Bitch what the actual fuck are you talking about with borderliners needing narcisistic supply. Get your uneducated ass out of here and spread your up-side-down bullshit somewhere else. Borderliners don't need narcisistic supply. We HAVE BEEN narcisistic supply many years for our narcisistic parent. We are usually highly empathic. That is why many borderliners have the INFJ personality. My best friend and myself are the example of that. And what do you mean stop caretaking of the borderliner? When we are in a relationship (especially the weak kind of borderliner like me) we usually make sure the person we are in a relationship with is beautiful and perfect and want to make them feel as good as possible. We are also the most loyal persons you will meet, especially INFJ borderliners. With the way you paint borderliners as the evil ones, I am suspecting you are actually a narcisist trying to make the victims seem as the evil ones.
Terminology is often an obstacle when speaking about topics in psychology that are familiar to laypersons and popular culture. That's what is likely responsible for the first misunderstanding, at least so I'll clarify here. Afterward I'll post a more exhaustive explanation of BPD from a clinical perspective just to be thorough and tidy about it.
...what the actual fuck are you talking about with borderliners needing narcisistic supply...Borderliners don't need narcisistic supply. We HAVE BEEN narcisistic supply many years for our narcisistic parent.
Firstly, "narcissistic supply" describes a type of admiration, interpersonal support or sustenance drawn by an individual from his or her environment which is essential to their self-esteem. The entirety of Cluster B disorders are marked as inherently identity-driven as well as addressed via interpersonal means. In this way, the word "narcissistic" does not mean relegated to those specifically diagnosed with Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD). The 4 major variants of Cluster B disorders, Histrionic, Anti-Social, Borderline & Narcissistic) all possess the characteristic demand for behavior/responses from others in accordance with the disorder, disregarding of the autonomy of the other person. The differences across those disorders is often a matter of style of expression in the goal of obtaining supply. Self-harm, guilting, revisionism, identity manipulation, passive-aggression, histrionics, aggression, etc. describe very different kinds of events. What unifies them is the purpose it serves for the Cluster B person (get a response, obtain supply) and the central principle underpinning what it does to the person on the receiving end, namely a loss of autonomy both within a situation and, over time, the loss of a sense that autonomy is available whatsoever.
Secondly, yes, those with BPD (and many other disorders including all of Cluster B) frequently have narcissistic/bipolar/borderline/schizophrenic/avoidant/etc. parents. That describes a component in the matrix of causal mechanisms for BPD and many disorders. It also has no bearing on what BPD, NPD or any other disorder means or what they produce. No child deserves to have an abusive, unstable parent. This is a point of sympathy all people should share. Both, the common causes of cluster B disorders (genetic susceptibility & poor care) and the internal feelings/world of the disordered person (fear, lack of sense of self, anger, anxiety, depression) are real and should be respected. The point is not to allow sympathy to define the discussion in totality, because BPD/NPD/HPD/ASPD/etc. are still, in fact, disorders. More importantly, they are disorders with an interpersonal dimension, wherein those who come to find themselves closest (enmeshed) to the disordered person also suffer greatly and frequently do not survive. The underlying causes of someone's pathology does not eradicate the externalized products of that pathology and those on the receiving end deserve assistance and the option to not participate if required or desired.
We are usually highly empathic...When we are in a relationship (especially the weak kind of borderliner like me) we usually make sure the person we are in a relationship with is beautiful and perfect and want to make them feel as good as possible.
Cluster B personality disorders are identity disorders. They are not synonymous with psychopathy or sociopathy, so yes, empathy was never on the table, nor was it mentioned in my comment. And while we're on the topic of things that aren't synonymous, the intentions, inner motives and feelings of someone is also not synonymous with what they do or the behavior they give to others. Clinicians don't use the term "caretaker" to identify those who love and have relationships with BPD/NPD/etc. persons for no reason. If the BPD/NPD/etc. diagnosis was simply about people who feel bad, but happen to treat people really well, it wouldn't be the socially devastating issue that it is. Those with Cluster B disorders, especially BPD, can and do absolutely feel empathy, provide gestures and show warmth to those they love. Additionally, they manipulate, guilt, gaslight, scorekeep and destroy lives, regarless of their intentions. This is just as central to the condition as the portion that lends itself to sympathy for the disordered person. Titles like, "Stop Walking on Eggshells", "Stop Caretaking the Borderline or Narcissist", the rates of depression, suicide, etc. among those in the caretaker position doesn't describe a group of fulfilled people. It doesn't describe a group of people who feel "as good as possible." Instead, it describes the opposite. Caretakers are usually marked by two common characteristics, high conscientiousness and low self-esteem. Both traits are harmoniously aligned with the requirements of the particular kind of codependent relationship that Cluster B defines.
With the way you paint borderliners as the evil ones..
Evil is a useless distinction when talking about most people. The same holds true here and that is my position. Stated clearly, BPD/NPD/HPD/ASPD people aren't evil at all. I don't have to rest on opinion to arrive here. Clinically, provably, they are people who are absolutely in a hell that is not of their making. Adding to the cruelty of this is the fact that, for many, the catalyst was abuse or neglect visited upon them by people who were trusted with a sacred responsibility. I've heard clergy state that, "evil" requires knowledge and intent. Psychology sobers this axiom with one word that we can choose to employ in our quest to always keep empathy close at hand. That word is pathology. In this context, it can imply something beyond the clinical. It can and should be used to remove the bile from our sentiment about this unfortunate valley of the human condition. Disordered people are victims of chance and frequently of other people. It can often be difficult to hold this thought in mind while also giving the reality of disordered behavior, in this case, the behavior that other innocent loved ones will receive, its due. It is, however, a difficult thing we should value and work towards.