help who are simply hopeless within those strictures.
To be fair, this is something all would-be psychologists would have to acknowledge, whether your an INFJ or not. Some people are beyond helping, seriously fucked up people may never get better and they'll probably end up on a trail of pharmaceuticals rather than therapy or counselling.
You're making it sound as if INFJs only have the capacity to help people in nice, non-confrontational, congenial environments and that harder or more severe cases are beyond their capabilities because... because why?